Sentences with phrase «even global concerns»

Transformation, for Cobb, includes renewal, but fosters broader societal engagements and even global concerns.

Not exact matches

Even though analysts have forecast continued momentum in global economic growth, concerns remain over how policy normalization might bring about changes after almost a decade of easy money.
Even investor concerns have started to migrate from the strength of global growth to more focus on regional geopolitical risks.
The pound fell 1 % after the announcement while yields on United Kingdom government bonds declined, aided in part by concerns expressed by the MPC that the uncertainty surrounding Brexit will continue to weigh on domestic activity, which has slowed even as global growth has accelerated.
The U.S. software firm debuted even as Brexit, interest rates and other global concerns have stalled most new listings.
In the same way, as I argued in the introduction to Stepping Stones to a Global Ethic, the contemporary concern for human rights, even if expressed in the thought forms of the Enlightenment, is grounded in faith traditions.28
The views of a visiting pope, respected by Catholics and many non-Catholics alike as a moral and spiritual leader of great prominence, will not make persons now unconcerned about global warming suddenly begin to grow concerned, nor even make skeptics of religious freedom begin to take its claims more seriously.
Even if you don't have a compassionate bone in your body for animals, surely the effects of global - warming must be a concern to EVERYONE
Even if you're not worried about «Global Warming» you should be concerned about the environment and wanting to preserve it.
I do have concerns with aluminum food / water containers, even though the link to Alzheimers hasn't been proven (look how long it has taken to «prove» global warming is human caused).
«Even the remote possibility of such an occurrence justifies concern,» added Robinson, one of the first scientists to link the burning of fossil fuels with global warming.
But here's your question: why we should be concerned even with the global temperature rise that has been predicted, let's say by 2050, of probably around 2 degrees C; one should understand that in the Ice Age — the depths of the Ice Age — the Earth was colder on a global average by about 5 degrees C.
Such scaremongering is especially painful to me because even though I do not think that government - approved GMO foods pose meaningful health risks to consumers, and even though I believe strategic genetic engineering can be an important tool to ease human suffering on our warming and resource - constrained planet, I share the concerns of many environmentalists about the homogenization and consolidation of the global food system — trends that are accelerated by the spread of industrially produced GMOs.
Rosenthal says that if carbon dioxide emissions become taxed in the future due to continuing concerns about global warming, his solar - driven catalyst for making synthetic fuel will compete even better economically with fossil fuels.
Reminds me of global warming deniers, ultra sensitive on their own websites about a peep showing evidence, but full of deliberately misleading and even rude posts on websites concerned with addressing AGW, whose regulars bend over backwards to respond both factually and super duper sensitively.
Our global online site can help seniors over sixty to find new friends and share interest, thoughts concerns, hobbies and even make new senior pen pals via our chat or private messaging system.
Star Wars Singles Dating Seniors Online Dating Toronto Toronto Singles Events, Groups, Dances, Activities... — Looking for... Toronto Singles Events, Toronto Singles Dances, Toronto Speed Dating, Toronto Singles Groups, Toronto Singles Activities, Toronto Singles... Our global online site can help seniors over sixty to find new friends and share interest, thoughts concerns, hobbies and even make new
In large part, what made Joe and Andrew Russo's Captain America: The Winter Soldier such a successful and somewhat transcendent superhero movie was that its going concern wasn't a global or even galactic catastrophe, but a personal one.
The issue of human - induced global warming was of concern even back then — although the public didn't pay much attention.
Even during the global financial crisis CocaCola still managed to grow revenues, only in 2009 did it see a small pull - back, but nothing to be concerned about.
And despite widespread skepticism, concern and even mistrust, I am certain the art market is deep and not under threat due to fundamental shifts in global patterns of consumption.
Nevertheless, reinsurance companies, like Munich Re, are very concerned about the impacts of global warming, and I don't think you can even buy hurricane insurance in some parts of Florida anymore.
Public opinion polls indicate that concern about global warming has been going down, even as the evidence (giant forest fires, drought, floods, record setting hot days etc) becomes so ironclad that it's almost a joke.
As far as this historic period is concerned, the reconstruction of past temperatures based on deep boreholes in deep permafrost is one of the best past temperature proxies we have (for the global regions with permafrost — polar regions and mountainous regions)-- as a signal of average temperatures it's even more accurate than historic direct measurements of the air temperature, since the earth's upper crust acts as a near perfect conservator of past temperatures — given that no water circulation takes place, which is precisely the case in permafrost where by definition the water is frozen.
Likewise, cyclones play a role in the global heat, moisture and momentum budgets, and my concern is that the GCMs still have some problems capturing all these aspects in a realistic manner through simple parameterization schemes (they tend to have regional biases) even though they provide a realistic over-all description.
The fact that so many people in the world believe, without understanding even the basic concepts, that global warming is indeed an issue should be a point of concern, not cause for celebration.
As world: Europe even China, India, concern about global warming, still so many Senaters do not wake up, no concern about global warming.
