Rouleau JA held in Gauthier that where elements of a breach of contract or a claim in negligence are pleaded properly the Superior Court of Justice does have jurisdiction to
even hear claims that are academic in nature.
Not exact matches
During the House committee
hearing on Wednesday, Zuckerberg
claimed not to know what «shadow profiles» are,
even though this term has been used for years to describe Facebook's collection of data about people who don't use its services by harvesting the inboxes and smartphone contacts of active Facebook users.
the Word - Yes we are supposed to read for ourselves, and test our pastors / preachers with the Bible - but the Bible is meant to be
heard, and it's good to have someone exposit it - yes unfortunately there's a lot of bad theology, and
even cults
claiming to be Christian, we were warned about false teachers.
There is no evidence that what these men
claimed to
hear, see, or feel was actually god,
even if they did experience it.
I do
hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may
even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while
claiming to be deep and pious.
He
claimed to have never
heard from victims about Mr Barros,
even though he had received in 2015 a letter from Mr Cruz detailing Mr Barros» wrongdoing.
@ Alias: because you begin by assuming God's an idiot (a self - refuting concept), you don't
even hear the complexity of what the biblical God is
claiming.
8... «do not
even claim to have been witnesses» 1 John 1:1 «That which was from the beginning, which we have
heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched — this we proclaim concerning the Word of life.»
Christine, I
hear this
claims quite often, but I have yet to
hear anything
even remotely convincing that these experiences are anything more than wishful thinking.
I
hear a lot of liberal Christians and non-believers attacking the right - wing (and
even moderate evangelicals) for
claiming to know «the truth.»
This
claim seems to me to be far more philosophically penetrating, and more disturbing, than the often -
heard but more piecemeal criticisms of modern technology's negative environmental, economic, or social - political consequences, or
even the critique of present uses of technology as «inhumane» or contrary to basic human values.
The
claim of the Christian Church to make its voice
heard in matters of politics and economics is very widely resented,
even by those who are Christian in personal belief and in devotional practice.
But you do
hear us mention the Christian god more often than others for the simple fact that most of us grew up in the US where
even today just over 75 % of the population
claims to be Christian.
Its got to the point where youve got a bunch of guys
claiming to have injuries that I never
even heard existed.
For now though, San Francisco appears to be hanging onto the 24 year old,
even after
hearing claims from the Santa Clara County district attorney's office that Foster allegedly struck his live - in girlfriend's head 8 - 10 times, ruptured her eardrum, dragged her by her hair, and tried to keep her from reporting the incident.
How often have we
heard midwives continuing to
claim the pregnancy is low risk
even when its clearly not.
No maximum cutoff has been identified or
even suggested as harmful by reputable medical organizations that I've
heard of, and no research I've ever seen has indicated support for the outrageous
claims you've made.
The most often
heard claim of this variety — that this is * all * about plunder — was not
even credible during the height of Rwandan commercial militarism in around 2002 (when Paul Kagame, in a rare unguarded moment, described the Rwandan campaign as «self - financing»).
If the court thinks that it's highly likely that this is the case, then the
claim won't
even proceed to a full
hearing.
«The Ministry of Justice is consulting on proposals that would increase the number of disputed compensation cases
heard by small
claims courts — where claimants have to pay their own legal fees
even if they win.
I certainly find it very odd to
hear them
claim that the first - past - the - post voting system «gave us the Iraq war» and then prescribe a change which would have given Tony Blair an
even larger majority...
The Associated Press called the race for Cuomo before 10:30, and he
claimed victory in a statement at 10:45 p.m., thanking supporters for the progress they've made, talking about general election contrast and
even nodding to Teachout and Wu for «running a spirited campaign, engaging in the democratic process and having the courage to make their voices
heard.»
On the left, this
claim is barely
even listened to or, if
heard, is dismissed with contempt.
Yet, you can often
hear claims that protein supplements are inferior to whole - food protein sources, or
even that they're unhealthy and dangerous.
I
hear people
claiming that high doses of iodine (Lugol's) is important to support the thyroid; however, if I
even eat small amounts of kelp powder, it makes my thyroid swell (I can feel the discomfort in my throat) and causes major mood swings.
