Not exact matches
«
Even though a very
large quake has already happened this year, the hazard has not vanished,» says Gavin Hayes of the US Geological Survey in Golden, Colorado.
But the release of stress from this latest
quake does not relieve the risk of an
even larger earthquake expected further north.
That, says Parsons, means that
even megaquakes shouldn't trigger
large quakes more than a couple of thousand kilometres away.
«Such
large faults could
even have the potential of a magnitude 8
quake,» said geologist Christopher Sorlien of the University of California at Santa Barbara, who is not a co-author on the new paper.
This regularity could shed light on the workings of tectonic plate boundaries called subduction zones, and it might
even turn out to herald a season of heightened risk for
larger quakes.
* Update, 3 April, 11:05 a.m.: On the
evening of 2 April, after this story was posted, two more
large quakes occurred within the Iquique seismic gap.
«If it's been a long time since a
large earthquake, then,
even after another
quake happens, the fault's «memory» sometimes isn't wiped out, so there's still a good chance of having another,» said Seth Stein, the study's senior author and the William Deering Professor of Geological Sciences in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences.
Are the
quakes ones that would happen anyway, perhaps
even larger, in the future?