The bottom line is, if you're in a village — even in a highlands region facing more mosquitoes — is your main concern a global blunting of emissions of greenhouse gases or access to insecticides and mosquito nets?
However, if global warming is your concern, it's important to note that severe weather was not the only or even the main culprit for 2011 — about two - thirds of the total damages and about half of the insured losses can be attributed to two non-weather-related disasters: New Zealand's February earthquake and Japan's earthquake and tsunami in April.
The problem with that statement in this textbook is that these authors misuse it to argue that environmental policies based on concerns over global warming are not even worthy of support.
You say that this uncertainty is used «to argue that environmental policies based on concerns over global warming are not even worthy of support», but it seems to us that it is less the case that your objection is based on an argument made as much as the fact that they outlined a difference of opinion.
Equally importantly, even though the COAG reforms coincided with the emergence of global concerns about climate change, the reform process took no account of the possibility of carbon pricing, and made no provision for renewable energy.
Even though this series of blog posts concerns a prominent complaint filed in 2007 against the UK Channel Four Television Corporation video «The Great Global Warming Swindle,» my objective is to show how a thorough analysis of any given accusation about skeptic climate scientists being «paid industry money to lie» shatters the accusation to bits no matter where the hammer strikes.
While forecasting the state of the environment more than 80 years into the future is a notoriously inexact exercise, academics gathered by the the United Nations at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are concerned the world is headed for «extensive» species extinctions, serious crop damage and irreversible increases in sea levels even before Trump started to unpick the fight against global warming.
«This study — if you can even call it that — is exactly what the Union of Concerned Scientists said it needed to produce five years ago in order to create «wrongdoers» of global warming.
Even as shorter trends, CO2 content in atmosphere follow global temperature trends and not visa versa, for instance during glasials and interglasial, including even the current interglasial Holocene, as I already in my comment above stated concerning the recent increase of CO2 content in atmosphEven as shorter trends, CO2 content in atmosphere follow global temperature trends and not visa versa, for instance during glasials and interglasial, including even the current interglasial Holocene, as I already in my comment above stated concerning the recent increase of CO2 content in atmospheven the current interglasial Holocene, as I already in my comment above stated concerning the recent increase of CO2 content in atmosphere.
The people of Earth need fresh water and we all need to be more concerned about having more of it, even it takes more energy to make it or having to listen to the fearmongering of Leftist opinion - makers like Obama and Kerry who claim respectively that, «no challenge — poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change,» and, that global warming is, «perhaps the world's most fearsome weapon of mass destruction.»
Even among wealthy countries, most of which rank high or very high on the human development index (HDI), fighting global warming barely notches above the 10th most concerning issue.
If sound evidence somehow emerged that the concern over Anthropogenic Global Warming was either baseless or over-stated (I know, I know, it exists but is being repressed by the conspiracy), I'm sure that even political lightning - rod Al Gore would be delighted.
If the discussion of risk focuses on the local risks rather than the larger global risks, I am concerned that we may become paralyzed and make the difficult transition away from fossil fuels even more difficult than it already is.
I don't tend to write much about this, but my concern over global warming is based, to a great extent, on the losses in biodiversity that will inevitably result from climate change, even at rates that don't greatly damage human economic activity in general.
Even Republicans voters, whose party has long denied human - caused climate change, have shown increased concern for global warming when polled after Harvey and Irma.
The bigger question, if your are truly concerned about global warming, and conservation, are you willing to spend more, and adjust to a minimalist life style, even if it costs you a little more up front?
Even amongst those IPCC scientists who believe that man - made global warming is a serious concern, there are many who believe that the relative role of man - made global warming have been overestimated, and that the role of natural climate variability has been underestimated
Chief among those is what policy makers will actually do with a document that voices concern over climate change with even stronger language than before, and with greater resolution on predictions about global sea - level rise.
A Gallup poll in March showed that global warming is far down the list of concerns among Americans — even when asked to rank their environmental worries.
However the complexity of sea surface makes for instance any application of Henry's law be too uncertain, even impossible, to reach any quantitative results concerning the influence of global sea surface temperature on the CO2 content in atmosphere.
Just to let you know how stupid the global warming activists are, I've been to the south pole 3 times and even there, where the water vapor is under 0.2 mm precipitable, it's still the H2O that is the main concern in our field and nobody even talks about CO2 because CO2 doesn't absorb or radiate in the portion of the spectrum corresponding with earth's surface temps of 220 to 320 K. Not at all.
Above all though we learn that global cooperation — North - South, South - South, and even South - North — will be critical, lowering the barriers and costs for all concerned.
As for skeptics who concern themselves with the «pause in global warming», it is baffling to me how anybody would think a bit of cooling, warming or «pausing» over two or even ten decades can indicate very much at all.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z