Other lawyers, client and peer comments and
even members of the judiciary are all potential sources for competitive ranking.
Not exact matches
Public opinion about the
judiciary is apparently that many, if not most judges are corrupt and
even members of the inner bar are on record suggesting that the bar, especially senior lawyers are perpetually engaged in compromising judges!
Haters
of truth and sentimentalists will call for Oshekomes head, byt will foolishly turn blind eyes to the fact that he have outlaid a child who depends on the father or relative being the invigilator to pass exams will always fail the exam on the day his father or relation is not in the exams hall, that is the case
of the EFCC and the FGN, they relied on the
judiciary to help them rubbish their opposition or faces they do not like, and have always lost cases because their candidates in the
judiciary were not assigned their cases and that is the same head
of EFCC Magu that the president keep nominating for confirmation,
even when reports indicted him, this recent looses have to confirm to doubting Thomas that Magu is just the best because he can do the dirty work for the APC and Buhari, not because he is the best in corruption fight, I wish there is a listening and discerning government in place back there in Nigeria, they would have known that there is a vacuum as far as EFCC is concerned and use the time to shop for a head that will deliver, it also confirms the fact that the «So called fight against corruption» Is a BIG lie and propaganda, just a wipe to flog opposition into their line, shame on the clapping
members and the O yes
members who will never hear any criticisms concerning Buhari or anything he does good or bad, bitter or sweet dem go swallow like that shaaaaa.
Even police officers and
members of the
judiciary declare as facts what are actually Daily Mail scare stories.
In the event that this legal action against Mr Hain succeeded
members of parliament and
even Ministers would feel extraordinarily constrained in any criticism they might make
of the judicial process and
judiciary in the United Kingdom.
Lord Judge may not speak for all
members of the
judiciary, but in an age where
even in the UK many more cases are available because courts send their judgments to free online services such as Bailii, it is worth remembering that not all that is reported has equal standing.
Berger supported both
of those bills
even after several advocates, legal professionals and
members of the
judiciary spoke out about the damage they would do to an independent
judiciary.
Juvenile shadenfreude aside -(and ignoring the double - edged ignorance
of lawyers and the
judiciary regarding the lack
of a scientific evidentiary basis for the use
of even contemporary «psychology» in law, much less Freud's poetic imagination)- yes
of course Woolley is right and Semple is as usual on - target --(and so consistently (oh how can I resist «Sempsible») he can be an honorary
member of Our Club.