Sentences with phrase «even have labels»

All the best foods in the world don't even have labels on them.

Step back three or four decades and flexible workspace was unrecognizable; a scattered collection of office suites that didn't even have a label, much less an industry to belong to.

Not exact matches

While even a few years ago it would have been deemed unethical to «buy» media coverage (unless of course it was clearly labeled «advertorial»), today, there are entire companies dedicated to enabling brand leaders to buy coverage from so - called social influencers.

HMV has historically made up a huge chunk of music sales in Canada so everyone from record labels to musicians will now have to consider whether pressing music onto physical formats is even worthwhile, says Cross.

Luckily, failure — even if you do not label it as such — can be a beloved aspect of the road to success, something our world's brightest individuals have grown to respect and appreciate.

Also, even though Breyers had some of the healthiest products, their cartons are labeled as «frozen dairy desserts» instead of ice cream.

As I've argued before, when you are as massive a media entity as Facebook (despite its desire to avoid that label), it is incumbent on you to address your responsibilities directly, and possibly even ask for help, rather than just waving at the algorithm behind the curtain.

Even before Swift's letter was posted on Tumblr Sunday morning, independent record labels had complained that Apple's service took advantage of musicians.

Though critics over the years have labeled him any number of things — anarchist, socialist, even Marxist — make no mistake, Mackey is a true believer in (mostly unfettered) free enterprise, and his love for it is like that of a convert who finds salvation later in life.

With the Google service, people can more quickly find products like shirts that feature specific Disney characters through Disney's online store, even if the images haven't been properly labeled with the characters» names.

Flush with an investment from Bain Capital, growth has became even more of an imperative for this already white - hot label.

We paid Taylor's label and publisher roughly half a million dollars in the month before she took her catalog down — without even having 1989 on our service — and that was only going to go up.»

The company even works with small brands and has launched private labels in partnership with them.

Target had fallen into a trap of licensing outside brands like Cherokee, which makes children's apparel; even its in - house kids» label, Circo, felt dated.

Private - label partnerships can be useful even for extenders that have no global ambitions.

Hemp seed oil has even been used to treat skin conditions where oil deficiency is an issue, besides the fact it is labeled as a superfood.

Before the Dominion Elections Act (1920), voting in Canadian federal elections was largely governed by the provinces, just as voting in US federal elections is still, even today, governed by the «several States» (as they are wont to put it)-- except for the 1917 wartime election, labelled as the «largest gerrymander in Canadian history» (I've just finished a fascinating book about that election, fought over the issue of conscription; I highly recommend it).

Even if your mailing list is opt - in and has been painstakingly built up over time, there is still a danger of your message being labeled spam by anyone who forgot they agreed to receive updates.

Lately, it has been stepping up the marketing of its own label, even airing an ad during the 2013 Super Bowl.

Our base case: Technology broadly, including players outside the sector label, appear to have legs — even after a strong run.

or perhaps your belief in yourself should be even stronger than having to walk around and labeling yourself.

He was over there with the Pat Robertson's and John Hagee's... even though he would have hated to have been associated with them (kinda like how Steve calls himself a centrist to avoid that fundamentalist label... center of who?

Even so - called «radical / evangelical / whatever - the - label Christianity» has a teaching directly from Jesus to love your neighbor (even you enemieEven so - called «radical / evangelical / whatever - the - label Christianity» has a teaching directly from Jesus to love your neighbor (even you enemieeven you enemies!).

I'm speaking about my own faith only: To become a Christian, it must be your own choice.No else can decide this life style for you.I know many in the past and present have thought raising a child under the Christian label will save them for hell but in actual reality, the choice is their own not their parents etc.This life (being Christian) goes deeper than just believing.You have to consider this yourself.Many today do not even consider Christ as their savior because they just believe what their church or family says.

First I want to say that I'm not saying Atheist is a religion in a bad sence or to try and produce some sort of shame only that it falls under the definition of a religion and wondering how it would change your feelings \ view of Atheism even if everybody considered it a religous view, if it's something you believe to be true (that there is no god) what does it matter if someone labels it as your world view?

I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...

