Sentences with phrase «even know the gene»

Not exact matches

Even before the company's novel gene - profiling tool was market - ready, even before they knew how to outflank a long - established competitor (Affymetrix), Stuelpnagel was looking far into the futEven before the company's novel gene - profiling tool was market - ready, even before they knew how to outflank a long - established competitor (Affymetrix), Stuelpnagel was looking far into the futeven before they knew how to outflank a long - established competitor (Affymetrix), Stuelpnagel was looking far into the future.

For example, we see the genes for air - based olfaction (smelling) in whales that no longer even have olfactory organs.

So in the cited reference, even though we start with 4 alleles, we know that for many, many genes, 3/4 would be lost, forever, after a few generations.

The DNA of many ancestors is in our blood and genes have * memes *, which may explain why we sometimes get that deja vu feeling even though we know we've never been here before.

If Chad and others argue that naturalistic evolution must be dismissed because we don't know exactly what happened with gene mutation and transmission frequencies during particular periods of rapid change, then how can we accept a replacement argument in which we don't even know what happens at all?

@ED The only thing that is assumed to be at least more or less constant in evolutionary theory is the mutation rate of individual genes, and even that, since mutations are known, eg, to increase under higher radiation, is only true «on average, over the long run».

And even though she isn't a sweet tooth (I guess it's not the dominant gene in my family), I know she can't resist a couple of desserts:

No, not even Gene Hackman.

«If we know which genes are damaged in a breast cancer patient's immune system, prevention or even therapy can be tailored by giving vaccines or perhaps antiviral drugs to reduce the chances of recurrence,» said Friedenson.

Using what we know about human genes, for example, could help us extrapolate details like Neanderthal hair and eye color, their genetic diseases, and possibly even their language capabilities.

Zimmer: We do hardly know anything about genes that have to do with intelligence and what -LSB-'s] surprising is that this ignorance is taking place even when we have really sophisticated tools.

We don't know enough,» Esvelt says, adding, «I'm probably the foremost scientific critic of gene drives even though I'm a leader in the field.»

«Little is known even about what genes distinguish one neuron from another, even though they might perform quite different functions,» Kandel says.

Though this is true for some traits, we now know that many traits are controlled by tens or even hundreds of genes spread throughout our genomes.

«We don't know if studying the fish will directly help us,» said Rohner, «but evolution has tried a lot of gene variants over millions of years and I think that's smarter than anything we can come up with, even with machine learning.

We're still struggling with the smallest bacterial cell, in which we don't know what even one - fifth of the genes do.

«Even when the genes driving cancer are known, clinicians don't have an efficient way to choose among the hundreds of possible drug therapies,» said study leader Kai Wang, PhD, associate professor of biomedical informatics and director of clinical informatics at the Institute for Genomic Medicine at CUMC.

It's long been known that bacteria can swap DNA through a process called conjugation, which allows helpful genes to spread quickly between individuals and even between species.

We do not know even the basic facts about it, such as how many genes it contains — although the guesses are converging on a figure of 38,000 — let alone what each gene is and how genes interact with one another.

But oddly, the secretion still took place even when they drastically mutated the gene — a resilience not found in any known secretion signal.

«We do not even know the traits we will need in the future and which of the present breeds possess the requisite genes,» he says.

Knowing the origin of each cell and which genes control their normal function are the foundations for scientists to decipher the disease process and eventually to find out how to guide the cells to self - repair or even to build up a brand new organ using amended cells from the patients.»

Her message: Not even the experts can distinguish a 1 from a 4 if they don't know the genes.

«We don't even know how gene expression changes on a day - to - day basis!»

For instance, in the human genome we still see the remnants of the large olfactory receptor gene family that gave our evolutionary ancestors a keen sense of smell, even though humans no longer rely on them.

Even some known cancer genes for lung adenocarcinoma, one of the most intensively studied cancers, haven't popped out in cancer genome surveys.

When mice were no longer babies — at five weeks — the scientists were not able to regenerate their limbs, even if the gene was stimulated.

Compounding this risk, the liver cells that now contain the DNA for ZFNs will keep making the nucleases for perhaps years, even though they are no longer needed to guide the new gene to its spot in the genome.

Segal: «We can not change our genes, but we now know that we can affect — and even reshape — the composition of the different kinds of bacteria we host in our bodies.

«Lots of people working around gene drives hadn't been in touch with each other and some didn't even know what the CBD was,» Coche says.

