Sentences with phrase «even other christian»

@ adam i don't blame you because even other christian denominations don't believe in transubstantiation, certainly there are some catholics who don't.

Having a group committed to a standard of practice or a positive series of actions, perhaps prayer and study and even other Christian disciplines is the best approach.

His primary commitments, however, are to Aquinas, whom he defends not only against modern criticism of the sort made by process thinkers but also against the older criticisms of Medieval Jewish, Muslim and even other Christian thinkers (e.g., Duns Scotus).

We do not celebrate Jewish holidays (except maybe in New York City), nor any of the Indian, Chinese, African, or even other Christian holidays (such as the Eastern Orthodox holidays; there are many more religious holidays on the Christian calendar than Christmas and Easter).

even other Christians who love and revere Jesus but do nt call him God but are going to be «left behind»??? ridiculous

Even if you somehow did find such a one, they would be so out there in right field that even other Christians would call them crazy.

Then again, that's a good reason for my not wrestling, and I'm not saying other people or even other Christians have to agree with me.

There also happens to be an Irish - Catholic on the show, should all Catholics whine about this stereotype and throw a tantrum b / c other Catholics, or even other Christians are not represented?

Not exact matches

If, as many Christians, Jews and even Muslims believe, they are carved on stone by the very finger of God, and no other writings of such character were commited to stone by Him, then it follows that these Commandments are to be permanent and binding, not temporary.

LDS / Mormon is very different than a subset of Christianity (most Christians don't consider it Christianity at all), and therefore since it is not as well known as mainline Christianity (Catholic and Protestant), criticizing particular details (hair - splitting) is still useful on educating others on LDS beliefs — even if done so in a negative way.

The problem I have is that these «churches» using these schools are not paying enough to even cover the cost of the overhead of opening the building for them, and that if any group other than a Christian church tried to use the facilities for religious services, they would more than likely be denied.

Even though my department meetings still don't end in holding hands and singing «Kum Ba Yah,» I am blessed that my days are enveloped in experiencing Jesus at work, with other Christians.

= > I agree because, even though Christianity in China is growing, a greater number of Christians in the industrialized world really express the Holy Spirit in their outward and inward actions towards others.

Even though I grew up in a strong Christian family and studied theology in college, I realize it is as likely a story as many others.

Even when they had the White House (George W) and both Houses of Congress the GOP never even introduced, much less voted on, any bill banning abortion, allowing prayer in school, banning gay marriage or any other of the wedge issues they use to attract a certain mentally deranged segment of the population to their side by pretending to defend those things that are important to Christian conservatiEven when they had the White House (George W) and both Houses of Congress the GOP never even introduced, much less voted on, any bill banning abortion, allowing prayer in school, banning gay marriage or any other of the wedge issues they use to attract a certain mentally deranged segment of the population to their side by pretending to defend those things that are important to Christian conservatieven introduced, much less voted on, any bill banning abortion, allowing prayer in school, banning gay marriage or any other of the wedge issues they use to attract a certain mentally deranged segment of the population to their side by pretending to defend those things that are important to Christian conservatives.

I think you could do your «almighty God» a favour by keeping your legs closed before you're married, giving to the poor, involving yourself with defending other people's rights or even giving to your own struggling Christian organisations.

The Christian Right wants public money to be used for private religious education (vouchers), buildings and services to be used for private religious purposes (this article), and they want subsidies in the form of tax breaks, special exemptions of other sorts, and they even want to destroy Aid to Needy Families so they can drive people into seeking help at their private religious «missions» where you are not allowed to eat unless you are a Christian, and so on.

So one campus is evangelical or pretty much Southern Baptist (not all the students there are Baptist but all conform to Christian social discipline) and the other isn't even remotely Baptist or only vaguely Christian (although most of the students are more than vaguely Christian).

False Christians arn't persecuted True ones are though they even have been persecuted by the Vatican and other false Christians they are under ban in places like NK and Iran and some other places Jesus apostles where persecuted stephen was stoned John the baptist was decapitated Paul was liked in prison for a while you see only true Christians are persecuted how can the richest orinization on the planet claim to follow God and be the richest on the planet and actually persecute everyone else.

Ancient Christian so - called persecution at the hands of Romans is also used today as an excuse to persecute others who don't adhere to their beliefs, even by violent means.

Early Christians in the Roman Empire showed little or no sympathy for other religions, even judiaism..

Many Christians gave away everything they have, even their blood and life, to save others throughout the world for all their history.

Even if you do nt believe Christianity is true, you still need to understand Christian doctrine to speak intelligently about it (now, that all as.sumes you WANT to be able to speak intelligently, and you have some reason for being here other than just to mock without understanding).

