Not exact matches
Stupid
humans fight and
kill over their imaginary friend for 1000's of years and goes back
even further to the polytheistic civilizations before that.
Yet could not VHA have suggested to the U.S. Supreme Court that, since the Court has held that there is a constitutional right to
kill unborn
human beings, there is surely also the constitutional right,
even of a secular hospital, to refuse to?
As
humans created in the image of God we are capable of divine expression
even in our pitiful fallen state;
even the soldiers in World War 1 had a brief respite on Christmas and walked out of the trenches to greet each other only to return to the trenches the next day and resume
killing each other.
So we Christians do not oppose nuclear weapons because they threaten to destroy «mother earth,» but because the God we serve would not have one life unjustly taken
even if such a
killing would insure the survival of the
human species.
, then Job can ask — and indeed if he is
human he must ask — «Where were you, O God, on that day when all my herds were taken and all my servants and
even all my children were
killed?
In a statement read in Sunday Masses in the capital, Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle said: «We knock on the consciences of those who
kill even the helpless, especially those who cover their faces with bonnets, to stop wasting
human lives.
Though on a smaller scale than in the early «80s, political
killings still go on, yet not one ranking military officer has ever been tried for
human rights violations — not
even in the Romero case, despite the unassailable evidence implicating (then Major) Roberto D'Aubuisson and his cohorts.
It is true that a variety of widely accepted norms, including the keeping of certain promises, the abhorrence of unjustified
killing of
human beings, and perhaps
even the sanctity of property rights, promote the adaption of the
human species to its environment.
No individuals who live in civil societies require weapons designed to hunt and
kill other
human beings...
even if the target is a Christian evangelical (but then again).
Versus
humans killing humans who can't
even figure our own lives out, yet we think we have what it takes to judge others.
This is true
even for
killing other
human beings.
In fact, some of his greatest arguments with the soldiers / governments over the years have been over this very issue — the
humans are afraid and so they want to
kill the aliens while he wants to encourage life and cooperation (thinking in particular of the Ninth Doctor with Harriet Jones or
even the battle of Canary Wharf when we lost Rose because of Torchwood opening the breach etc.).
Even if one gets to blame Satan for all that, Satan didn't even come close to killing almost every human on earth the way god excelled
Even if one gets to blame Satan for all that, Satan didn't
even come close to killing almost every human on earth the way god excelled
even come close to
killing almost every
human on earth the way god excelled at.
To
kill for food was a natural and normal part of life —
even if it meant
killing other
human beings.
If a blacksmith makes a knife to cut vegetables, but someone else uses it to
kill humans, it is not the knife's fault, the blacksmith's fault for making the knife, or
even God's fault for making the blacksmith.
But
even if religion were to fade away,
humans would just come up with another reason to
kill each other.
It really shouldn't be necessary to
even have laws regarding such matters, but then again, it shouldn't be necessary to have laws that say you can't up and
kill somebody you are angry with, but it is necessary and
human behaviour does need to be regulated if we are to be able to live together in any sense of civility.
Therefore — the baby is
human, and no one, not
even the mother, has a RIGHT to
kill that child in her womb.
Alaso, ArthurP seems to be engaging in a form of personal «transference» by ascribing his own feelings and then «transferring» them to other people who he doesn't know, and then making assumptions about the way things «should be» without asking them, or, in fact, assuming that they were somehow better off
killed and then goes on to say things that to a
human who is basically coherent, can appear fatalistic and perhaps
even suicidal.
Free will,
even if
humans have it, is not responsible for earthquakes, tsunamis, Hurricanes, pathogens etc., that
kill and cause suffering for thousands.
I'm pretty sure they'd do some of the things we do if they ruled the world it's natural you dumb monkey bitch... I'll tell you what since you think animals are better why don't you stop using technology of any sort tv, car, phone, computer, please oh please traffic lights run around in the wild don't
even eat
human prepared food just go out and eat leaves and shit off the trees go to the jungle I guarantee you these animals would
kill you at some point then at least at the end of the day you would know you did the world a favor....
However, an
even bigger concern to me is the amazing ability of pathogens to adapt, mutate, and become resistant to any «treatment»
humans think will
kill them.
Killing Human is Haram, i.e. unlawful, unless in special conditions (In fact even killing animals is abominable, with some exce
Killing Human is Haram, i.e. unlawful, unless in special conditions (In fact
even killing animals is abominable, with some exce
killing animals is abominable, with some exceptions.
«I hope you will agree with me that a weapon with the capacity to
kill a
human from over a mile away, pierce body and vehicle armor, and destroy military and civilian infrastructure should not be available in New York State without registration and without
even a permit.
Even if you come today and start a church you name «
Kill Every
Human Being Church», some people will still join you.