Sharma and She note the reality that not all patients with the high - risk genes even get the disease, although they still don't know why.

CRISPR / Cas systems are known as promising «gene scissors» in the genome editing of plants, animals, and microorganisms by targeting specific regions in their DNA - and perhaps they can even be used to correct genetic defects.

Yet even knowing exactly which mutated gene causes a disease — as in Huntington's and cystic fibrosis — doesn't necessarily mean it is either preventable or curable.

Almost one - third of the genes in the minimal genome are secret ingredients that do something important, even though scientists don't know what that something is.

«With 20,000 genes, how is it even possible to understand what you must know in researching disease?

What is known from global studies is that exposure to biologically active compounds, even at ng / L concentrations, can impact endocrine systems in nature and manifest as negative impacts like altered gene regulation, the presence of mixed reproductive tissues (intersex) and skewed sex ratios.

But she knew if she succeeded, CRISPR would be «a profound discovery» — and maybe even a powerful gene therapy technique.

This is because the precise combination of genes contributing to the trait can not be predicted either (or, perhaps, even known).

«Our study demonstrates that even well - studied bacteria — the ones that we know cause disease or their close relatives — have many genes associated with antibiotic resistance that have not been characterized before,» said senior author Gautam Dantas, PhD, associate professor of pathology and immunology.

«Even though we identified 81 percent of the genes that were already known to be cell - cycle regulated, we found only about a 65 percent overlap between cell - cycle genes identified by our method and the previous method.

That genetic litmus test has been applied since before people even knew the chemical DNA is what makes up genes.

But did you know that we are often healthy even when we have two faulty copies of the same gene?

And for a vegan bodybuilder who must unfortunatelly play tetris with the food sources that he choses in order to give to his body the right ammounts of aminos, restricting SPI and soy foods so much does not make his goal any easier.There are sometimes that you need a meal thats complete with aminos and soy provides that meal with the additional benefits of lacking the saturated fats trans cholesterol and other endothelium inflammatory factors.I'm not saying that someone should go all the way to 200gr of SPI everyday or consuming a kilo of soy everyday but some servings of soy now and then even every day or the use of SPI which helps in positive nitrogen balance does not put you in the cancer risk team, thats just OVERexaggeration.Exercise, exposure to sunlight, vegan diet or for those who can not something as close to vegan diet, fruits and vegetables which contains lots of antioxidants and phtochemicals, NO STRESS which is the global killer, healthy social relationships, keeping your cortisol and adrenaline levels down (except the necessary times), good sleep and melatonin function, clean air, no radiation, away from procceced foods and additives like msg etc and many more that i can not even remember is the key to longevity.As long as your immune system is functioning well and your natural killer cells TP53 gene and many other cancer inhibitors are good and well, no cancer will ever show his face to you.With that logic we shouldn't eat ANY ammount of protein and we should go straight to be breatharians living only with little water and sunlight exposure cause you like it or not the raise of IGF1 is inevitable i know that raise the IGF1 sky high MAYBE is not the best thing but we are not talking about external hormones and things like this.Stabby raccoon also has a point.And even if you still worry about the consumption of soy... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21711174.

Even though genetics (the last sub-group) is reported to accounted for 35 - 50 % of happiness, we now know that «our genes are not our destiny» and we can actually switch on good genes and switch off bad genes when we change our diet and environment.

Of course, we know that genes alone are not responsible for cancer because we share many of the same genes as our hunter — gatherer ancestors and even just the same genes as our ancestors several generations ago, and yet the rate of cancer keeps going up.

Early - life stressors are known to induce changes in gene expression that set the stage for disease in later life.30 Thus, unfortunately, exposure to mercury in either parent, even prior to conception, can affect the child's own genetic expression.

Last month of January I found out about stocktwits.com and been reading about «GENE» also known as Genetic Technologies and saw it going up more on the trending page then 100 % sometimes even 150 + + % a day and so I sold (which was stupid)

It is well known that purebred dog breeds are associated with differing susceptibility to specific malignancies, suggesting that selected breeds of dog are inheriting «at risk» alleles for very few genes, perhaps even a single gene, with a profound effect.

Anyone who has studied genetics, even at an introductory level, knows that certain dominant genes may actually be dormant for a generation.

You do not even want to know what we are doing by allowing the USDA to unleash a genetically engineered rabies virus live virus chimera into the environment without not one gene impact study to validate the methodology.