In fact one could
even make the argument that the best trade for that type of situation is a long gold / short gold stocks position, but we digress.
Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to
even make our argument for inclusion»?
One could
even make an argument for Kale being the current It Vegetable, if there is such a thing.
You can
even make an argument that Savino's district would be heavily re-drawn.
Heck, if it's postworkout, I could
even make an argument for flavored Greek yogurt (in small amounts, from a low - sugar brand).
You could
even make an argument that it's just as important.
Perhaps you could make
even make the argument for Orochi, given how he feels regarding Nick's presence.
So, to
even make that argument you're admitting that public schools are worse than Charter schools, and will be for the forseeable future.
You could
even make an argument that both Kindle Fire and Nook HD are better hardware wise than iPad Mini.
Hell, you could
even make the argument that I'd be better off indexing, and I write about stocks for a living these days.
Some even make an argument that given their size they should be thought of as trailer homes.
When we reviewed the Honor View 10, we found it to be one of the best affordable flagships for just $ 500 — it held its own against the similarly priced OnePlus 5T, and you could
even make the argument that it's a better value than the more premium Huawei Mate 10 Pro.
One could
even make the argument that their first two devices (OPO and OP2) had a higher effective resolution, given they sported LCD panels that didn't lose definition from a Pentile subpixel arrangement.
One might
even make the argument that some of those people would actually hold off on pre-ordering new handsets from the likes of LG and Huawei because they'd want the Galaxy S8 to come out first so that they can check it out before they decide which flagship smartphone to spend their money on.
Not exact matches
Arguments that exchange - traded funds increase market volatility or can
even cause a market crash are popular these days, and the Facebook stock tanking provided one more chance for the ETF naysayers to
make their case.
(Notice I
made this entire
argument without
even mentioning Trump?)
But there's more going on here than poor planning and backroom
arguments — something that is
making even wary investors outside the corporate bond market sit up and take notice.
Klepper said he noticed while covering Trump rallies that the information, language, and
arguments that people were
making had less in common with Fox News and more in common with Breitbart News and
even the conspiracy - peddling Infowars.
While the attack Thursday was the first of its kind by the US, Lowther said the bomb was «not
even close to being a nuclear weapon» and he would «not
make the
argument that it's a symbol of escalation» in the conflict in Afghanistan.
With criticism of self - driving cars swirling, our hunch is that it's a staged video
made in the hopes of driving the
argument that autonomous vehicles are safe to get behind the wheel of,
even when you're asleep.
A few of the
arguments, like how the long lineups provide fans an opportunity to talk movies with their fellow attendees,
made sense
even though I wouldn't consider them a worthy tradeoff for all the other issues.
In future, the sharks» appetites might
even make people safer: Stingrays injure beachgoers on California's coast far more frequently than white sharks do, Lowe says, though he acknowledges that's a hard
argument to sell to a shark - phobic public.
The
argument could
even be
made that the more famous and rich people are, the higher their chance of being depressed.
This is because,
even if you have a heated
argument, as long as you keep in the back of your mind that the people you're arguing with do have the best in mind for the company and wider team, you'll always be able to
make it to the end and remain friendly.
The author is
making a really crappy
argument based on past trends and isn't
even doing the must fundamental statistical analysis.
In the conclusion to his original post, Damadoran
made a similar
argument, «it is worth remembering that
even smart investors can collectively
make big mistakes, especially if they lose perspective.»
The one major point in favor of your
argument that you didn't highlight is that most people using a Roth IRA assume that they'll
make more money in the future than they do today, thus realizing a lower tax rate by paying taxes now than they would have in the future (
even assuming tax rates stay constant).
Even among her Fed peers, she stands out as a nerd: «As Fed officials deliberated last April about how long to keep interest rates low, Ms. Yellen delivered a 20 - page speech, with 18 footnotes and 15 charts,
making the
argument that rates should stay low until 2015 or later,» writes WSJ Fed correspondent Jon Hilsenrath.
A central
argument I
make is that
even in the United States it is unlikely that we have left the zero lower bound behind.
Crowe: You could certainly
make that
argument, but if you're looking from a growth pipeline perspective, you could
even say that Spectra has more upside simply because their development portfolio has remained robust throughout the entire time, whereas Kinder Morgan over these past couple quarters has actually been trimming their backlog.
This fact
makes my
argument even more compelling.
He is particularly dismissive of
arguments making use of the slippery slope,
even as he unwittingly
makes them credible.
The irony of this whole big flap about Jesus is that He is just as mythical a figure as Santa Claus, maybe
even more so, thus
making the whole
argument moot.
Barack Obama is a Natural for the Catholic Vote» I can't quite follow the
argument he's
making; I'm not
even sure if there is an
argument.
I can't
even believe you
made that
argument....
You continue to attempt to pigeon hole me into a belief that
makes your
argument stronger
even when you and I have directly discussed otherwise.
like former leader... we too have kept open house and had people live with us long and short term for nearly all our married life... we've had debate,
argument, sadness, hilarity...
even had someone with a disturbing psychosis... not at one stage have we felt the need to
make any rules... that would almost be like copping out of relationship.
His
argument makes sense only if aimed at the Catholic bishops, and
even here it falls short because, if surveys are to be believed, most Catholics are not listening.
I love the
argument he
makes,
even while I am a progressive Christian who accepts homosexuals as equals in the eyes of God.
LA there is nothing wrong with
making an
argument that Jesus may have implied such a thing or
even that Jesus agreed with everything stated in the OT.
But
even without that data, a substantive
argument can be
made based on the natural law.
That is, should Jesus not have warned that His followers would face mockery, resistance, marginalization, and
even persecution, so that He could have prevented those enemies from
making the
argument you just did?
Therefore, the statement «
even the demons believe, and tremble» is NOT from James, and is NOT in support of his
argument, but is from someone who does not like what James is saying, and is objecting to the point James is
making.
If you
make good points, I may
even comment, or notify my blog readers that I am changing my views because of your compelling Scriptural and theological
arguments.
I wouldn't ever be one of you clowns who can't
even make it an entertaining
argument against your own beliefs just to verify it's validity.
Even with WWI, or even more so with Iraq I, where stronger cases can be for the importance of U.S. economic motivation, it becomes very hard to distinguish the «we must not let Germany control Europe» or «Iraq control the Gulf» - type argument made on geostrategic grounds, from the same argument made on economic grou
Even with WWI, or
even more so with Iraq I, where stronger cases can be for the importance of U.S. economic motivation, it becomes very hard to distinguish the «we must not let Germany control Europe» or «Iraq control the Gulf» - type argument made on geostrategic grounds, from the same argument made on economic grou
even more so with Iraq I, where stronger cases can be for the importance of U.S. economic motivation, it becomes very hard to distinguish the «we must not let Germany control Europe» or «Iraq control the Gulf» - type
argument made on geostrategic grounds, from the same
argument made on economic grounds.
It's the lying and deception that can destroy trust in these situations more than almost anything else, and the second episode
even makes it a point to try and get that across through slapstick humor, until it ditches that initial
argument altogether and starts becoming a wacky comedy in full with all of the usual trappings.
Another thing... if so called «pro-lifers» want to
make a reasonable
argument against those who are pro-choice or
even just on the fence, you might want to smarten up and take the religion out of your
argument.
And
even if all rough correlations could be
made smooth by convoluted
arguments about cloud covers and the like, the two Genesis accounts themselves, taken as chronologies, do not agree.
Equally important, the effort expended to develop each historical scenario draws attention
even further from the religious
argument that Paul is
making.