Darimont predicts other large carnivores would show similar responses because
humans have effectively become the planet's apex predators —
even if we often do not eat what we
kill.
Sure, they may occasionally do worse than a
human driver would, he concedes, and their imperfections will inevitably
even kill people.
It's the stuff of science fiction: robots that can hunt down and
kill humans, powerful lasers that can destroy targets without leaving a trace, and a weapon that can supposedly knock you down without
even touching you — all of these, and more, came one step closer to reality in 2008.
«
Even though
humans mount a defense against M. tuberculosis that can contain its growth, in general that defense is insufficient to
kill the bacteria,» Dr. Shiloh explained.
A HUNGRY elephant is normally too big, tough and smart to deter, so can devastate crops and
even end up being
killed by
humans.
Initially other people are dehumanized: all those who do not follow the recruit's same path of «awakening» are considered not really
human;
killing them is not a crime and is
even a duty.
In her most recent book, Mother Nature: Maternal Instincts and How They Shape the
Human Species, she demonstrated that mothers may abort, abandon, or
even kill offspring they do not have the resources to rear.
Today's common hippo is known to
kill humans and
even crocodiles.
No offense but your information is highly wrong (my opinion) because back then during patheolic era
humans lived off meats and animals and
even hunted and
killed many back then and they continued to live longer then we live now because of all this government bullshit about wheat, grains, and legumes etc..
While no universal definition of veganism exists, the term stems from the idea that
humans should live without
killing or exploiting animals; this means no meat, eggs, milk and, for many vegans,
even honey since the bees work for us.
All the while there are several tepid make - out scenes going on and the
humans venture out of their lair to steal food and provisions, while a demented alien security officer, or «Seeker» (Diane Kruger, «Inglourious Basterds «-RRB-, is searching Monument Valley for the resistance,
even killing her own to get at them.
Saulnier wanted to show that people were still
human even if they have been trained to
kill.
In a scene that looked to be straight out of a horror movie with a much larger budget, viewers were treated to an abundance of gore, creative zombie
killings and gruesome deaths (both zombie and
human) that pleased
even the most veteran genre fans.
Even the Martians, who look quite cartoonish, especially when compared to the real - life actors that surround them, are supposed to garner a few chuckles from the element of surprise in their
killings and experimentation with
humans, but it all comes across as rather brutal or grotesque.
This year alone, they released six of the most inventive, quality offerings out there: two terrifying survival thrillers, Damien Power's devastating and brilliant
Killing Ground and Sam Patton's lesser but still - worthy Desolation; Sean Byrne's masterful tale of artistic obsession and satanic possession The Devil's Candy (all three
even harder to endure because the featured families in peril are so
human and likable); A Dark Song, an unnerving occult thriller in which a woman hires a medium to help make contact with her dead daughter; and House on Willow Street, which, similar to last year's horror highlight Don't Breathe, sees a house robbery — led by a woman with a mission, played by modern scream - queen Sharni Vinson — go terrible wrong, but this time in a more supernatural way.
They celebrate love as though it's power,
even though it has
killed far more
humans than I ever have.
These are generic terms that encompass a selection of anonymous meats and in some cases might
even include road
kill, or other meats that are unfit for
human consumption.
Before the late 20th century proliferation of pit bulls into the dog population, no other breed had ever
killed or maimed
humans in numbers that come
even remotely close to those
killed by pit bull type dogs.
The
human race has wiped out hundreds of species of animals in its shorter history on this planet
kill what they don't understand if the dog is muzzled in public kept on a lead unless on its own kept in secure conditions and looked after with love and strength then what the fuck has it got to do with anyone else its criminal to remove a dog not allow it to be
even seen to make sure its being looked after or find anything out as to its well fare keep the dog caged for the 9 to 12 month they keep it u get an animal back not a well adjusted dog.
Though mushrooms and other fungi vary widely in toxicity (some mushrooms are strong enough to
kill humans in tiny quantities, while others probably would not
even cause any immediate harm to your bunny), it can be very difficult to tell which ones are poisonous and which ones are not.
This is complicated by the fact that
humans can handle certain toxins that rabbits can not — which means that
even mushrooms that are totally safe for people could
kill a rabbit.
Even very small doses of certain
human drugs can
kill a cat or do serious damage to a dog.
As
humans, we think nothing of popping a Tylenol or Advil if we feel achy or sore —
even a child's dose of these medications can
kill a cat instantly and cause liver and kidney damage to dogs that is severe and potentially fatal.
No -
kill militancy also holds that it is okay to adopt out potentially dangerous dogs,
even if they might
kill other animals or
humans.
Dogs that showed aggression toward
humans,
even in the middle of a fight, were usually
killed and never bred.