Sentences with phrase «even nuclear attacks»

He somehow believes the population is suffering from chemical wars or even nuclear attacks, and with his experience and vigilance from the over-a-decade time serving in the army, he has been preparing for an event like this by building a hideout that offers more than basic survival kits and fortification from outside attacks.

Created by the Norwegian government and funded by foundation donors, the vault is built to withstand centuries of climate change, natural disasters, and even a nuclear attack.

Not exact matches

When Hawaii's ballistic - missile - threat system blared an alert across the state on January 13, many people didn't know where to go, what to do, or whether they could even survive a nuclear attack.

But the risk of an American attack, however difficult, had to have made them very nervous — even if they were going to go for broke in developing a nuclear capability.

While the attack Thursday was the first of its kind by the US, Lowther said the bomb was «not even close to being a nuclear weapon» and he would «not make the argument that it's a symbol of escalation» in the conflict in Afghanistan.

Building a missile system for the US is a fools errand costing trillions of dollars and even at 90 % success rate millions would die in a nuclear attack.

Even if he doesn't deliver us from a nuclear attack prompted by our unilateral disarmament, our country is no doubt sinful enough to deserve what it gets.

As has been most aptly remarked, Jeremiah's action here «smacks of the same paradox as if a contemporary should forecast nuclear warfare and then proceed to buy a choice piece of real estate on Manhattan»; 2 yet even more — as if he did this with the sirens already warning of the fatal attack!

Based on America's reluctance to use nuclear weapons, and America's desire not to risk American cities, Kim may believe he can attack a neighbor, perhaps even with a nuclear weapon, without fear of a nuclear response from America so long as he maintains the ability to threaten America directly but doesn't actually attack America.

Why should a nuclear Iran be less willing to engage even more vigorously in supporting proxy attacks than it does at present?

After all, even according to Waltz's own theory, Israel would never use its nuclear weapons against Iran even if Hezbollah or any of Iran's other allies repeatedly attacked it.

Any hypothetical military engagement where a nuclear armed country were to be in danger of being completely overrun would change the calculation on whether they would be willing to use nuclear weapons, but Russia probably would not, for example, use their nuclear weapons as a deterrent against attacks against their conventional troops in Ukraine, even if they were in danger of being forced out of Ukraine completely because the retaliation would cost much more to them than what they would be losing.

Opponents also maintain that dropping sanctions against Iran will rejuvenate its economy, allowing it to send even more funds to terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, to reanimate its atomic facilities after a decade passes and to develop the ballistics necessary to launch nuclear attacks on American and Israeli territory — possibly even on New York City.

Defending his Democratic colleague in Congress from a barrage of attacks in his home district, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries said that Rep. Jerry Nadler is still one of the most pro-Israel lawmakers in America — even after he enraged Orthodox Jews by voting for the Iran nuclear deal.

Even if Britain were to come under nuclear attack itself, only 55 % would support using nuclear weapons in response.

Defending his Democratic colleague in Congress from a barrage of attacks in his home district, Hakeem Jeffries said this afternoon that Jerrold Nadler is still one of the most pro-Israel lawmakers in America, even after he enraged Orthodox Jews by voting for the Iran nuclear deal.

News for Nuclear Energy continually updated from thousands of sources on the web: VOX Attacks the Sierra Club for their Anti-Nuclear, Anti «Archaeology has the ability to open unimaginable vistas of thousands, even millions, of years of past human experience.»

Even the logic of deterrence — which the film suggests will be humanity's ruin, since it's the Soviet doomsday machine that will automatically trigger nuclear holocaust if Major Kong accomplishes his mission, and was built in order to deter any such attack — is still with us.

Protection against a severe solar storm, or even a nuclear electromagnetic pulse attack, can be established rather easily and inexpensively.

We never find out why The Federation formed, why they are attacking America, why your former Ghost commander turns evil, why America even has a space - based nuclear missile silo, or what the heck the rest of the world is doing during this conflict.

Events like these rise from natural and technological systems and even from humanity itself; for example, a tsunami half a planet large, a broken nuclear power plant or collapsed oil platform, or a terrorist attack such as the one that happened on 9/11.

Vaughan Pratt: Yes I overlooked the fact that even our own nuclear arsenal could be disabled (or worse, taken over) by cyber attack.

Even with a decade or more of updating homeland protection measures (started under Clinton), while I'm not going to go so far as to say that most cities in the USA are still better prepared against a Soviet - era invasion and nuclear attack than commonplace weather emergencies... but I wouldn't be exaggerating by much to say so.

This means that if a terrorist decides to unleash a nuclear attack where you are intending to travel or are already traveling, your cancellation, your emergency medical treatment, your evacuations, etc. will not be covered by your travel insurance plan — even if it's defined as a terrorist action simply because of the type of incident.

According to another interpretation of proportionality, supported by Judge Higgins in her Dissenting Opinion to the Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion (para 5), which adopts a «means - end proportionality» approach with the focus on restoring state's defensive capacity, it is possible for a nuclear strike to be lawful, even if not commensurate to anticipated Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion (para 5), which adopts a «means - end proportionality» approach with the focus on restoring state's defensive capacity, it is possible for a nuclear strike to be lawful, even if not commensurate to anticipated nuclear strike to be lawful, even if not commensurate to anticipated attack.

Thus, the NPR implicitly confirms the US's longstanding «unwilling or unable» doctrine, allowing to respond with the nuclear strike against a terrorist attack even where there is no «host state» involvement.

And if you really want a next layer, you can even store your Bitcoins in a Xapo's secret Swiss mountain bunker built to withstand cyber and nuclear attack.