Sentences with phrase «even more wealth»

We use that money and build even more wealth.

Most dividend investors roll their distributions back into their investment to accumulate even more wealth over time.

As I describe in Survival +, there is a positive feedback in the process of concentrating wealth and thus political power: the more wealth one acquires, the more political influence one can purchase, which then enables the accumulation of even more wealth as the State / Elite partnership showers benefits and monopolies on those who fund elections, i.e. the wealthy.

Not exact matches

Now even though the Sultan boasts an estimated personal wealth of more than $ 17 billion, and had been receiving haircuts from Mr. Modestou for nearly two decades, the total cost served to shatter the previous world record for the world's most expensive trim.

Truth be told, wealth inequality has traditionally been even more skewed than income inequality in the U.S., and hasn't quite widened quite as much in the last four decades.

Renters could build similar wealth, or even more, if they invested in the stock market the equivalent of a down payment plus any savings from renting instead of owning.

«People will increasingly embrace wealth management solutions like robo - advisors and companies will leverage technology to make the process even easier and more convenient.»

But even more shocking than that admission is the fact that Thursday's tweets are a totally straightforward explanation of how powerful people like Trump can use their wealth to manipulate others and cover up any information they want hidden.

The financial sector wins at the point where you don't see that the prices that the banks are inflating are asset prices — real estate prices, bond and stock prices — and that the role of commercial banks is to increase the power of wealth over the rest of society, over labour, over industry, to create a new ruling - class of bankers that are even more heavy than the landlords that were criticised in the last part of the 19th century.

Debt leveraging is depicted as the easiest and even the surest way to accumulate wealth — going into debt to buy assets whose prices are being inflated on credit, or to spend in the hope of paying out of rising and more easily earned future income.

But closing down unnecessary capacity can pay for itself, even if unemployed workers are temporarily put on the government payroll (causing debt to rise, but usually by less than it had before), but only temporarily as Beijing takes other measures to boost household income through wealth transfers from the state and so to boost consumption, a form of demand which is likely to be more labor intensive than the demand created in the process of over-capacity.

The top1 % are concentrating more wealth comparable with other times in history, increasing prices without correspondng growth in wages at the bottom, have enriched them even further.

No matter how I work the numbers it just seems to me very obvious that unless it sharply speeds up the process of transferring wealth to the household sector so that consumption can grow much more quickly, China simply does not have ten years in which to manage a non-disruptive adjustment unless we are willing to make assumptions so heroic that even El Cid would blanche.

This will boost households» wealth and encourage them to spend more, even before the increase in supply has materialised.

In sophisticated economies, the impact of consumption may be less than in emerging economies that are largely import - export driven, but the consumption magnitude is even more pronounced due to both a greater wealth effect and standard of living that enable individuals to spend more freely with disposable income.

Even though power and wealth have now become more broadly distributed towards human, financial and technological capital, land ownership remains a key index of one's standing in society.

The Resolution foundation report finds that pension wealth is a big driver of wealth inequality, even more than property.

A simple withdrawal sequence might involve withdrawing from taxable accounts first and tax advantaged accounts last, but, according to Daniel Hunt, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Senior Asset Allocation Strategist, even - more complex withdrawal sequencing strategies can have a significantly greater impact on lifetime spending power.

A super-majority practice something known as «stealth wealth», which involves keeping the resources they have amassed a secret from even their own children, leading to a misconception that inherited wealth is more common than it is.

An answer to both question could go like this: It is sometimes fair to tax one group higher than another because we have created an economy where there is an incredible potential for group A to accumulate drastically more amounts of economic wealth than group B, even though the labor of group B is more intrinsically valuable than group A. Given this inefficiency, it is just to redistribute asymmetrically because the initial distribution was flawed.

Client Engagement — delivering proactive, hyper - individualized service for wealth and financial clients to scale advisors to better support even more clients

Completely ignoring the probable future increases in the contribution limits as well as so - called «catch - up» contributions that allow those 50 years or older to deposit even more money each year, by the time they turned 65, they'd be sitting on $ 28,728,583 in tax - free wealth.

However, if you are a single doctor making $ 300,000 per year, did not have to address a meaningful debt burden, and only have $ 100,000 in investments at the age of forty, you have done something very wrong (most likely, you either lived at your means or traded stocks instead of thinking like an owner that made long - term investments) even if you have that same $ 100,000 in paper wealth because you had the skill set and personal opportunity costs to do so much more with your hand in life.

Loving people that aren't like you; forgiving and even allowing others to abuse you; removing the distractions of wealth - these things really do make life more rewarding and free.

