Sentences with phrase «even global understanding»

Not exact matches

In my mind, with the global market economy being both pervasive and here to stay, it's even more important to understand not just world events, but trends in those events.

But such a message needs to be accompanied by clear signals that the US will strive to be a reliable and predictable partner, that it understands its interest in strong effective global institutions, and that it recognises that even self - interested nations can benefit from thoughtful diplomacy.

Yet even in China there are pressures to enter the global system, and these can be best resisted if that system is understood.

Because our knowledge of the many delicate balances in the ecology of the planet is still in its infancy, and because what is known is not widely understood, the consequences of what the human race is (in its ignorance) doing to the earth may turn out to be even more serious than global warming.

In the past years global operators have understood that adaptations to local taste make their exploits even more successful.

@NII YOU SOUND LIKE YOU ARE GUILTY AND TALKED ABOUT OTHER FALSEHOOD RELIGION YOU DID NOT LIKE OR UNDERSTAND WHEN YOU WAS LITTLE CHILD OR YOUNGER ADULT OR MID LIFE PERSON.THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF GLOBAL FALSEHOOD RELIGIONS.BUT THIS ONE THING DOES NOT LIE (DNA) Y CHROMOSOME EVEN TOP SUPER SMART BLOND HEAD BLUE EYE PALE SKIN SUPER DNA RESEARCH PROFESSIONALS WITH MULTIPLE PHD DEGREES FROM NORWAY SWEDEN AND FINLAND DENMARK ETC KNOW THAT THE Y CHROMOSOME ALSO KNOWN AS THE ADAM Y CHROMOSOME CAMED OUT OF EAST AFRICA.falsehood religion did not make.the human race WISDOM DID WISDOM WALKED AND TALKED WITH MAN IT WAS WISDOM THAT MADE ADAM AND EVE.THINK ABOUT IT @NII NOW THE MOST DOMINANT DNA BELONGS TOO BLACK PEOPLE NOT EUROPEANS.LOOK AT ALL YOUR MIXED RACE BLACK PEOPLE»S TIGER WOOD»S HALLEY BERRY LENNY KRAVITZ LISA BONET ETC DNA DO NT LIE man made falsehood religion do lie

Sociologist and theologian Elaine Storkey, author of Scars Across Humanity: Understanding and Overcoming Violence Against Women, explains that a global pandemic affects women regardless of culture, region or country, or even to particular groups of women in a society.

I confess that I have become somewhat blasé about the range of exciting — I think revolutionary is probably more accurate — technologies that we are rolling out today: our work in genomics and its translation into varieties that are reaching poor farmers today; our innovative integration of long — term and multilocation trials with crop models and modern IT and communications technology to reach farmers in ways we never even imagined five years ago; our vision to create a C4 rice and see to it that Golden Rice reaches poor and hungry children; maintaining productivity gains in the face of dynamic pests and pathogens; understanding the nature of the rice grain and what makes for good quality; our many efforts to change the way rice is grown to meet the challenges of changing rural economies, changing societies, and a changing climate; and, our extraordinary array of partnerships that has placed us at the forefront of the CGIAR change process through the Global Rice Science Partnership.

He expands: «There is no doubt that, even now, around the world, the contribution he made to solving the global financial crisis and avoiding a depression is already, outside of Britain, very well understood.

There is no doubt that, even now, around the world, the contribution he made to solving the global financial crisis and avoiding a depression, that's already, outside of Britain, very well understood.

But here's your question: why we should be concerned even with the global temperature rise that has been predicted, let's say by 2050, of probably around 2 degrees C; one should understand that in the Ice Age — the depths of the Ice Age — the Earth was colder on a global average by about 5 degrees C.

The impact of these results is wide - reaching, and Dr Pullen suggests that it may even change how we think about global climate data: «Climate models need to incorporate genetic elements because at present most do not, and their predictions would be much improved with a better understanding of plant carbon demand.»

We hope in future to include even more detailed sequencing, to spot these rare mutations and better understand their global spread.

When considering gastric cancer, another H pylori - induced global killer, the necessity for understanding the pathogenesis of the infection and the role of host genetics in susceptibility is even greater.

Understanding global sea - level change assessments can be challenging, even for climate scientists.

There is therefore social acceptance on a global level and even your family members understand that there is love as well as curiosity of dating someone from a different race.

But even that intrastate relationship has deepened global understanding.

If we bring these observations to our global classroom, we build even greater understanding among kids and their various, rich cultures.

Moreover, Dr. Leonardo argues, the construct of whiteness continues to shape global cultural identities even as it fragments our total understanding of race.

hybid < > fuel economic in global; I simply dun understand why Prius, Honda Civic Hybrid use fuel inefficient petrol engines — BMW has similar fuel economies these hybrid have without hybrid technology in their comparable size 116i, 118d models and even for comparable price!!!

The impressions and understanding of art licensing — even among those who are successfully established in their careers — are frequently out of focus when compared to the realities of today's global economy and retail marketplace.

Even if ultimately there is real confidence in ocean heat content data — i.e. the trends exceed the differences in data handling — without understanding changes in reflected SW and emitted IR it remains impossible to understand the global energy dynamic.

In order to understand the potential importance of the effect, let's look at what it could do to our understanding of climate: 1) It will have zero effect on the global climate models, because a) the constraints on these models are derived from other sources b) the effect is known and there are methods for dealing the errors they introduce c) the effect they introduce is local, not global, so they can not be responsible for the signal / trend we see, but would at most introduce noise into that signal 2) It will not alter the conclusion that the climate is changing or even the degree to which it is changing because of c) above and because that conclusion is supported by multiple additional lines of evidence, all of which are consistent with the trends shown in the land stations.

