«As one of the largest energy markets in Europe and the third - largest economy in the IEA, few countries have quite the same impact on European or
even global energy policy,» said Claude Mandil, Executive Director of the International Energy Agency (IEA), today in Berlin at the launch of Energy Policies of IEA Countries — Germany 2007 Review.
Not exact matches
The International
Energy Agency, which says that global oil demand could peak around 2020 if governments adopted particularly green policies, predicts that even if it happened, oil still would account for 23 % of total global energy in 2040, down from 32 % in
Energy Agency, which says that
global oil demand could peak around 2020 if governments adopted particularly green
policies, predicts that
even if it happened, oil still would account for 23 % of total
global energy in 2040, down from 32 % in
energy in 2040, down from 32 % in 2016.
Even if U.S.
energy policy goes «drill baby drill,» there will be no escape from the vicissitudes of the
global oil market
Even though
global emissions are forecast to decline overall to 2040, existing and planned
energy policies will not be enough to improve air quality, the report said.
We would argue that
global climatic disruption will make these relationships
even more crucial as the ever - escalating climate change impacts permeate issues of economic security, national and international security, national
energy policy, environmental and natural resource management and protection, and so on.
A 2011 Pike Research report projects that
even without new pro-geothermal
policies,
global investment in this
energy source will more than double from $ 3 billion in 2010 to $ 6.8 billion in 2020.
Germany and France will heavily shape future European and
even global energy and environmental
policies — Switzerland, Sweden, Belgium and other nations may also phase out their nuclear plants — but to date there has been little investigative reporting on the planned shift from nuclear
energy to fossil fuels and renewables.
China's top
global warming negotiator, Xie Zhenhua, is not
even on the 21 - member commission that China created in January to set
energy policy.
... they caution that society should fully quantify direct and indirect GHG emissions associated with
energy alternatives and associated consequences prior to making
policy commitments that have long - term effects on
global forests; for they ominously warn «there is a substantial risk of sacrificing forest integrity and sustainability for maintaining or
even increasing
energy production with no guarantee to mitigate climate change.»»
Last year, carbon emissions were unchanged
even as the
global economy grew by 3 per cent compared with 2013, according to a report by Renewable
Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21), a think tank linked to the UN Environment Programme.
This
even more difficult and costly goal requires urgent implementation of unprecedented new
energy policies, the widespread deployment of technologies still under development, and additional investments in the
energy sector that could reach 1.1 % of
global GDP each year between now and 2050.
It also highlights how domestic
policy initiatives and seismic
energy market shifts can quickly conspire to derail a once flourishing business model,
even without a
global climate deal, or federal carbon price.
The climate wars between the major political parties have cost us a host of lost business and employment opportunities,
even a
global leadership role, and yet we drift on without an
energy policy that might provide some relief to rising power costs and some strategy to meet our commitments to reduce emissions.
Even in light of the recent
policy work in the US
energy sector, the ambitious goals and approaches to carbon emissions reductions coming out of
global climate summits, and an increasing awareness of the various environmental issues we're facing, any changes we're making in our habits, systems, and
policies feel like they're too little, too late.