Sentences with phrase «even less value»

When you factor in the fact that Starpoints cost approximately 2.28 cents each in this promotion I see even less value in the award chart... except possibly at the lower levels,

However, a redemption rate of one cent per point is the best you'll get, and some merchants offer even less value.

This 1.0 DTS - HD master audio presentation has even less value than usual, since the movie lacks a traditional score.

There is even less value to be had if you plan on betting on a pennant team.

They have taken on too much private and public debt which means that compared to the USD, their fiat currency has even less value in the future.

Not exact matches

This can even be a small coupon or freebie with a value of $ 10 or less, which they can use on any of your products or services.

«Even at their recent peak, their combined global market value was less than 1 percent of global GDP,» he said.

Women are less likely to receive challenging assignments, less likely to be relied on for input on important decisions, and therefore are less likely to believe their contributions are appropriately valued or that they are able to participate on an even playing field.

Instead, people who fall into this category place less value on personal relationships, and are more likely to advance their own interests (read: pay and promotion) even at the risk of upsetting social harmony.

The first one or two times you create a plan you may feel a little unsure of yourself and even less certain that what you're doing has value.

The stock tumbled to $ 18 — less than half its value a year earlier, even as the overall stock market continued to surge.

And plastic is becoming even more lightweight as companies introduce packaging that uses less material, resulting in containers that take up the same amount of space but offer less resale value to recyclers.

Moreover, the possibility that the Company might sell Wynn Boston Harbor for less than its full long - term value in an attempt to «mitigate risk» by limiting the investigation is of even greater concern.

As part of its pitch, the company explains to potential customers that the so - called «net present value» of a $ 7,000 saddle is actually less than the all - in cost of using an ill - fitting one — expenses that include frequent vet bills, replacement saddles and even the costs associated with the premature death of the animal due to saddle - related health problems.

Ironically, the trend of companies raising less capital actually enhances the importance of the initial round buy - in (both because that initial buy - in becomes less diluted meaning the first round price was that much more important and because even if an angel wants to buy up more in later rounds they'll have less of a chance to do so; I also believe that along with the trend of companies raising less capital we're also seeing earlier and somewhat smaller average exits — also enhancing the value of initial round buy - ins as fewer investors are truly swinging for the proverbial fence).

The 2002 - 2003 lows never actually reached even average valuations, much less historical medians, but we did observe enough value based on normalized fundamentals and improved market action to remove most of our hedges in early 2003.

We're looking for somebody who's curious about the many better - value destinations abroad where you can spend less to live better and even supplement your budget with a portable income like travel writing,» says Executive Editor of InternationalLiving.com, Jennifer Stevens.

Remember that value is separate from overall price, though — if you're just trying to trim costs as much as possible and not necessarily maximize every mile, you may be better off opting for coach, even when it offers less - than - excellent value.

Baupost doesn't go short because unlike going long when you can take advantage of a drop in the value of an undervalued security by just buying more, if your short even though you may be right that it's worth less then the trading price you can still go broke.

Unlike PMI, the private mortgage insurance you'd pay with most conventional loans, MIP never goes away, even after you pay your loan balance down to less than 80 percent of the home value.

These investments are less likely to outpace inflation and could even lose a significant amount of their value during high inflationary periods.

Covering up the error did not look like too bad an option at the time because stocks were priced at one - half of their fair value and so it was hard for anyone to imagine that prices could ever again rise even to fair - value levels much less to overpriced levels.

In other words, from an America First perspective, efficiently allocating capital investment to create the most value for the global economy is less important than bringing that investment into the United States, even though it might be less productive here.

Even in the tenth ZIP code down the list, Chattanooga, TN's 37402, the median home value has more than tripled, passing $ 574K from less than $ 169K in just 17 years.

The big takeaway from Figure 2 is that even if SolarCity grows revenue by 63 % compounded annually and achieves 11 % NOPAT margins for the next five years, the most Tesla should pay to ensure an ROIC equal to WACC is $ 3 / share, or 88 % less than the current market value.

If you hold out until the bond matured, you'll be paid the face value of the bond, even though what you originally paid was less than face value.

Finally, GM's quick repayment of the loans has whetted the appetite of some commentators (including DeCloet) for the ultimate repayment of the full government contribution. That would occur through the issuance of public equity by GM and Chrysler, creating a market for those stocks into which the government would presumably sell its shares. There is even some nefarious language in the rescue packages requiring the government to sell off its shares within specified, relatively aggressive timelines. The more I think about it, the less this makes sense — neither for the auto industry, nor for taxpayers. Why not hang onto the equity stake? If the companies recover and the equity gains market value, then the government will be able to claim that on its balance sheet (hence officially recouping the cost of its written - off contributions and creating a budgetary gain).

