The particles could have acted like a shield, blocking out the sun and preventing some radiation from evaporating water on the planet's surface, resulting in
even less rainfall.
Not exact matches
Climate models agreed
even less on how the conflicting daily changes affect annual mean
rainfall.
This should melt the glaciers
even faster, and might bring the additional problem of
less rainfall because of climatic changes.
Even though the sea is certainly warm enough for swimming at this time of year, the intense
rainfall might make the sunshine
less enjoyable.
Even a duck at half the size is a pretty frightening prospect as we in Western Australian Agriculture are dealing with much lower and
less predictable
rainfall.
They can't
even predict the next decade, much
less ten decades; despite tuning they only poorly replicate the historical climate; their equations can't be shown to converge; the number of tunable parameters is far too large for comfort; they show absolutely no skill at regional scales; their results for things they are not tuned to replicate (e.g.
rainfall) are abysmal — in short they are glorified Tinkertoy ™ models which have one common characteristic... they don't work well.
However,
even if East Africa will see more
rainfall instead of
less, it's likely to come in bigger bursts — i.e. flooding — instead of the dependable rain needed for communities.
This would lead to lower relative humidity and
less rainfall over land according to my sense of it, and this drying would accelerate land warming
even more.