Sentences with phrase «even money value»

Not exact matches

«Japanese companies have a lot of extra cash at hand because when there's deflation, the value of cash won't diminish even if they keep the money and not spend it on capital expenditure,» Iwata told Reuters in an interview in January.

Putting more money behind a program your employees already value would help them appreciate the benefit even more.

But anecdotal evidence, at least, suggests that directors often doubt the reliability and value of comp consultants, even after having paid good money for their advice.

The product is also advertised as having no risk, because it will not decrease in value even if the stock market loses money.

People are pouring money into cryptocurrency - based initial coin offerings, even though there are often no underlying assets with real value.

See a visual explanation of how young companies are valued, in some cases before they're even making money.

They classify your home and car as assets based on a perceived market value, even though they cost you money each month and can depreciate each day you own them.

What's more, the Citi strategists doubt whether the world even needs a new version of gold, when governments long ago stopped pegging the value of paper currency to the metal: «Is a fixed supply of money, a digital gold standard, really superior to a flexible money supply?»

Even on initial conversations, it becomes evident whether the investment of time and money with you will add value to what is already in place.

The two - step process had the effect of inflating the values even higher (and letting the syndicators make money on the sale too).

Even if you knew what earnings would be next year... A fair value P / E ratio of 15 makes more sense The pool of money that's sitting in cash worldwide has never been greater.

«I generally always try to buy under market value with real estate so even if the market is flat or not growing I still make money because there is some in built - in equity buffer, although this is getting harder in the current market.»

In theory, you could hold an individual bond to maturity and never lose any money even though the market value of the bond may fluctuate based on changing interest rates and other factors (but you could still lose out to inflation over time).

Over the years, however, a belief has taken hold that companies» primary objective is to maximize shareholder value, even if that means paying out now through buybacks and dividends money that could be put toward long - term productive investments.

What is interesting to see with this bitcoin hype is how uneducated writers still are when it comes to the question of what money actually is — especially the assumption that money, e.g. US Dollars, are tied to any real world values like gold is one of these modern fairytales that is repeated often — I can not understand that even after the big corporate crimes (aka as «financial crisis») that US Citizens cost millions of dollars there is still such a lack of understanding of what money actually is.

But without any guidance, it is difficult for us to understand the value of handling our money and using it to make even more.

This provides a unique angle to real estate investing, which often uses leverage, whereby a buyer borrows against most of a property's value to gain income from the property, even though the buyer only put part of the money into the property.

That certainly doesn't imply that equally catastrophic losses are likely to follow (stocks lost 85 % of their value from 1929 to 1932 as valuations collapsed from historic highs to historic lows, and keep in mind that even moving from a 70 % loss to an 85 % loss involves losing half of your money, which is why I insisted on stress - testing in 2009).

Even though in this example the December - 2016 futures contract is still $ 1 above the spot price, there is a profit to be had because the cost of storage plus the time value of money amounts to significantly more than the $ 1 / barrel futures premium.

This means that if you «time» your trade wrong and the value of XRP goes down after you make the exchange, you still owe tax on your BTC gain even though you subsequently lost money.

But as the newest member of the Money Map team, Tom is now able to show you how he uses the Money Calendar tool every week in Money Calendar Pro, in which Tom pulls back the curtain on how a real trade analyst works, and takes you step - by - step through his daily trade recommendations poised to double, or even triple, in value.

Perhaps your deferred taxes have grown so large as a result of a very small cost basis that selling and switching into an investment you expect to earn even three percentage points or more over the next decade will actually cost you money as a result of the principle value lost to the IRS.

If your improvements add more value to the homethan they cost, you may even make money when you sell.

But even more importantly, aside from being a long - term store of value, gold is a hedge — a form of money that acts as an insurance policy against a dangerously overleveraged financial system.

Imagination has deep value for humanity but tends to take a back seat in the minds of many even while the same people ritualistically follow sporting events or spend money to sit in the pews of the movie theatre and watch sermons delivered by fantasy (past) or superhero (present) or science fiction (future) movies.

