«And that means you're going to get
even less investment, because they are looking at future tax rates.»
Not exact matches
There are
even more abstruse explanations, for example, that computer equipment accounts for a growing portion of capital
investment but has become
less expensive over time, meaning fewer dollars spent.
A typical
investment in localization generally represents
less than 1 percent of total
investment in marketing or R&D,
even including staffing and technology costs.
Even then the project was huge and risky — an $ 11 billion terminal and a $ 7 billion pipeline to a still - developing gas play banking on the hope that the extraction, shipping, and liquefaction costs would combine to be
less than global LNG prices and allow a return on
investment.
If you're talking about a new project with no significant
investment already deployed, building a new mine if you expect today's prices to hold in the long term is a tough call — a 50 - year oil sands project is a lot of risk for
less than a 10 % rate of return — but
even there, you can see the impact of the lower Canadian dollar and the hedge provided by a royalty regime which lowers rates when prices are low.
If you're talking about a new project with no significant
investment already deployed, building a new mine if you expect today's prices to hold in the long term is a tough call — a 50 year oil sands project is a lot of risk for
less than a 10 per cent rate of return — but
even there, you can see the impact of the lower Canadian dollar and the hedge provided by a royalty regime which lowers rates when prices are low.
The debts created by businesses, consumers and national economies cutting back their long - term direct
investment leaves these entities
even less able to carry their mounting debt burden.
The reality is that the bitcoin
investment is less than 5 % of my overall portfolio, so hopefully this assures me that I won't be eating dog food even if my investment in the Bitcoin Investment Trust goe
investment is
less than 5 % of my overall portfolio, so hopefully this assures me that I won't be eating dog food
even if my
investment in the Bitcoin Investment Trust goe
investment in the Bitcoin
Investment Trust goe
Investment Trust goes to zero.
Shell Offshore Inc. (Shell), a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell plc, today announces the final
investment decision for Vito, a deepwater development in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico with a forward - looking, break -
even price estimated to be
less than $ 35 / bbl.
One reason is simply travel and logistics; it is easier for
investment firms (most of which have at least a branch office in New York) to trek up to midtown and
even line up multiple family office meetings for the week, than it would be to fly or drive around California to the
less geographically concentrated family offices there.
It is difficult for participants in the Koscot program to recruit and retain distributors and sales personnel to work home routes and sell respondents» products doortodoor, hence, many participants can not
even recoup their
investment, much
less earn the represented profits set forth herein.
These
investments are
less likely to outpace inflation and could
even lose a significant amount of their value during high inflationary periods.
Even the most aggressive investor would prefer
less investment volatility.
In other words, from an America First perspective, efficiently allocating capital
investment to create the most value for the global economy is
less important than bringing that
investment into the United States,
even though it might be
less productive here.
At the same time, I saw that
even with tribesmen of varying
investment experience and knowledge here was a community which was
less focused / obsessed on «which stock» or «when i will get my target price» or «will you tell me what to buy» and more focused on rational discussions — analysis which can be understood clearly by visitors with basic
investment and stock market terminology knowledge.
I'll
even make the bold statement that P2P investing is
less risky than many other high - yield fixed - income
investments.
The financial services and
investment community was
even less engaged, staying mostly quiet on suggestions that it wield its considerable influence over gun merchants to encourage firearms - related changes.
Because investors are only human, they will often want to hold
less volatile
investments with their shares to smooth their returns over shorter periods,
even though it costs them money long - term.
The
investment implications for a more accessible,
less expensive reach into outer space could be plentiful and significant, with potential opportunities in fields such as satellite broadband, high - speed product delivery and perhaps
even human space travel.
This will allow you to lay up
even more treasure for yourself, and best of all, the government only taxes
investment income at 15 %, which is
less than they tax the poor schmuck who works at McDonalds.
If the existing attitude prevails but a different manager is selected and put in place — it'll continue as is surely, but with someone
less able to
even secure a top 4 the minimal
investment.
Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any
less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that
even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't
even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his
investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions
I think the pressures to get points and win trophies in an immensely competitive environment where winning trophies is increasingly shaped by the massive
investment in squads in Manchester, Chelsea and
even Liverpool - left Wenger and his philosophy in its wake — he tried but with
less than half the
investment of United and City and hundreds of millions
less than Chelsea and Liverpool, it became increasingly difficult for him to play Wengerball.
