Sentences with phrase «even pseudoscience»

For the most part, I don't think a lot of people (or at least those that matter) take people like «kim» seriously, yet even pseudoscience gives the illusion of debate (Monckton's latest artwork on climate sensitivity being an example)

Not exact matches

Even the science of vitamins was a fledgling endeavor characterized by a great deal of pseudoscience.
Nonsense on Stilts by Massimo Pigliucci (University of Chicago Press) A tour of solid science, shaky science, and pseudoscience, this crash course in critical thinking by biologist and philosopher Pigliucci includes handy rules for evaluating the confused public discourse on climate change, evolution, and even UFOs.
Some people, and even media outlets, have gone on to equate the pseudoscience - y food, fitness, and medical advice from Brady's The TB12 Method with that of Paltrow's controversial wellness site, Goop.
This topic is a controversial one surrounded by years of nutritional pseudoscience (even some made by veterinarians) and marketing ploys.
Her form of expression also draws from the 19th century panorama and cyclorama repertoire, Goya's engravings, the pseudoscience of physiognomy, minstrel shows, or even the romance novel.
Besides the isolationist stand of the Party (I quit in 1990 when they came out against Desert Storm), they don't recognize that externalities even exist — and that takes them firmly into the realm of pseudoscience.
Amazing that you are so committed to your false pseudoscience climate cult religion that you can't even cite a single peer reviewed paper that empirically supports it that you are willing to discredit and make a total fool of yourself.
Not even the alarmist peddlers of the CO2 pseudoscience claims that climate warming prior to ~ 1950 was primarily due to humans.
Really, this statement is so absurdly wrong that it doesn't even qualify as pseudoscience, but as science fiction.
Or you might look at misbehavior which is all too common in ordinary pseudoscience disputes, but which in the physical and biological sciences is very uncommon on the funded academic side: e.g., triumphalism about unfalsifiable claims, and circling the wagons around various kinds of data hiding (e.g., remarkably lackadaisical formal investigation of CRU even after FOIA violations, and broad enthusiasm for promoting the formal results into an informal full «nothing to see here, move along» exoneration).
No one's scientific credibility has been destroyed here, scientific credibility gets destroyed when you post shoddy research which isn't even peer - reviewed, lie to congress and the public, and embrace crackpot pseudoscience instead of real science.
Can such an idea be tested when it is being treated as a pseudoscience and thus above testing, when it is considered herisy to even subject it to test?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z