Even individuals, when they do such planning as budgeting for their financial needs, work in order to place meals on their tables, decide where to send children to school or do shopping in order to get the value for their money et cetera, they are involved in politics.

Because it operates in the hard - hit auto industry area, Redmer explains that it's even more important that their customers receive a good value for their money.

My Dad would explain things about stocks when he was watching the news, so even though we didn't totally get it, we began to understand the value of money.

I agree with you 100 % Welbeck is a total waste of money and time he was brought in without the manager even being present from a direct competitor who clearly felt he had no value whatsoever.

Like I said once, twice or several other times, we could pay actual worldcalss players 100k and get the exact value for our money, even more value.

We needed to take a gamble on lacazette what if he has a phenomenal season and his value goes even higher.Anyways i am not a real arsenal fan who spend their money on season ticket or buy their merchandise so i should shut up.

The amount of money you would have to pay them, if you pay them a certain amount they would have to get that much money and even more because of taxable benefit issues just to pay for the value of their scholarship.

To name a few additional struggles: we have to compete with the richest league in the world where every team has money and isn't begging for transfers of their best players to fund themselves (8/20 of the highest valued teams), we have a poor injury record that is being addressed, we have far fewer homegrown talents in our league, the overall league quality is higher even if the highest teams are not of the quality of other top teams, selling of our best players during the past decade has lead to a lack of momentum and yes, there has been times where our manager got it wrong.

with his attitude as if we have to be his servant, get back to Chilie and get those life values back, he is a football player, but a man first, and as a player and man, his all attitude sucks, i don't know why wenger kept him and take that shit, means we have to take it... I told yo before, get his ass on training camp, ruining all day, shut him up, keep him out of the squad, not even in bench to bring his laim superior attitude... All money he is making, he should think of Chilie street and reality for kids he was once... He is in a great city, a club that won in this league and would be in CL as every year without this type of laim ways... So, of course no one wants him around during that ceremony, not even in the room... Get real sanchez, you came from misery, benched for years by gardiola too, sell out, poor minded..

For me, Coquelin remains a vital part of our team even if we need a new CM, Coquelin still has a lot to offer us and because he doesn't cost us money doesn't take away his value...

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Lacazette is one of our few options out there so I will be happy if this happens If I were Wenger I would also get Mahrez Lacazette and Mahrez would be # 70 - 80 million well spent and better value for money than # 80 mil for Higuain Both are 25 years old with time to get even better, Mahrez has PL experience.

Few can match that instinctive touch in the penalty area, but it seems even the wealthiest clubs in the Premier League do not believe they'd currently be getting value for money for this proven performer.

She provides some great value at 10/1 compared to Serena's near even - money payout.

Ivan has said Wenger is clueless when it comes to player values so even if Wenger wanted to spend some of that money... if Ivan thought the deal was too high priced then it will not happen.

It doesn't matter how much money a club has, even the biggest and richest of the Premier League giants will be hoping to secure value - for - money in deals this summer, with both Manchester City and Chelsea featuring on our list of five bargain deals that could go through this summer.

Given their 13 wins last season and the fact that their two star rookies should in theory get better this season, even I feel like there may be some value at that plus - money payout.

Did Alabama slip away, or is it possible that there's still value on an even money team?

I'm glad Danny is proving all the sceptic fans (when he signed) wrong and is offering us the value that a big money signing (Falcao) maybe didn't even bring along.

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

Even if we are customers to them, we're not getting value for money.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Our valuation places the Jaguars at 5.281 wins this upcoming season and this 0.219 differential doesn't even qualify as one of the ten largest values, however, receiving plus money on this bet adds tremendous value.

For the Cin / Ind game, the Bengals +3 (receiving 16 % of spread bets) have value due to our 80/20 betting system, but it looks like oddsmakers must be receiving a fairly even distribution of money since that line hasn't moved despite this one - sided betting.

These sharp money indicators and betting system matches clearly show that San Diego is offering value, but there are even more reasons to like the Chargers this weekend.