In fact when we add our contrarian filter to the mix and look at home teams receiving
less than 40 % of public bets, this system becomes
even more advantageous with a 96 - 68 record — good for 23.28 units earned and a 14.2 % return on
investment (ROI).
Even at such a bargain price the
investment made by Brendan Rodgers in January 2013 was still something of a gamble, though perhaps
less so than subsequent deals for the likes of Mario Balotelli, and the Northern Irishman has done well to nurture Coutinho and show him enough faith to help the player mature into a real world - class talent.
Even though the return on
investment (ROI) steadily climbs as we look at increasingly one - sided public action, betting against the public isn't profitable unless the team is receiving
less than 25 % of spread bets.
The return on
investment (ROI) gradually improves as you take each step down the ladder, but
even at 30 % or
less, it's barely profitable.
which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez,
even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing
less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott,
even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly
even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period...
even if just from an
investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course
Even though the return on
investment (ROI) steadily climbs as we look as increasingly one - sided public betting, betting against the public isn't profitable unless the underdog is receiving
less than 25 % of spread bets.
«The proposed tax credit deferral would exacerbate that devaluation
even further, since investors would not be able to use New York's tax credits for three years, thereby making them a
less attractive
investment.
«While many people fear that decriminalisation will lead to increased use, there is little evidence to support such fears, and
even less evidence that the current punitive sanctions provide any sort of positive return on
investment for society.»
Even though parks in communities such as Mott Haven are arguably more important to residents, they received
less investment in the past, de Blasio said.
And
even though parks in
less advantaged communities were
even more important to those residents, they got the least
investment.»
This outlook might mean a
less research - intensive economy,
even as other nations are pointedly ramping up their own
investments.
So
even though the North American canola business is valued at over $ 2 billion and the calculated economic benefit of the new technology is over $ 200 million, the company value before
investment may be
less than $ 500,000.
Cash gives you the flexibility to stress
less,
even with the ebbs and flows of business cycles, and also not rely on debt or long - term
investments to cover your short - term needs.
There's
even an option through PayPal at registration that allows you to take advantage of a «6 months — no interest» option if you'd like to spread out that
investment further (
less than $ 75 / month).
World Singles was operating on fumes; I think that my initial
investment was a mere 10 or 12 thousand dollars with
even less in reserves.
•
Even if they are more effective or
less costly, or both, will they earn profits that are comparable to the returns on other
investments?
Should you consider a 2012 Jeep Wrangler for aggressive off - roading, the top - of - the - line Rubicon,
even with a Monroney of $ 40,000, is an absolute steal when comparing its
investment to that of upgrading a
lesser Wrangler through the four - wheel - drive aftermarket.
(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds of listings on the Vault, and as a result of doing so, won't see one thin dime of income on the site until October or later - Given all the time and money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't
even expect to earn back my upfront
investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf of authors who are listed in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any of those contacts result in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to
less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow authors.
It's not impossible for an audiobook to take off
even if the ebook didn't (Torrent actually sells fairly well for me, given that it's never been a big ebook seller and I haven't published a new installment in the series for several years), especially if it has a great cover, but chances are, you're not going to earn back your
investment on books that sell
less than 100 ebooks a month.
Rebecca Brandywyne spoke for many when she remarked: «the hard reality is that the vast majority of authors can not earn
even a comfortable - much
less a luxurious - living from their writing careers, and, unless they have access to other sources of funding (such as a working spouse,
investments and dividends, or an inheritance), are frequently compelled to take other jobs as their primary means of financial support.»
The account value is subject to market fluctuations and
investment risk so that, when withdrawn, it may be worth more or
less than its original value
even when an optional protection benefit rider is elected.
That's why inverse ETFs can be terrible
investments,
even if they're held for
less than year.
We are
even less enthusiastic about high yield ETF
investments in high - yield («junk») corporate bonds.
Older investors or investors with short time frames, who will be using their
investment income soon, will want safer,
less volatile
investments,
even if this means the returns are lower.
We fear that some of the reinsurers are taking on what we call «too smart for your own good» risk, and that hedge fund
investments will prove to be
less diversified than they expected in a crisis, perhaps
even a crisis with insurance claim applications, like 9/11.
As you near your 70s, you might
even consider holding up to 70 % of your
investments in bonds and fixed income assets that are
less volatile.
And if your riskier
investments flame out, you could get
even less.