Sentences with phrase «even less risk»

Statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that cats are rarely a source of disease, and that it is unlikely for anyone to get sick from touching or owning a cat.3 «Feral cats pose even less risk to public health than pet cats because they have minimal human contact, and any contact that does occur is almost always initiated by the person,» says Ackerman.

Since many of the major issues are off of the table, there is even less risk.

To analyze the impact, the key for Ibbotson and Idzorek was to find a long - lasting dimension of unpopularity that would deliver the greatest excess future return while perhaps allowing investors to take on even less risk.

Because next season will prove that you can still make a lot of money with even less risk and lower wages, due to having no top players (yes I'm beyond sure Sanchez and Ozil will move out).

Not exact matches

«As hackers devise more advanced and less recognizable threats, organizations that continue to settle for cybersecurity strategies that rely on a «feeling» of security are taking even greater risks in the coming year.»

Instead, people who fall into this category place less value on personal relationships, and are more likely to advance their own interests (read: pay and promotion) even at the risk of upsetting social harmony.

If you're talking about a new project with no significant investment already deployed, building a new mine if you expect today's prices to hold in the long term is a tough call — a 50 - year oil sands project is a lot of risk for less than a 10 % rate of return — but even there, you can see the impact of the lower Canadian dollar and the hedge provided by a royalty regime which lowers rates when prices are low.

Moreover, the possibility that the Company might sell Wynn Boston Harbor for less than its full long - term value in an attempt to «mitigate risk» by limiting the investigation is of even greater concern.

Indeed, this duration of couchification is the most telling aspect of the study: Those who got up more frequently — presumably, even to stand and fetch the cable remote... or a glass of water in the kitchen, let us hope — were less at risk.

As I will discuss, the risk of distortion and inaccuracy is amplified because start - up companies, even quite mature ones, often have far less robust internal controls and governance procedures than most public companies.

If you're talking about a new project with no significant investment already deployed, building a new mine if you expect today's prices to hold in the long term is a tough call — a 50 year oil sands project is a lot of risk for less than a 10 per cent rate of return — but even there, you can see the impact of the lower Canadian dollar and the hedge provided by a royalty regime which lowers rates when prices are low.

The fact that this ratio is now at the bottom band for most broadly defined stock indices suggests that the risk of continued underperformance by the broad market - versus large - cap indices - is substantially less than it was on April 5th, or even June 30th, when the most recent downdraft started.

It's true that you can make a heck of a lot more being entreprenurial, but it leaves out a lot of the costs / risks along the way that are priced into the return you get vs. a wage (and a lot of people would prefer the less - risky wage route, even with a degree from a private college).

But for a huge media conglomerate like Disney, even that kind of success isn't enough, especially when Disney knew that a licensing model would mean higher margins and less risk than running an internally - funded effort that shoulders responsibility for marketing, distribution, toy production, physical inventory, and a 300 - person game development studio.

Even though there is risk involved with every business, having a home - based business tends to be less of a financial risk.

Although this suggests less apathy than even a few months ago, it is still modest given the many sources of geopolitical risk.

It also carries less risk since you do not need to worry about the stock price going down since you are already earning even if you do not sell the stocks itself.

Besides, lenders take even more risk by offering loans to borrowers with damaged credit, and the terms are less competitive.

With tax - free savings accounts, holders face less risk even if they make withdrawals early in retirement.

As I've noted before, for an investor looking to capture all the market's long - term returns with substantially less downside risk, it would actually have been enough, historically, to simply step out of the market on a price / peak multiple of 19 and then wait for a 30 % plunge before repurchasing stocks, even if that meant staying out of the market for years in the interim.

Though I certainly wouldn't advise it as a strategy, investors would have historically outperformed the S&P 500 with much less risk than a buy - and - hold simply by selling stocks when the S&P reached 19 times earnings and staying in T - bills until the P / E reverted to 15, even if it took years to do so.

But even if so, a refresher is useful in order to help remind oneself about «how trading really works», and how long - term success is actually achieved (Hint: It has less to do with «signal generation» and much more to do with «money management and risk management»).

He runs the risk, then, like the Apostle Peter, of denying the Lord, even if he is present to us and speaks in His name; the holiness of the hierarchy of Mother Church is obscured, making it less fertile.

Even more surprisingly, the review found that people who «indulge» with full - fat milk either weighed less, gained less weight or otherwise had a lower risk for obesity then those who avoided fatty dairy.

Some of the benefits of eating more plants and less meat, include: reduction in cholesterol levels, blood pressure, certain cancers, heart disease risk and they have even shown those who eat more plants are happier.

Laden with antioxidants and containing 80 % less caffeine, it promises to reduce the risk of heart disease, stroke, neurological decline — and even certain cancers.

