Sentences with phrase «even read what»

like now — writing this comment — i can't even read what i am writing because of the car ad at the bottom which is covering up my comment.

NAILED it!!!! Before I even read what you said about wanting it to look like a department store display, that's what I thought!!!

``... if there is a la nina phase where the cool ocean cools the atmosphere by transferring heat...» — Do you even read what you are writing Mark?

So a lot of the fuss and bother in posts above seems to be some posters can't even read what is written by others and understand the simple English meaning of what they are reading.

lolwot, do you even read what people say?

Do you even read what you post?

He couldn't even read what her papers said.

I daren't even read what the package offers because I know it will infuriate me.

Do you even read what you write?

Before I even read what you wrote, I was thinking how smart it was to make spring pants a staple for fall by adding a darker color — great minds

Turns out, activist groups like ours have trained people to send advocacy messages without a second thought (I doubt many of them even read what they're signing).

i don't even read what he writes anymore, I just thumb him down coz I know he always writes same dumb n irrelevant sh*t.

Did you even read what he said?

Do you even read what you.write!!!

You didn't even read what I had to say did you?

Umm Chuckles, did you even read what I wrote?

Did you even read what you say?

When I saw the citizens of humanity ones on you, without even reading what you said, I knew those were the perfect pair.

I found myself asking questions via forums and even reading what others have discovered on their adventures which helped to lengthen the mystery and awe I found while playing.

Are you even reading what people write?

No need to spend any valuable time even reading what he says.

So, for some reason, we need to be respectful of Cook et al, but we can call Professor Hulme an idiot, without even reading what it is he has agreed with.

Not exact matches

There's an assumption when reading a newspaper that the editors in charge are interested in informing people about what's happening in the world, even if that information is disturbing or offensive to some.

Annotate, model, think, and synthesize while you read, even when you're reading what you conceive to be introductory stuff,» he writes.

What Bengen discovered was that the 6 percent withdrawal rate he had read about failed around 20 percent of the time, but 4.5 percent survived for every one of those periods — even those starting just before the onset of the Great Depression.

From what I have read, this is not a good defense, even for a science fiction movie.

You can even try doing a little online research to get a handle on what the central argument of a title might be before reading it to boost your comprehension and recall.

You know what they're thinking and feeling, even if you're reading it on a screen.

And in the course of working with numerous consultants, business owners, startups and even Fortune 500s, I've come to realize something startling: Most of us know what good copy looks like, and what it reads like, but when we put something down, we don't know how to follow the rules.

«It's called «extreme reading,»» and it «challenges students to read no matter where they are or what else they're doing: jumping on a trampoline, skydiving, playing soccer, riding a horse, sledding, or even swimming underwater.»

Regulators read the press reports of directors serving 40 years, auditors even serving up to 100, and communicate with academics on what the empirical research findings are.

It all suggests that the dramatic day and a half of legal proceedings are but a prelude to even more courtroom theatrics and combat in what has become a sordid, long - standing matter (for the full saga, read the Disturbing Decline of Sumner Redstone) that reflects poorly on countless participants, not least the boards of CBS and Viacom, which took no action to remove Redstone as their executive chairman until Herzer's case forced their hand.

If you haven't read Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty - First Century, if you haven't read The Zero Marginal Cost Society [Jeremy Rifkin's account of how extreme gains in productivity are disrupting capitalism by rendering many goods and services almost free], you can not even have a conversation with me about what the future is holding.

From novel scheduling systems, to exhortations to invest in health, and even spiritual reminders that «work - life balance» is really a modern spin on the ancient and fundamentally difficult question of what constitutes a life well lived, you can spend hours upon hours neither working nor living but simply reading through posts and columns on the topic.

What «may not be as good,» however, is merely «reading articles or watching videos,» even if they're informative or entertaining.

Even if your company has a strong mission, a learning culture with smart people to learn from and lots of growth opportunities, it's very difficult to know what it's like to work there by reading your job listing and looking at your marketing website.

Someone using a screen reading program could know exactly who and what's in an image, their location, maybe even their expressions.

I know that most people will tell you that they aren't influenced by what they read on TechCrunch but the reality is that people are way more influenced by what they read in the press than they even admit to themselves.

To get into a few specifics, pre-ticked boxes — which is essentially what Facebook is deploying here, with a big blue «accept and continue» button designed to grab your attention as it's juxtaposed against an anemic «manage data settings» option (which if you even manage to see it and read it sounds like a lot of tedious hard work)-- aren't going to constitute valid consent under GDPR.

So if you're reading this right now, I think you're going to be even happier with what you see from almost every corner of the International Living world in the days and weeks to come.

Such encryption would mean that only the parties in a conversation could see what was being said, with even Yahoo unable to read it.

You know exactly what your getting before you even read the body of the article.

Read this eBook to learn more about what to look for in a potential location, choosing a neighborhood, and even see two example properties from JWB.

You'll respond with the usual canned fundamentalist idiocy that I've read and heard a thousand times already, so I'll not even bother to respond to what you might have to say.

It's not that I don't feel like I can, I can... but is that in the vocabulary of the one who I worship, if it's not then why would I as His Son want to take on what is not His, my Father's nature... The versions of the Bible I've read seem to think that words are powerful and speaking them is an action and can even change physics if used properly... Again, the scriptures speak for themselves and circumventing the topical study with christiany cliche come - backs doesn't answer or annul anything that the Word has to say on the matter.

You distill what a guy like William Voegeli shows you, or what you learn from say, NRO's Bench Memos after reading it for years, and the news about America and especially about the ineffectiveness of conservatism even in victory, is deeply disturbing.

Meanwhile, to Hawking's supporters who suggest that I am not owning up to his scientific «proofs,» I believe airwx has already said it best for me — he's a THEORETICAL physicist, and having read some of his work, I'm smart enough to know that much of what he says about God is an exercise in jumping to conclusions, even as sound as much of his scientific work is.

even my kids read them every day wondering what new ones came in.

Even so, what is needed for a present - day reading of Kierkegaard is something more important than the crutches professors typically offer to the reader of the works of a genius: an historical introduction that would focus not so much on the circumstances of the inception, but rather on the conditions of the appropriation, of his works.

What I meant is that he has actually studied the material, where most Christians haven't even read it once.