We have forgotten its devastating disregard, or even reversal, of current worldly values, and have allowed what we call «Western civilization» or «the American way of life» to become more or less God - fearing substitutes for the real thing.

your quote Rebecca «Kids are going to tend to automatically see «less value» even if they are not taught victims have less value» Of course they are that is why these teachings have so much damage.

Kids are going to tend to automatically see «less value» even if they are not taught victims have less value.

But if God were incapable even of self - surpassing, then no surpassing could contribute anything whatever to his value or mean anything to him, for to him there would be no more or less but just sheer value.

Even her monetary value was less (Lev.

Just this: knowing that ignores or papers over our individual and corporate human experiences of the cross is of little value and even less use in a world that testifies daily to the reality of such experiences.

If even the hard - core atheists failed to carry out their program of erasing every trace of transcendent values from their moral universe, then how much less can our soft - core atheists expect to accomplish such a goal?

Having different roles, complementary I like that, even a submissive roles, does not make the woman of any less value than the man.

All this being granted, Father Vagaggini said, it would appear that one can accept a further hypothesis: There is nothing to deny the fact that in the non-Christian religions even after Jesus Christ there have been elements, in greater or lesser number — whether of a ritualistic, institutional or doctrinal nature — with a positive value for salvation, in the sense that God makes use of them to effect the salvation of those persons of sincere faith who belong to these religions.

Even if each of these Gunners are sold for the mimum of there transfer value worth, the net spending for the Summer business would be around $ 20 - 30M, even less if Athletico make an incredible bid for SaEven if each of these Gunners are sold for the mimum of there transfer value worth, the net spending for the Summer business would be around $ 20 - 30M, even less if Athletico make an incredible bid for Saeven less if Athletico make an incredible bid for Santi.

He seems to value loyalty over location, but the fact that his family lives here will just give him even less incentive to leave.

Obviously if Sanchez and Ozil leave, there is no guarantee (especially with a new manager) that the replacement will be of same value, so I can settle for a little less (I'm being realistic here even though I want more).

I think it definitely is a positive for Crab's market value going forward for him to stick with Derek, even if that means taking slightly less now.

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

It's part of a larger pattern of mismanaging player - assets so conspicuously that you're forced to offload them for less than market value — at the end of the day, a professional team is a group of assets, and a huge part of managing a team is doing what you can to increase the market valuation of those assets — and that's where I call this «vendetta» and not «style,» because even a disciplinarian could offer little carrots like, y ’ know, an absolutely deserved All - Star nod (at ZERO cost to himself or the club) but instead chose to publicly flip his most gifted player the bird.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

Even lesser strikers than Giroud are now over valued let alone the better one.

I'd say, in such a scenario, buying a 60 - 70m player is probably better value for money, because even with the TV money, there will be less clubs able to buy at that value, hence inflation will not be as high.

You will rarely meet an Arsenal supporter who cares less about winning trophies and more about values as a club, but it did make me wonder whether some of the players even knew that there is a league title to play for.

Participants noted the change in political views to the fact that they have «more family - oriented views» as parents and that they care «more about traditional values» since having children, while others noted that even though they were «more pro-choice» before having kids, they're «now more pro-life» as parents and «less inclined to agree» with abortion rights.

These benefits include but are not limited to the power of the human touch and presence, of being surrounded by supportive people of a family's own choosing, security in birthing in a familiar and comfortable environment of home, feeling less inhibited in expressing unique responses to labor (such as making sounds, moving freely, adopting positions of comfort, being intimate with her partner, nursing a toddler, eating and drinking as needed and desired, expressing or practicing individual cultural, value and faith based rituals that enhance coping)-- all of which can lead to easier labors and births, not having to make a decision about when to go to the hospital during labor (going too early can slow progress and increase use of the cascade of risky interventions, while going too late can be intensely uncomfortable or even lead to a risky unplanned birth en route), being able to choose how and when to include children (who are making their own adjustments and are less challenged by a lengthy absence of their parents and excessive interruptions of family routines), enabling uninterrupted family boding and breastfeeding, huge cost savings for insurance companies and those without insurance, and increasing the likelihood of having a deeply empowering and profoundly positive, life changing pregnancy and birth experience.

In the Creating Shared Value report, Nestlé claims there were only 19 concerns about non-compliance with the WHO Code raised in 2011 and even less in 2010 and corrective action was taken in all cases.

So even though the North American canola business is valued at over $ 2 billion and the calculated economic benefit of the new technology is over $ 200 million, the company value before investment may be less than $ 500,000.