Sentences with phrase «even joint custody of his children»

Not exact matches

If you have questions about whether you should keep or sell the family home, how child support and spousal support work, how to increase your chances of getting joint or even sole custody of your children, and proven strategies to help yourself (and your children) to heal from divorce, you'll find the answers here.

Joint custody, he asserts, involves each parent's having joint control over the care, upbringing and education of the children, even though the children reside most of the year with one parent, while divided custody involves each * 272 parent's having the children for a part of the year with control over the children only when in his or her cusJoint custody, he asserts, involves each parent's having joint control over the care, upbringing and education of the children, even though the children reside most of the year with one parent, while divided custody involves each * 272 parent's having the children for a part of the year with control over the children only when in his or her cusjoint control over the care, upbringing and education of the children, even though the children reside most of the year with one parent, while divided custody involves each * 272 parent's having the children for a part of the year with control over the children only when in his or her custody.

Some moms in this predicament even wonder whether formally filing for child custody could work against them, causing an absent father to reappear «out of the woodwork» and demand joint custody or regular visitation.

Even when it is determined that the child needs to spend time with both parents in order to thrive, courts are increasingly reluctant to award joint physical custody because of the disruptions it causes children.

Alaska law also creates a «rebuttable presumption» (a legal assumption that has to be overcome with credible evidence to the contrary) that if an abusive parent has a history of committing domestic violence against the other parent, a child, or even a domestic living partner, the abusive parent must not be awarded sole legal custody, sole physical custody, joint legal custody, or joint physical custody.

Others thought that joint custody should be granted even if there was no agreement as it is in the best interest of the children to cooperate.

If you're divorcing in this state, and you have a history of perpetrating family violence, you can't have custody of your children — even joint custody shared with their other parent.

Ultimately, custody is based on what is in the best interests of the children, and joint custody may not result in a perfectly even split between both parents.

Ultimately, custody is based on what is in the best interests of the children, and joint custody may not result in a perfectly even split between -LSB-...]

You may be entitled to some child support even if you and your spouse share joint custody of your children.

Missouri courts usually prefer joint custody and equal property division, but making your spouse's adultery an important issue in the divorce proceeding can impact parts of your case, including financial aspects like property division, spousal maintenance, attorney fees and maybe even child custody and visitation.

Children who are in joint custody have not been shown to be protected by going back and forth between mothers» and fathers» households, and «shared parenting» does not duplicate the well - being found in intact homes (even though researching this database largely eliminates the problem of conflating data such as from unwed inner - city teenager households with divorced households, and even though this database would contain all the non-abusive, amicable divorce cases.)

After extensive testimony from both parents, the trial court not unreasonably concluded that it was in the «best interest» of the minor children that the father and the mother retain joint legal custody and that the mother retain sole physical custody, even if she moved to Lancaster.

Joint custody, when possible, is seen a practical and desirable since this is crucial in a continuing parent - child relationship even after divorce; however, it may be practical when the welfare of the child is jeopardized by one parent.

Joint custody theory however, even when very young children commenced in sole mother custody, arguably resulted in far more children ending up in the sole custody of their fathers than would reasonably be expected — or reasonably would approximate that parent's share of the childcare and homemaking in «intact» two - parent homes.

Martha Jacobson felt that the father should have joint custody, even though he had not asked for it, and even though she knew that he was planning to move 40 miles away to the next county right after the divorce, which would pose logistical problems with this kind of arrangement for a child in preschool or kindergarten.

Even if a child's parent or parents are alive, a grandparent or other relative may be able to obtain joint custody of the child if they can prove that the parent or parents are unfit in some states.

Joint custody can apply even when one parent has overnights with the children 1/3 of the time; however, the parent who has the children 2/3 of the time will be the Parent of Primary Residence (PPR) and the parent with fewer overnights will be the Parent of Alternate Residence (PAR).

Even if the parents had joint legal custody of their children, the parent with whom the children lived most of the time was named the «residential custodian.»

Thus joint custody does appear to protect children from the complete loss of a parent, even in high conflict situations.

However, even this turns into a larger net loss in buying power for the custodial parent because of inflation during the same time period...» [Presumption of joint custody] legislation increased the number of motions to modify or enforce parenting time or child custody... the number did increase significantly (and almost doubled) following enactment of the statute.

The study did find one significant benefit from shared parenting even in these cases: «Only one parent with joint custody ceased contact with her child, whereas 12 parents of sole custody children «dropped out».»

[FN181] Nevertheless, the alternative of no access to this type of public benefit in one of their dwellings under a joint physical custody arrangement makes the lives of children living in poverty even more tenuous.

Even many feminists embraced «equal parental responsibility» rhetoric along with the post-hippy-era California notion of «joint custody,» which ironically, set up the perfect ploy toward an ultimate agenda of doing away with child support altogether!!

Joint custody can also refer to joint physical custody, in which the child spends time with each parent, either on a roughly even basis or in blocks of time that are, in effect, no greater than visitation under a sole custody arrangeJoint custody can also refer to joint physical custody, in which the child spends time with each parent, either on a roughly even basis or in blocks of time that are, in effect, no greater than visitation under a sole custody arrangejoint physical custody, in which the child spends time with each parent, either on a roughly even basis or in blocks of time that are, in effect, no greater than visitation under a sole custody arrangement.

However, the research reviewed here does not support claims by critics of joint custody that joint - custody children are likely to be exposed to more conflict or to be at greater risk of adjustment problems due to having to adjust to two households or feeling «torn» between parents... It is important to recognize that the results clearly do not support joint custody as preferable to, or even equal to, sole custody in all situations.

Another example raises the question of what influences advocacy, this one from a woman lawyer and AFCC activist who inexplicably lobbies for joint custody and father's rights (and more therapeutic jurisprudence in the courts) even though the arrangement worked for neither herself as a child, nor, ultimately, her own daughter: [ANONYMOUS LISTSERVE COMMENT]: «In personal life, we learn things about the day to day realities too, that influence the lenses through which we see life.

[FN50] Joint custody arrangements were accepted even thoughjoint custody was considered suspect, particularly for children of tender years.

According to the terms of Section 19-6-15 of Georgia's Official Code, even when parents share joint physical custody and their children live with each of them a fairly equal amount of time, judges must name one parent as «primary custodian.»

The stay was denied because the appeal judge was not convinced that the joint custody order would cause irreparable harm to the child or even that the balance of convenience favoured the stay.

[FN156] The case was tried prior to the Act's passage, but the Court of Appeals referred to the new law specifying its application to unmarried parents as bolstering its conclusion that even prior to the passage of the Act, joint custody could be awarded to unmarried parents, «particularly in a case such as this, where both parents -LSB--RSB- actively participated in the upbringing of the child.»