Sentences with phrase «even lack of warming»

He did not ever refer to cooling or even lack of warming in the last decade, and I defy you to find a direct quote from him where he did.]

Not exact matches

Since ski season is upon us (even though there is a lack of snow on the mountains), I thought it would be helpful to share some packing essentials to stay warm & still look chic!

Still, Miracle of Morgan's Creek is a prime example of the genre and Golden Age Hollywood comedy... even if it lacks the warm heart at the center of Sullivan's Travels (1941).

The movie attempts to provide a variation on the «buddy movie» arrangement with the two characters never fully warming to one another, but there's such a complete lack of chemistry between Kang and Stallone that we don't believe in even a little grudging respect.

And so we come to the end of our list and what better way to finish off than with Marc Forster's WORLD WAR Z. Now, I will admit that at first I was not the biggest fan of the film due to its lack of blood, lack of traditional zombie characteristics and its over-commercialization, however I have come to warm to it for a number of reasons that even I can't overlook.

But to cower in elegant homes behind golden garden gates, fearful lest the breath of warm humankind touch you, unable to indulge in extravagances for fear they might be glimpsed by the embittered oppressed, to oppress and yet lack the courage to show yourself as an oppressor, even to fear the ones you are oppressing, feeling ill at ease in your own wealth and begrudging others their ease, to resort to disagreeable weapons that require neither true audacity nor manly courage, to have money, but only money, without splendor: That's what things look like in our cities at present

They may lack refinement, but even if you can't «feel» your tyres warm up in Turn 10's game, the model here remains an unquestionable accomplishment within the realm of console driving mechanics.

Curry uses the lack of data to attribute all the early 20th century warming to internal variability which she then projects willy - nilly onto the late 20th century to provide 50 % of the warming since 1950 and perhaps even amplifies it to allow for the continuing warming and / or attribution of more - than - 50 % of post-1950 warming to internal variability.

@» the lack of heating», the best comment was from a Royal Society spokesman in 2007 around the time of the Keenlyside «AMOC shutdown» simulation... «global warming could pause... even for a decade».

With even further warming more hydrates are released, additional global soil feedback (extreme soil respiration rates, compost bomb instability) and weathering becomes a driver, now Ocean very stratified, maybe things like permanent El Nino, weather systems probably move very slow — everything gets stuck due to lack of perturbed ocean, no or very little frozen water at the poles.

People lacking credentials or even real names are trying to persuade readers here to believe their version of warming trends and CO2's relationship to the greenhouse effect.

For example, under the AGW paradigm it is assumed that the lack of warming over the last decade or so is merely temporary, even though it can't be explained at this time.

Even as many promoting the global - warming theory have moderated their language in the interest of restoring credibility, others on the same side of the table have actually employed more alarmist language, as if to compensate for the lack of climatic temperature increase by turning up the verbal heat.

The United States delegation even weighed in, urging the authors of the report to explain away the lack of warming using the «leading hypothesis» among scientists that the lower warming is down to more heat being absorbed by the ocean — which has got hotter.»

While such a «missing heat» explanation for a lack of recent warming [i.e., Trenberth's argument that just can not find it yet] is theoretically possible, I find it rather unsatisfying basing an unwavering belief in eventual catastrophic global warming on a deep - ocean mechanism so weak we can't even measure it [i.e., the coldest deep ocean waters are actually warmer than they should be by thousandths of a degree]...

Now it turns out the lack of warming has gone on for so long that even throwing in a one or two - year spike into it is not going to induce a significant warming trend in that data,» Michaels noted.

Even the IPCC folks admit (privately) problems with their global - warming - due - to - anthropengic - increases - in - CO2 trope, with Kevin Trenberth agonizing over the fact that the «world's top scientists» are not able to account for the lack of warming.

There are even early indications that 2017 could end up as warm as 2016, or nearly so, despite the lack of El Nino.

Also, using the same cherry picking approach as used by «skeptics» for the recent time period, based on which they claim a «global warming stop» or «pause» because of lacking statistical significance of a warming trend, I even could claim a «pause» in global warming from 1979 to at least the end of 1997.

All of these enviro - whackpot prognosticators of a global warming Apocalypse lack the intellectual curiosity to even wonder how there can be so much evidence - backed, statistically significant research showing that all past and historical global warming is completely explained by ENSO effects and other natural activity.

