Not exact matches
«This also allows for searches for transmitters that are many orders of magnitude less powerful than those that would be detectable from a
planet orbiting even the most nearby
stars.»
«It might
even have consequences for life on
planets orbiting binary
stars.»
Among the 1,900 - and - counting confirmed alien
planets found so far, we've seen everything from bizarro, jumbo versions of Jupiter in scorchingly tight
orbits to exoplanets dozens of times farther out than Neptune, and
even worlds circling two
stars, like Tatooine in
Star Wars.
Many
planets outside the solar system are
even more massive than Jupiter, and they
orbit their Sun - like
stars at an Earth - like distance, but these faraway super-Jupiters are effectively giant gas balls that can not support life because they lack solid surfaces.
They
even found an example of binary
planets where two
planets orbit each other in the absence of a parent
star.
That parts - per - million sensitivity should allow Corot to detect the dips in a
star's light caused by a transiting
planet with a radius just twice that of Earth — and perhaps an
even smaller one, provided its
orbit is tighter than Mercury's, so that the
planet completes three transits during the 150 - day viewing period.
Even if many other
stars have solar systems too,
planets that happen to
orbit in just the right place to support life could be pretty rare.
Those stellar explosions can have lethal effects on
planets orbiting stars even tens of light - years away.
The much - anticipated James Webb Space Telescope — often referred to as Hubble's successor — for example, will likely only study worlds that hug their host
stars, making observations of
planets with wider
orbits like Mars or
even Earth out of the question.
By measuring those rising and falling «light curves,» Kepler will give astronomers valuable information about
planets orbiting other
stars — including exoplanets in far - out
orbits that other techniques can't detect — and
even free - floating
planets that don't
orbit stars at all.
This is because their intense magnetic activity interferes with the light emitted by the
star to a far greater extent than a potential giant
planet,
even in a close
orbit.
And if any
planets similar to these
orbit in their parents
stars» habitable zone, substantially farther from the home
star where liquid water might more likely exist, their atmospheres will lose
even smaller amounts of hydrogen - bearing compounds over time, the researchers note.
Even though many of the
planets orbit their
stars very closely and have high temperatures, which in turn causes their hydrogen - rich atmospheres to expand and a fraction of the gases to escape the
planet over time, it's unlikely that the
planets will lose enough of their atmosphere to become rocky bodies like Earth, the researchers report online today in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Over a simulated interval of 200 million years, the inner
planet slowly migrated
even farther inward to become a «warm Jupiter»
orbiting its parent
star at about the same distance Mercury does in our solar system, the researchers report online today in Science.
And
even then, the
planet would have to
orbit a special kind of
star, a white dwarf, for the CFCs to show up.
If they were nearly the same, this would suggest that the cause was something opaque, like an
orbiting disk,
planet, or
star, or
even large structures in space» said Wright, who is a co-author of the paper, titled «The First Post-Kepler Brightness Dips of KIC 8462852.»
According to Weaver, the size of our sun, the region of the galaxy in which it formed,
even how long it took for the
planets to form — all these characteristics are different in other
star systems and may influence the chemical inventory available to any Earth - like
planets orbiting there.
From
even just a few light - years away in our own little corner of the Milky Way, a
planet in an
orbit comparable to Earth's would be too close to its
star for
even the Hubble to see them as two distinct objects.
If this happens, the
star could deflect some of the comets sunward, so that they might cross Earth's
orbit or
even hit the
planet itself.
Likewise,
even if a
planet orbits within the so - called Goldilocks zone surrounding its parent
star where conditions are neither too hot nor too cold, its atmosphere may be hostile to life, a new study suggests.
Measuring the dimming of starlight as a
planet crosses the face of its
star during
orbit, scientists can collect a wealth of information,
even without ever seeing those worlds directly.
The failure, thus far, to find large substellar objects like brown dwarfs or a Jupiter - or Saturn - class
planet in a «torch»
orbit (closer han the Mercury to Sun distance) around 107 Piscium — with
even the highly sensitive radial - velocity technique of Geoffrey W. Marcy and R. Paul Butler — bodes well for the possibility of Earth - type terrestrial
planets around this
star (Cumming et al, 1999).
While TESS looks for
planets orbiting dwarf
stars from space, the SPECULOOS survey will be looking at
even smaller and dimmer
stars from the ground.
Some of these
planets orbiting low - mass
stars could experience very slow water loss that could last up to the lifetime of the
star, which could allow habitable conditions to persist
even during a moist or runaway greenhouse.
