Sentences with phrase «even lets you choose»

I even let him choose what he wanted at meal times, which was normally whatever was on my plate.

Rent the Runway will even let you choose a second size in the same dress, so you're likely to find the perfect fit even without trying it on.

And the ereader allows the human reader to resize the text to suit herself and may even let her choose her own font size and background color.

In fact, it won't even let you choose the airports you need, since Korean Air doesn't fly between U.S. airports and London.

In fact, it won't even let you choose the airports you need, since Korean Air doesn't fly between U.S. airports and London.

Sometimes it'll even let you choose which of the two heroes to use and even which villain to face, but it doesn't affect an awful lot — with the exception of the last chapter as it has two endings.

The game even lets you choose from a small set of premade robots if you're not into building: a car, a mecha that walks like a chicken, a T - Rex that walks like a chicken, and a chicken that walks like a chicken.

Not exact matches

The silicon ear tips I chose do let in some ambient sound, which kept me feeling safe and aware of my surroundings, but even with some ambient sound, the crystal - clear sound coming through the earbuds wasn't impacted.

Before you choose to share an article yourself, Feedly even lets you see how many shares each article has already received, giving you a sense of «social proof» that others have found an article useful.

He told her she could choose to return whenever she was ready but that he wanted to let her know she helped the team even during her difficult first day back.

«A gift card lets the recipient not only choose what they want to buy, but it also gives them a chance to enjoy an experience, rather than figure out how to store things they probably won't even use.»

Let's see... believe in our God or you will be tortured for eternity... Believe in our God even if science and the fossil record refute our conclusions... Believe in our God who can do anything, it doesn't matter what you come up with, he can do it and don't you dare call it magic or fantasy... but don't test him either, he's not a performing monkey who does tricks to convince us he's real, we just have to have faith, but he could do anything if chose to...

Why would God let that happen would be because humanity was granted freedom to chose our own religious paths, even though they may be paths in which God would not want to see happen.

Because even though the phrase «going to church» kind of bugs me (we don't go, we are), and even though it's messy and imperfect, even though I've let them down and they have let me down, even though there are disappointments, even though I don't agree with everybody and they probably think I'm crazy sometimes, too, even though I don't think we need an official sanctioned Sunday morning thing to be part of the Body of Christ, because even though I think the Church crosses a lot of our self - made boundaries and preferences and gatekeepers, I keep choosing this small family out of hope and joy.

If I'm not interested in something, I don't even bother reading it, you should do the same and let those who have faith and belief to go about as they choose!

You even know how it will end and I am still letting you choose the option you prefer.

But one question, why did god only choose about a 25 % of the World's human population (and let's not even talk about other forms of life) to be given his message?

@ Simran: «why did god only choose about a 25 % of the World's human population (and let's not even talk about other forms of life) to be given his message?»

ausphor, Once again, I gave a purely logical argument against abortion, and instead of giving a sensible argument against it (which can not be done) you are choosing to let your bigotry shine, and attack my faith, which did not even enter into my discussion above.

Even 15 minutes extra has been tremendously therapeutic, for doing a little makeup, sipping coffee while the house is still asleep, answering emails and snuggling the pup (let's be real, I can choose one of those me - time activities per morning!).

Or, if you're serving them on let's say Easter Sunday, you could even just make a waffle bar with ALL the toppings and let people pick and choose!

Tossing these coconut chips with oil and sweetener is a fun hands - on activity — you can let your kids choose the seasoning, too, so they feel even more involved.

This was a long piece as it was, and rather than do a bio for everyone (and extend it even further) I chose to let the capos speak for themselves.

We need to change some players, even if they are good players to make our game more dinamic, more complete.If Walcott will leave, definetly Sterling is the right choose to play with Sanchez.If Bayern will want Ozil, I think we should let him go.I think mutch people will be not agree with this, Ozil is a great player BUT is not a complete player, doesn't have enough speed and is seems sometimes like he is not involved in the game.I think a switch with Gotze can be benefic for our team, he run alot, is creative and make the defensive as well.We need a Striker to, but a good one, someone like Benzema or Cavani, someome who can get at least 20 goals per season.A new DM is what we need for balance the game, I think Vidal is the best in the world in this moment (is just my opinion), he working hard in defence and can win a game with a long shot.This is the way I see footbal.

Van Gaal had the likes of Michael Carrick, Ander Herrera, Daley Blind and Marouane Fellaini to choose from in the centre last season, and none of these particularly let the team down when used, even if the Dutchman showed a willingness to rotate a lot throughout the campaign.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

All I hear my fellow Gunners spew on the Sanchez issue is that «we should let him go (which I agree) because nobody is bigger than Arsenal (which I find hard to believe) because Wenger has shown time & time again that he's bigger than Arsenal for overstaying even when its totally obvious that he delivers no more & even shows the arrogance of coming to say «nothing the fans do get to him & he will only leave in his own choosing» n still gets cheered on & supported by you blinded deluded lots but yet you chumps still come here to make noise about how nobody is bigger than Arsenal....