I recently had a mini debate with a vegan on youtube... I know I'm weird I shouldn't
even try... but I've
heard this
claim before and was wondering if this is a made up vegan rebuttal to the Inuits health?
They seem to
claim — in their books as well as in many interviews I've
heard — that once you go out of ketosis by eating higher carb / protein
even just once that it can take weeks to become «keto adapted» again.
And
even though you might
hear raw foodists
claim that you lose enzymes and nutrients by cooking it, that is simply not true.
Very few want to
hear that his or her time and energy was invested in a bogus
claim,
even claims detrimental to one's health.
The pink clay sounds different and interesting enough to make me want to try it,
hearing that it lives up to it's
claims and it is a great purchase makes it
even more tempting!
All I
hear besides this from you, everyone else I spoke
claim it to be the best Wii game ever, and
even one of the best games of all times.
Despite this cultural prevalence, Deadpool 2 screenwriters Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick
claim they'd never
even heard of fridging before writing the film, and offer an explanation for their treatment of Vanessa that hews remarkably close to the textbook definition of the trope.
And
even those states rejecting the Common Core are
claiming that they, too, believe in high standards, although calls for cutbacks in state testing can also be
heard.
If you're sick and tired of
hearing that the Ford Fiesta is the best - driving supermini currently available (and that's before you
even consider the excellent Fiesta ST), the Mazda 2 is one of few rivals likely to challenge that
claim.
It's perhaps the biggest single influence on his ultimate career choice -
even though Sansom
claims «I would never tell anyone that I was a writer, not because it's a secret, but just because it sounds so daft - «Oooh», I can
hear my family and my friends and the great heavenly host of actual, real dead writers chorusing, «He says he's a writer.»»
It gets
even worse when you
hear recent survey results that say three out of four people will file to
claim Social Security benefits as soon as they're eligible at age 62.
I've
even heard mortgage brokers
claim this was a no cost loan, though it's anything but considering you also pay interest on the extra amount you borrow.
Same with these breeders
claiming MINI BULLDOGS... They will tell you everything you want to
hear and when full grown that puppy, which they probably sold for a lot more, ends up being the size of a standard frenchie or for all you know
even bigger.
I have
heard people make such
claims even over a 12 - week old puppy!
I just
heard that Pedigree sued Blue Buffalo for false advertising for
claiming there are no meat «by - products» in their food and that it was proven they do use meat by - products (ground up beaks, claws and
even some feathers for example) and that Blue is blaming this on suppliers and still has not addressed it.
If you'd told me this a year ago, I'd have laughed you out of my Celebrity Deathproof Bunker 2016 Edition, and you'd
even hear some chuckles were the
claim thrown around back in March.
I've
heard a sort - of simliar
claim that goes «It only takes a hurricane 15 minutes to build up more energy than all the world's nuclear weapons,» which is so patently screwed - up I don't
even know where to begin.
Yet, while thunder can only be
heard from 16 km under good conditions some people will
claim that wind turbines can be
heard from similar, or
even greater, distances.
Also to
claim that the temperature change is well defined
even though the details are wrong is a statement that sounds like the assurances that we
heard from bankers that subprime mortgages should be rated AAA.
This is the first I've
heard of any of this,
even the post let alone the paper it
claims to defend against its critics.
I had not
even paid attention to
claims of global warming myself before late 2009 (I don't know if I
even heard of it before that), yet within a year I had disproved the «greenhouse effect» being foisted upon the people of the world as «settled science», and shown that climate scientists should have done the same 20 years ago, if any had been competent in their field.
Seitz
claimed that one of the earlier
evening hearings in May was inconvenient for farmers.
I'm not sure why you or we
even bother with the likes of Monkton, Pilmer etc, everything I've seen and
heard is they over inflate their own credentials on the topic, unresearched or fake
claims about the science, avoid and duck honest debate about their own positions.
Some, or
even many, of those who
claim that turbines cause sickness would have us believe that there is something coming from wind turbines, other than the sounds that everyone who visits a wind farm can
hear, and beyond the low levels of infrasound that acousticians can detect, that makes people sick; and yet they seem unable to tell us what that thing is.
I can't
even count how many different people over the years that I have
heard claim that they got cheated in their divorce settlement because their lawyer was in cahoots with the other side.