Kiang found that «plants» on Earth - like
planets orbiting stars somewhat brighter and bluer than the Sun might look yellow or orange, and
even look bluish by reflecting a dangerous overabundance of more energetic blue light.
Earth - size may not mean habitable The team, which also included
planet hunter Geoffrey Marcy, UC Berkeley professor of astronomy, cautioned that Earth - size
planets in Earth - size
orbits are not necessarily hospitable to life,
even if they
orbit in the habitable zone of a
star where the temperature is not too hot and not too cold.
But
planets orbiting dimmer, cooler red dwarf
stars might be at the right temperature for life
even if they are so close.
In 1996, astronomers announced the discovery of a Jupiter - like
planet around this Sun - like
star (Butler and Marcy, 1996 — details below), and there were indications of an
even larger
planet in an outer
orbit.
Enough observations would allow an
orbit to be calculated, but
even two observations should make a
planet more likely than a distant
star if (relative) motion is detected.
«Tau Ceti has been a popular destination for science fiction writers and everyone's imagination as somewhere there could possibly be life, but
even though life around Tau Ceti may be unlikely, it should not be seen as a letdown, but should invigorate our minds to consider what exotic
planets likely
orbit the
star, and the new and unusual
planets that may exist in this vast universe,» says Pagano.
TrES - 5
orbits one of the faintest
stars with transiting
planets found to date from the ground and demonstrates that precise photometry and followup spectroscopy are possible, albeit challenging,
even for such faint
stars.
In 1996, astronomers announced the discovery of a Jupiter - like
planet around this Sun - like
star (Marcy and Butler, 1996 — details below), with indications of an
even larger
planet in an outer
orbit.
Although
planet b
orbits Tau Boötis A quite closely, this
star is
even hotter than Sol (as an F spectral type).
It was believed that the formation of two or more
stars would hardly leave enough mass remaining to cohere into
planets, and that
even if those
planets were created, the gravitational pull of a close second
star would expel them from their
orbits — either by shoving them out of the system or pulling them to fall into one of the
stars.
Even if such an
orbit were possible, any Earth - type
planets that
orbited Edasich during its youth would by now have been burnt to a cinder, and possibly fallen into the
star from frictional drag with the giant
star's gaseous envelope.
GJ 1214 is a red dwarf
star with one known
planet in a hot inner
orbit, beyond
even the inner edge of the
star's close - in habitable zone, as imagined by Aguilar with two hypothetical moons (more).
Scientists have discovered a
planet a lot like Jupiter
orbiting a dim
star, if you can
even call it a
star — it's nothing like our sun.
Now, researchers have begun to take an
even closer look and investigate the possibility of
planets orbiting the individual
stars of multiple -
star systems.
The failure, thus far, to find large substellar objects like brown dwarfs or a Jupiter - or Saturn - class
planet in a «torch»
orbit (closer than the Mercury to Sun distance) around Xi Boötis A — with
even the highly sensitive radial - velocity methods of Geoffrey W. Marcy and R. Paul Butler — bodes well for the possibility of Earth - type terrestrial
planets around this
star (Cumming et al, 1999).
The smallest
planet orbits Kepler - 33, a
star older and more massive than our Sun, Sol, which also had the most detected
planet candidates at five (ranging in size from 1.5 to 5 times that of Earth) in uninhabitable, hot inner
orbits closer to their
star than
even Mercury around our Sun (NASA Kepler news release; and JPL news release).
Studies conducted by our group have also shown that exoplanets
orbiting really close to their host
star have very dynamic atmospheres, meaning that they change continuously, producing clouds of different sizes,
even whole cloud systems, all over the
planet's surface.
Some of the research covered in the documentary includes scientists who are identifying and characterizing
planets orbiting other
stars (the other
planets in our solar system would likely be more trouble than they're worth to make comfortable, the film argues); an engineer building a rocket fueled by plasma, the same charged particles found in our sun; and a team building a fleet of robots that could construct habitats before humans
even arrive at their destination.
Even if such an
orbit were possible, any Earth - type
planets that
orbited Aldebaran A during its youth would have been burnt to a cinder by now, and possibly fallen into the
star from frictional drag with the giant
star's gaseous envelope.
Now, remember that we postulated a very eccentric
orbit, this means that the tidal effect will vary greatly and be much larger when the
planet is closest to the
star, hence if tides can interfere with or perhaps
even control generation of
star spots, then the generation of the activity would be synchronized with the orbital period of the
star.