Some people start their adult lives with an advantage because of their parents» wealth and maintain that advantage because they are more likely to understand finances, but even controlling for these and all other factors, religion is still a significant factor in economic success.

By neutering the corporate state, the hope is that wealth will be redistributed in a more even way.

Those who have the power and wealth generally want to keep it, even if it is more than they could possibly need.

A summary treatment of the subject, like the chapter on the Song of Songs in Jean Danielou's The Bible and the Liturgy, with its wealth of citations from the early Church, would establish his point even more convincingly.

requires as its first premise great wealth and even greater expectations — conditions that for the American educated middle class came to be ever more taken for granted as the postwar years wore on.

These measures, which were aimed at both protecting the Indian poor from exploitation and creating India's industrial infrastructure, checked economic inequality, even if, as Nehru's critics allege, they distributed poverty more than they shared wealth.

The blessings may not actually be more riches and wealth, but could possibly be poverty, and maybe even death.

At several points he touches upon the paradoxes of modern urbanism and the tragic ironies of our cultural attitude toward cities: although we now have more individual freedom, technical ability, and, arguably, social equity, we do not live in places as hospitable to human beings as were our cities of the past; we are pragmatists who build shoddily; our current obsession with historic preservation is the flip side of our utter lack of confidence in our ability to build well; while cultures with shared ascetic ideals and transcendent orientation built great cities and produced great landscapes, modern culture's expressive ideals, dogmatic public secularism, and privatized religiosity produce for us, even with our vast wealth, only private luxury, a spoiled countryside, and a public realm that is both venal and incoherent; above all, we simultaneously idolize nature and ruin it.

This is even more true once you exclude countries that have the windfall of immense oil wealth.

Man created stories about gods because he did not understand the world around him, even the christians believed that the world was the center of the universe 400 years ago, but as man gained knowledge religions had to rethink their dogma to jive with the facts, in order to hold onto the wealth and power they covet more than anything else, period.

Even though I don't care for Osteen his message seem to be nothing more than a cafeteria selection of positive thinking, Pentecostalism, and the good ole American Health and Wealth Gospel.

Many wives (and husbands) are deserted by their legally - married spouse «often losing health, wealth, fertility and hope, getting stuck with losers and abusers» — the getting stuck part even more so when actually married.

There is such a wealth of information in this book, that even though I set out to write this review three hours ago, I keep getting distracted by the book and have to stop and pour through it some more.

please stop with the financial constraint crap... one of the top 8 wealthiest clubs on planet owned by some fringe member of the walmart clan the richest family in the us charging fans amongst the highest ticket prices in the world... and anyway even clubs below arsenal in the wealth ranking have over the past 10 years won more top trophies than we have.

«In judging our progress as individuals, we tend to concentrate on external factors such as one's social position, influence and popularity, wealth and standard of education... but internal factors may be even more crucial in assessing one's development as a human being: humility, purity, generosity, absence of vanity and readiness to serve our fellow men — qualities within the reach of every human soul.»

It shows that Britain would have been even more unequal had the Conservatives won the 1997 election - hardly a cause for self - congratulation - and maps the Himalayan rise of top pay and wealth.

Even if you ignore the growing evidence that more equal societies perform better, you can not escape from the fact that increasing absolute poverty while leaving vast swathes of unproductive wealth untouched will only make the recovery that much harder.

There have been fears the defeats could detract from the wealth of experience in Parliament but Dr Draman believes there is even more to worry about.

Also, redistributing wealth and democracy is more progressive than redistributing capital, in almost every area of welfare from healthcare, under 18 education, childcare and even social care.

Labour is under attack because we are standing up to the elites who are determined to hijack Brexit to pay even less tax and take even more of the wealth we all create.

A wealth dependent income tax would raise the tax compliance costs even more because it requires regular appraisal of wealth.

They argue even more against wealth taxes, as it means income can be negative if a wealthy person decides to not do any work that year (under a regular income tax, 0 income would be subject to 0 tax).

The idea that more wealth does not necessarily equate with more happiness is nothing new, even to economists.

But our free - market capitalism can not work without growth, so we can not share out either the work or the wealth in a sane way, and we have more than three million without work, beggars on the streets, even a falling expectation of life among the worse - off.

The wealth of as yet unknown new crops and products from the forests are not even mentioned, but then there must be many more medicines, fruits, oils, resins and fibres still to be discovered.

After the Japan earthquake, seismic stations, deep - ocean buoys and tidal gauges delivered a wealth of data for accurate tsunami forecasts in Hawaii, California and the rest of the Pacific Rim, but public preparedness can be even more important