Absolutely right there He won't go anywhere because he does what the board wants him to He delivers profit and very low risk and sets expectations at virtually zero so that's the fans don't expect too m7ch and he doesn't have to deliver and the board don't need to spend Its a farce and more importantly a blatant con Every single fan who puts even a penny into the club either through season tickets right the way down to buying a mug or a pen or a shirt is being robbed by a board who care NOTHING for sporting glory and even less for the fans who finance the club There SHOULD be mass walkouts on home games and protests at every turn but, there won't be because the demographic of fans now is of a majority who are not true supporters but millennial who only want to say they attend the ground every other week.

Morata is even less of a risk than this guy.

From 2007/8, there was no superstar, talk less of world class, in the squad, but it was never this bad, even with watching at risk of heart attacks of those days.

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

If he waits there is the risk of injury, declining or even teams having less money.

Bottom line is if you stuck 100 world goalkeeping experts in a room I would be surprised if less than 90 % of them would declare PC is a better all - round GK than DO — and even though there are some risks it is an # 11M no - brainer.

Because pit strategy becomes even more crucial as leaders run the risk of getting stuck behind midfielders, but most importantly, pit stops (and the laps surrounding them) become less predictable.

Peer pressure can be dangerous, in a lot of ways, and though getting shin splints might seem a lot less of a risk than trying to drive buzzed or going to that college party, they can turn into a serious and even life - long condition.

There are some points i think he has not taken into consideration, he runs the risk of losing his place in the England squad because he will get even less game time at Liverpool, which will affect world cup dreams.

«VBACs carry a less - than -1-percent increased risk of a uterine rupture, which could cause brain damage in the baby or even death, according to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists.»

And as Johnson and Loscocco note, married black couples are at greater risk of divorce; they have lower marital happiness and satisfaction than white spouses; they disagree more than white spouses about such things as sex, kids and money; and black women get less benefits from marriage than white women and even black men do.

By the end of this week, the risk of miscarriage is down to below 2.5 % and even less if a live embryo has been seen at an ultrasound scan.

This is why even breastfed babies are at risk for obstructed airways — BUT - breastfed babies are at LESS RISK for illness, allergies and disease because they normally receive immunological and nutritional benefits from breastmilk (IF the mother is healtrisk for obstructed airways — BUT - breastfed babies are at LESS RISK for illness, allergies and disease because they normally receive immunological and nutritional benefits from breastmilk (IF the mother is healtRISK for illness, allergies and disease because they normally receive immunological and nutritional benefits from breastmilk (IF the mother is healthy!)

If what we think may be the lifelong benefits for babies of being BLW'd (better eating habits, less risk of obesity etc.) are to be proven — or even disproven — by research, then studies need to define clearly and unambiguously what «true» BLW is.

Now, I'll give the readers here credit for catching the part where they flashed up on the screen a nice graphic stating that you COULD put an extra ice pack or two into the lunch and probably «decrease the risk,» but I think talking about how not even an ice pack, or refrigeration at many day cares, is enough to keep your child from possibly coming down with foodborne illness could be enough to make some less conscious parents throw up their hands in disgust and say «I give up.»

Here's my problem with HFCS... if there is even the slightest chance that it is bad for us and our children (which, less face it... there is more than a slight chance that it is), and especially when there are healthy, natural alternatives... why risk it?

What are the markers of an NCB cult member vs someone with a DIY ethic but no medical background who believes and repeats statements like «hospitals can deal with emergencies better but emergencies are less likely to happen at home so the risk evens out»?

Indeed, the rhetoric is nothing less than threatening, of any and all bedsharing parents even when risks are minimized; and the zeal and imprecise language which is being used by many technicians involved in what is considered «safe infant sleep» campaigns is over simplified to the point that it is inaccurate, misleading, and inappropriate, and is itself dangerous on many different levels, both politically and scientifically (see Gettler and McKenna 2010 available on this website).

In a soothing, authoritative tone, the guide further assured Lori and Theo that, if they adhered to the book's recommendations, their baby would sleep through the night by approximately 8 weeks of age, cry less than other babies and even have a reduced risk of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and learning disabilities down the road.

Get those three, even if you don't include any other risk factors, and the results should be less than 1.

«It decreases asthma and allergies in babies, decreases the breast cancer risk in mom and there's even an economic benefit because breastfeeding is less expensive than formula - feeding.»

When marijuana is legal but heroin is not, and authorities are honest about the relative risks, marijuana consumers are less likely to wish to attempt heroin, and even if they do, it will be more difficult to get by (because marijuana sellers won't be stocking heroin).

Many MPs think a fresh leadership battle could risk a less popular leader replacing Theresa May, and even throw up the prospect of Jeremy Corbyn getting into Downing Street - and wouldn't ever take that risk.

Jeremy Corbyn unites the true labour following, and these MPs that are so out of touch have now made themselves even less in tune with ordinary people now risk being abandoned — and its all their own doing.