I ask this for three reasons: 1) Warfield begins the chapter with Edward Gibbon's conversion to Catholicism, which was related to Gibbon's belief in the continuation of the miraculous; 2) he spends several pages in the same chapter critiquing another famous convert to Catholicism, John Henry Newman, noting what he sees as Newman's shift toward the miraculous; 3) even though he knows that Gregory of Nyssa, Athanasius, and Jerome all wrote about saints in which the miraculous was prominent, he still makes the claim that these «saints» lives» follow other Christian romances and thus represent an infusion of Heathenism into the church.

The problem, mique, is that the Christians (and some other religions) believe that your actions or lack of action (e.g., not properly worshiping their deity) can anger their god and bring his collective punishment upon everyone, so they think it's their civic duty to help you see the light and to legislate their ideas so that all must follow their ways (of course, history shows they can't even agree among themselves what those ways are).

«R.M. Goodswell Christians would have you believe that they were singled out by the Romans... other cultures and peoples faired poorly when encountering the empire... heh... even being roman didn't buy you a pass sometimes in ancient rome... if they felt they needed fresh bodies for the arena, you became fodder.

Even when not engaged in face - to - face argumentation, Jews and Christians spoke about each other in essentially disputational terms.

Christians act like every other group, even though their christ told them to expect trials and tribulations..

More than any other store, including the Christian book store, this one seemed to promote, even unconsciously, the good will toward all people that the angels promised on that first Christmas.

I am very aware of what a chaplain's role is, and — even in our own US armed forces — the role of a Christian chaplain is to do what any other Christian minister would do: give them Jesus.

In other words, No Religion atheists are without question much more criminally inclined than Christians even if self - identified Scarlet - A Atheists are not.

It always amazes me how Christians are bound and determined to have their say and even more determined that others won't be able to say their peace and when something like this happens..

Hearing other Christians tell us that she somehow wasn't good enough and must be, even in death be made Christian makes me want to throw up.

Yeah, they probably don't even believe in other stuff like talking snakes, a young earth, walking on water, virgin birth, and all that other everyday stuff that wacked - out Christians believe...

Nicholls said that for non-Christian it just encourages people to be nice to each other and that even for Christians «it doesn't really have a lot of bite to it normally, it's fairly bland and fairly unchallenging and sometimes, even worse than that, it's actually contradicting what the Christian message is.»

I think the other issue is that a lot of Christian ministers suffer from mental health problems but feel unable to share those with their congregation or even more privately.»

I am neither a christian or muslim but what right do christians have in making fun of muslims and their books when so much trash exists in their houses only difference being that other religions are open about their practices and even accept their mistakes..

And even though I concede some Christians have used this to persecute others, and still do, Christians have been persecuted for professing that «Jesus is Lord».

Bartlo believes Christians have to be intentional about sitting down — distraction free — and carving out time for God on a daily basis, even though it's sometimes easier to just pray «in between» other activities throughout the day or while walking from one thing to the next.

Yes, Naomi is right, the Bible does state that Christians can judge other people, even non-believers.

Even within the world of Christian therapy, some counselors criticize the methods of other religious counselors.

«Even those who claim the Bible's inerrancy make distinctions between Scriptural edicts, sensing that some passages — the Ten Commandments, say, or a belief in Christ's divinity — are central to Christian faith, while others are more culturally specific and may be modified to accommodate modern life.»

I still think Merton's insights are fantastic, even if I did not enjoy his persistent religious attachments to Mary and other Christian elements.

it reminds me the way Michael Frost (and many others in other words, like NT Wright, Bonhoeffer, and even Ellul) explain the kingdom of God as being some kind of a «trailer» for the Kingdom that is coming, and christians would be already living the the Kingdom reality right here in this world, where it seems to the eye that there is no kingdom of God at all.

I personally think religion should not be a factor.No one should ask the candidates what their religious views are and they should never mention them.Their religious preferences have absolutely no effect on what type of leader they will be.Unless they are some kind of a religious fanatic.I think it's time for an atheist.There was not a Christian president for over the first 50 years of our nations existence.And, I do not think there has been one since.If you look it up you will find not one of our founding fathers were Christian.Not even Jefferson.I know he wrote the Jefferson bible, but, that's just because he, like the other founding fathers, did not believe Jesus to be of divine decent.So, he kept his philosophy while removing all the mystical and dogmatic concepts.

There are precendents in other countries — even ones that are predominantly Christian.

In that forum even some Christians had to admit the folly that a so called «god» was in control since they didn't wish to admit that this god killed those heros (or just looked the other way why they were killed).

They acknowledge the God of Israel, even though they do not know his name, just as truly as other Christians deny him when, according to the Q tradition, they perform wonders in the name of Jesus while practicing lawlessness.

Even though we modern, civilized Christians typically do not kill and murder those with whom we disagree, there is an area of our lives today where we still put others to death for the sake of our religion.

It is understandable why the New York Times's Editorial Board would conclude that Christians view sinners as inferior — the tragic history of Christianity, even within our own country, offers many examples of Christians who have used sin as an excuse to dehumanize, discriminate, and hate others.