I must admit that I don't understand how Svensmark can explain how GCR can explain the recent global warming if there evidently is no trend in the GCR (Even in his own papers, the GCR records have been plotted, and they do not exhibit trend!).

And an unnamed senior EU negotiator commented: «Perhaps I shouldn't say this, but some heads of state had trouble understanding the implications of the 2 °C target; sometimes they even accidentally talked of limiting global warming to 2 %.

I am not sure I understand Andy's question number (5), but «nature» involves many species: even if some parts of «nature» may survive global warming at the end (as parts of it have survived natural climate change events in the past), many parts of it are already going extinct and we are to blame this time around.

However, in the global mean, these changes sum to zero (or very close to it), and so the global mean sensitivity to global mean forcings is huge (or even undefined) and not very useful to understanding the eventual ice sheet growth or carbon cycle feedbacks.

But how on earth is finding more oil in the ground going to help the fight against global warming?Honestly, do you even understand what this is all about?

The fact that so many people in the world believe, without understanding even the basic concepts, that global warming is indeed an issue should be a point of concern, not cause for celebration.

But even with that in mind, it's really hard to understand how President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil, who has repeatedly pressed for strong global action to curb climate change, could possibly justify her choice of Aldo Rebelo as her new minister of science, technology and innovation.

I understand that the global warming on its own affects the churning up of nutrients, and the mixing of water — even without any changes to the THC at all (although a shut - down of the THC or even a slow - down would be absolutely disastrous for marine life).

Re Todd at # 1 and CM at # 5: Am I right in understanding that the key point is that it's quite possible for global surface temperatures to decrease even as the globe warms if more than the excess inflow of heat goes into the deep oceans?

Somehow we have got to open our eyes and widely share an adequate understanding of the ominous global challenges that loom before humanity, even now visible on the far horizon.

While talking with people all across this country, we found that * incredibly * few people had even the most basic understanding of global warming.

In truth, we do not understand climate enough to make even an uneducated guess about how much global warming our adding CO2 to the air will cause.

The occurence of El Niño itself is — as far as science understands the phenomenon, based largely on Pliocene paleoclimate comparisons, even Eocene «clam studies «-- probably not strongly influenced by the trend of global climate warming.

It's clear that Smith doesn't understand, willfully or otherwise, even the most basic ideas about global warming; he still claims global temperatures haven't risen since 1998, for example, sticking to a «pause» in warming that we know, and have known for some time, doesn't exist.

The truth on the natural cause of the recent global warming has to be proven to politicians as decision makers simply enough, that even they themselves can it understand.

If we really understand it all then even if the average global climate does not rise as fast as projected and despite the fact it is godawful cold outside, C) 2 - producting humanity can still be seen to be the destroyer of the Earth because it should be even colder.

Every effort is made to present all the issues, similar to what an enquiring mind would need to understand before rendering an opinion as to whether there are pros and cons to a warming (or cooling) scenario for a particular sector in a particular region, or even for the global society.

I can understand the notion that a «global» temperature derived differently might yield an informative perspective, particularly regarding seasonal effects, but it's not clear that it would improve our ability to discern trends, even including global trends.

The problem with under - coverage of polar and remote regions for representation on global surface temperature estimates even so late as today is a shameful comment on how little commitment to understanding our world better those with resources have.

Huffingtonpost: Time has proven that even 22 years ago climate scientists understood the dynamics behind global warming well enough to accurately predict warming, says an analysis that compares predictions in 1990 with 20 years of temperature records.

We are helping you to understand that there are other plausible explanations for global warming, and the assumption that it is due to CO2 is based only on opinionated papers hand - waved through the peer review process by friendly referees [while skeptical papers rarely see the light of day], and by computer model outputs, which are invariably unable to predict the future climate, or even today's climate with all available past data as the input.

Even though we have known and understood for decades the basic science of the terrestrial greenhouse effect, and water vapor feedback effects, in the current climate (politically speaking) of the frequently expressed irrational thinking, there is unfortunately a clear and pressing need to keep on repeating and explaining the most basic of global climate concepts.

Here, in the wake of the first presidential debate, the media skewered Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump for denying his prior Twitter claim that «the concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese» — even as Trump's surrogates continued to bluntly advance positions contrary to modern scientific understanding on the subject.

«In engaging, easy - to - understand language, Climate Change Denial tells us all we need to know about global warming denial, explaining why, even though the scientific evidence is irrefutable, denial continues to prosper.

If you really want to understand what the CACC propaganda is really all about (and it certainly isn't science) read the first article at «News: Global Warming Controversy» (http://www.global-warming.biz/news/Global-warming-controversy.html)-- «EXCITING NEW CARBON CREDIT SECRETS REVEALED How the Top People in Carbon Credits Are Quietly Making $ 100,000 to $ 50 Million Each Year (And How You Can Do The Same — Or Maybe Even Better)» (http://www.carbonventures.net/?hop=stevelast).

The complexity of the climate system and the uncertainty around our understanding of its mechanisms and the feedback interactions of it's components, along with the uncertainty around our measurements of its activity mean that at this stage we can not be sure global surface temperature will trend up or down, or even whether surface temperature is the most useful metric for the throughput of energy in the climate system.

Americans increasingly understand that even sending US carbon dioxide emissions back to 1870 levels, as congressional climate bills would do, will not reduce global atmospheric CO2 levels, because emissions from China, India and other nations will rapidly offset our painful reductions.