But now I say unto you, report those who disagree with you to the church or denominational authorities, label them heretics or say that they raise «red flags» and let everyone know not to listen to them, criticize their positions without ever going to them personally to find out what they actually believe and are teaching, align them with other «heretics» without ever researching their books, writings, and messages, and above all, side with your friends against them even if you personally have never been hurt or offended by them.

Whatever the outcome hopefully it would be based on evidence, so that even if it comes to it, a majority would be labeled as such if the evidential shoe fits.

I have even declined the opportunity to be more involved in some progressive Christian events, because labels like Emergent and Progressive do not reflect my theological positions and do not always FIT with how I see or practice faith.

You also point out that people who really reach out in love and compassion to people stuck in sins (sins that we may have even participated in before) are usually labeled «hateful».

I've even been labeled «dangerous» by suffocatingly ignorant «Christian» members of my family, for gaining a degree in Psychology as a middle aged woman.

Post offices, record labels, publishing companies, book stores, TV networks, travel agencies, education systems, economic systems, even governments are all under stress because they have transformed the conditions under which they were created.

You say «I've come to a place where many assume I'm an atheist, even though I wouldn't use that label to describe myself.»

I want to describe the process of how I've come to a place where many assume I'm an atheist, even though I wouldn't use that label to describe myself.

I wonder if we have even reached the stage of labelling Christians who have moved out and moved on.

Many anthropologists will label native religions as pagan, even if that religious tradition in Africa has nothing in common with one in the Philippines.

What I don't get is, being critical of Zionistic policies, agenda or people is quickly labeled as «anti-semitic» and is even considered illegal in countries like Germany, yet a bigoted person like Geert Wilders (who has not once consulted any expect or scholar on Islam) can make a video which literally embodies everything that hate, racism, and ignorance is about, and yet get away with it where the court recognizes it as «denigrating» but not «illegal»!?

To the folks who are vehemently denying this person was a Christian, I would urge you to consider this: If a person with a muslim name commits an act of terrorism, he is immediately labelled an «Islamic» terrorist, no questions asked, even though the Quran clearly states that a person who kills an innocent is like he / she has murdered then whole of humanity (the Quran mentions this in reference to murder of ANY innocent person, irrespective of the victims belief): To quote from the Quran: «On that account We ordained for the Children of Isra`il that if any one slew a person — unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land — it would be as if he slew the whole humanity: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole humanity.

I agree that those without brains would prefer to use anything to justify self - service, and then even make themselves feel better by sticking «rational» to the idea's label.

but also, the Dems would probably (* accurately *) label him a radical theological conservative (maybe even «fundamentalist» or «evangelical»?).

But if you've heard about this post at all before now, it's probably from Fox & Friends, currently having a conniption fit over the inclusion of the Holy Bible, which gets labeled «repetitive, self - contradictory, sententious, foolish, and even at times ill - intentioned.»

The label would also have repercussions for refugees who are applying to enter the US: less than 1 percent of Syrian refugees admitted to the US so far are Christians, even though Christians previously made up 10 percent of Syria's population, she said.

equality: «we» may indeed say that gays are equal... but do «they» [the «nay - sayers, if you like, as I don't want to use labels that don't work as in «fundamentalists», «conservatives», or even «liberals» — these terms have been hijacked and reinterpreted to mean something far from their original intent... sorry — pedantic me?!]

If you don't know how labels are reductions then I'm not sure how you would even begin to know if I know what I mean.

Even if the labels came from within, the preoccupation with whether or not gay Christians should have gay sex is, I think, I product of the enormous external pressure on gay Christians.

But most American practitioners wouldn't go nearly so far as to label yoga as a religious act or even to relate it to a specific religious tradition.

Historically figures labelled gods haven't always even truly been importal, with some susceptible to certain types of death.

Doesn't mean that I will like it, agree with it, or even respect it... but I respect that they have the opinion they have and they are entitled to that without it being boxed into a nice neat little label or category... yuck!

The very fact that they still have to label themselves as «dalits» even after conversion in order to seek special privileges exposes the futility of that exercise.

I'm not entirely comfortable with the progressive label and have an even lower identification with party labels.