Thing is, something needs to change, Wenger leaving or Kroenke leaving, if Wenger leaves and we finish lets say 10th than Kroenke will sell, and Usmanov would take over and re build whole team, so its a win win situation, this constant loop we witness every year is boring, predictible even by Wenger standards, what would you choose, every year same 4th place and Wenger, or new Manager and mabye disaster but ending with Usmanov take over and rebuilding team, i know what would i take.

We need to change some players, even if they are good players to make our game more dinamic, more complete.If Walcott will leave, definetly Sterling is the right choose to play with Sanchez.If Bayern will want Ozil, I think we should let him go.I think mutch people will be not agree with this, Ozil is a great player BUT is not a complete player, doesn't have enough speed and is seems sometimes like he is not involved in the game.I think a switch with Gotze can be benefic for our team, he run alot, is creative and make the defensive as well (remember how he take the ball from Ribery at Dortmund).

I spent the After noon before he went to work On the 5th of November Promising the sex, The Vacations and holidays he wanted and to let him choose a position any place else on the next bid list that went up in two weeks then we might have a real married life The Next eight years was Armed intimidatrioion because nobody would face him other wise, Even that ended up with him remembering who held him at gun point then he would catch them in ambush and make sure they hurt very badly.

Let's get past that initial moment of judgment and be open to what others may want, even if it doesn't look like what we might choose or want.

Birthday memories: Each family member chooses his or her favorite birthday dinner menu, cake, outing, and Some families even hang the family member's shirt on a flagpole or broomstick stuck in the front lawn to let the world (or at least the neighborhood) know it's that person's special day.

Even if she doesn't immediately calm down at the sound of your voice, or you choose to let her fuss while you finally eat something — your replies and gestures let her know that her communication (crying) means something to you, and reassures her that she matters.

Let them guide and don't judge their choices, even if it's not what you would choose for them.

You can even labeling them with a quantity that kids are allowed to pack, or let them choose one item per bin.

Maybe your doctor has even «warned» you about this by saying «It's never too early to set them her up to be a good sleeper...» But whatever you are hearing, know this, if the advice you are getting (even from your doctor, even from your mom) doesn't sit well with you and your gut, you can choose to LET IT GO and trust yourself and what feels right to you instead.

In order to prevent or reduce jealousy, make sure you really play up the excitement of a separate room and let your toddler be involved with choosing new sheets and even room décor.

Even better, let your children choose their own portion sizes.

I'll let Ree explain the details, but even in lil ol' Elements 7.0, I can open JPEGs as Camera Raw files (use Open As, select your picture, and then use the drop - down menu to choose to open as a Camera Raw file).

He let her plan the whole evening, and she chose dinner and shopping at the nearby mall.

You can even let your kids choose the mix - ins.

Because the US is so polarized politically, there is very little chance that a Republican controlled House of Representatives would choose to impeach a Republican President even if there were overwhelming evidence that he had accepted a direct bribe from the Russian government (such as, for hypothetical example, a 19 % interest in the Russian gas company Rosneft) in return for promulgating policies favorable to the Russians, let alone confirmation of the allegations that his Presidential campaign had coordinated election strategy and tactics with the Russians.

All that was denounced as disgraceful and irresponsible at the time, but versions of the wider franchise have since extended to all three main Westminster parties — even the Tories, who let MPs pick the finalists but party members chose between them.

Let us, therefore, choose to do something even more immediate by saying, «We choose to restore the greatness of Houston, not because it is easy, but because it is right.

We know that Silicon Valley parents are choosing to raise their kids tech - free, and that even Steve Jobs wouldn't let his children use iPads.

Heck, I even let them make the decision to eat «un-healthy» food that I wouldn't choose for them so they learn about making good choices and accessing risk in real - time.

Why * let * the next two months set us back when we can stay on track, even get ahead if we choose?

For example, many people see a routine in my program or one of my colleagues programs (or even a magazine)... let's say the routine calls for 4 sets of 6 reps of a given exercise... and they just choose a random weight (or a weight that they «think» they are comfortable with) and do 4 sets of 6 reps.

We can however control how we react to particular events and choose to throw those heavy, dark and chaotic thoughts right out the window and instead, recognize that, even on the most trying and difficult of days we do have the power to step back and not let the negative stuff influence our feelings or cloud our perceptions.