Even Kevin Trenberth has recognized the «unexplained lack of warming», which he called a «travesty».

I've never been happy with the vagaries of the residence time of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere and the lack of any lag between the industrialized northern hemisphere and the southern when charting anticipated Anthropogenic CO2 warming effects...... The AGW hypothesis is full of inconsistencies and problems that were never even address or explained, just hand waved away or ad hoc - ed with another hypothesis.

For it to have any credibility whatsoever, it will need to address the issue head on and very very convincingly (AR4 completely missed the lack of warming, even though it was under its nose... black mark!).

«Since 1997, when Pinatubo's aerosol settled out, the stratosphere has been exceptionally clear... Half or more of the warming since 1995 may due to the lack of large volcanic eruptions... That's about 0.13 °C... The remaining climate change is presumably caused by other forces, such as solar variability, El Nino, Atlantic AMO warming in 1995, lower Albedo and maybe even a little greenhouse gas.»

For example, Jones agreed with the BBC interviewer that there had been «no statistically significant warming» since 1995 (although he asserted that the warming was close to significant), whereas in his 2005 email he was at pains to hide the lack of warming from the public and even fellow researchers.

Even veteran «manmade climate disaster» alarmists Phil Jones and Kevin Trenberth admit that they «can't account for the lack of warming,» which they call «a travesty.»

But what with evidence somewhat lacking on positive CO2 feed backs, the present temperature plateau continuing, model projections of warming way out with observation, the analogy appears a bit, well, Ehrlichean, seems to me.And then there's the bleeding of economies by costs of CO2 reduction measures and subsidizing ineffectual, (evidence indicates even un-environmental) renewable energy policies, no gain for lotsa» pain.

So, even before I ponder what the mechanism for this observed «lack of warming» could be, I conclude that there must be a «mechanism» which is working against and even overpowering the posited GH mechanism.

Even China's coal - burning is offered to explain lack of global warming.

Apparently you refuse to respond to Al Gore celebrity status as a main advocate [perceived authority] RE: the theory of man - made CO2 caused global - warming - who is a famous politician w NO formal scientific training [FYI: Gore's far more famous the either Dr Dyson & even most of these 49 ex-NASA vets]- nor will you respond to IPCC Head Pachuari's lack of expertise in climatology.

Mann (2008), nor his paper referees nor his defenders have ever had a problem with lack of proxy data nor even truncating and replacing proxy data that goes against the modern day warming trend (divergence).

«The trend in sea ice decline, lack of winter recovery, early onset of spring melting, and warmer - than - average temperatures suggest a system that is trapped in a loop of positive feedbacks, in which responses to inputs into the system cause it to shift even further away from normal.

The scientific evidence is unequivocal: There exist huge regional climate swaths of the globe that have mildly warmed in an unexceptional manner during the modern industrial / consumer era; and there exist multiple large areas that even lack any regional climate - significant modern warming whatsoever.

I'd opine further that the result generally is that someone makes themself idiotic *, as when our friend Victor painted himself into a position where he was unable to acknowledge, or perhaps even to see, that a «lack» of air conditioning can indeed be determinative of a warmer room under some circumstances.

«even if all the commitments in the current NDCs [national pledges of action] are met — an uncertain prospect, given the lack of financial and technological resources from wealthier countries — they would lead to a warming of about 3 °C.»

I even think I saw some wag in a recent paper (sorry I forgot where) arguing that there were so many excuses for a lack of warming, that the logical conclusion from the model - data discrepancy was that sensitivity was actually higher than the models say!

Even today, sulfate levels have not fallen much below where they were in the late 1960's, at the height of the global cooling phenomena, and higher than most of the period from 1940 to 1979 where their production is used to explain the lack of warming.

However, the lack of an apparent robust statistical correlation linking observed temperature to observed atmospheric CO2 makes the case for CO2 causation for the observed warming weak, and the case for AGW as a potential threat even weaker.

The lack of statistical significance in temperate trends since 1998 is at least partly a statistical power issue - there is not enough data (since 98) to achieve a statistically significant result, even if there has been warming.

For lack of a better word, you'd have to provoke the machine to really be bothered by the heat: The warmest area is at the top of the chassis, and even then, you'd have to be sticking your hand near the vents to feel it.