Sentences with phrase «even relativity»

Even relativity and evolution still have unresolved caveats, and no string theory paper would ever have seen print.

This is the place where all known laws of physics, even relativity and quantum mechanics, break down.

There can be only one as even relativity and quantum gravitational phase find themselves in conflict.

Not exact matches

That includes things that fly from other planets, which touches on one of Relativity's even more ambitious goals.

Even with several testing milestones outstanding, a $ 100 million valuation makes Relativity fairly cheap in today's market.

Someone who thinks relativity and string theory are childish compared to his knowledge of what he designed thinks that you are worth dying for, and that he is so powerful that even death can not hold him, he can bring himself back to life, just to save you.

Some new additions to the theory of evolution could (like it has done before) very well make it better, or perhaps a new theory could turn up that explains things even better like it happened to Newtons theories on gravity with Einsteins theories of relativity, but rocketengineers often still use Newtons laws because they are good enough for many, many apllications.

Even before Albert's great mind revealed to us his theory of relativity, God revealed his characteristics.

And the phrase would still not express truly the distance between the Kingdom of God and all other values, even if the relativity of these other values to this highest value is emphasized.

A closely related question is the even more hotly - disputed one of the so - called «relativity of values».

Quantum mechanics is in the same situation as relativity, and perhaps even a worse one.

In conclusion, even though Hartshorne himself questions divine relativity in the case of inferior emotions and ignorance, we have seen that, for any particular experience, the assertion that the relative nature of God knows that experience by feeling it in exactitude is unwarranted.

Cartesian order has been maintained even in relativity, in its mathematics.

I find it quite surprising not to have found in the literature even a tangential analysis of this metaphysical problem with Hartshorne's philosophy of religion, especially because it relates to the very possibility or impossibility of divine relativity.

In spite of the fact that Hartshorne universally posits a strong sense of relativity to account for omniscience (as well as for other reasons), I will argue that even Hartshorne is forced in important specific cases to attenuate his claims for a strong interpretation of divine relativity; one that says God feels in exactitude the experience of others.

It is significant, though, that even later, in his own Principle of Relativity, Whitehead still retains a «uniform» geometry (of which Euclidian geometry is a subspecies) in sharp distinction to the nonuniform, «warped» geometry of Einstein's general rRelativity, Whitehead still retains a «uniform» geometry (of which Euclidian geometry is a subspecies) in sharp distinction to the nonuniform, «warped» geometry of Einstein's general relativityrelativity.

For example, the Bible says that time was created by God when He created the universe.19 Stephen Hawking, George Ellis, and Roger Penrose extended the equations for general relativity to include space and time, demonstrating that time began at the formation of the universe.20 Of course, the biggest coup of the Bible was to declare that the universe had a beginning21 through an expanding universe model.22 The New Testament even declares that the visible creation was made from what was not visible and that dimensions of length, width and height were created by God.23 In addition, the Bible refuted steady - state theory (saying that the creation of matter and energy has ended) 24 long before science made that determination.

My efforts here, then, have a limited but basic objective: to argue that the doctrine of relativity implies the repeatability of all entities, including actual entities, and to begin to exhibit the extent to which Whitehead's philosophy of organism is built on the tenet that even particulars are repeatable.

Even if God is thought of as having slightly less than perfect knowledge, the idea of God being able to fully appreciate ignorance seems categorically impossible.6 There are further problems for the theory of divine relativity.

But even in the more conventional worlds of quantum mechanics and relativity, let alone cosmology and string theory, what we think of as «the simple logic of cause and effect» goes pretty much right out the window.

You don't sound like a Scientist, Scientists do not use words like «prove» or «fact» even when discussing Newton's Law of Gravity or Einstein's Law of Relativity.

So then, QM and Relativity require a sentient being outside the universe to make the universe real; even though the NAZI and their like minded followers of today dispute Einstein's finding.

It took someone else to show him that he was wrong... He even accounted for a constant - sized universe in his theory of relativity...

Even within physics there is not much interest in developing a coherent quantum theory or integrating relativity theory with it.

It is just here, as I think, that the broad philosophical implications of the theory of Relativity come to our aid, and would still be forced upon us as metaphysicians, even if there were not well - known specific difficulties in the details of physical science, which seem to be most readily disposed of by the theory.

There will usually be enough overlap between the assumptions of the two parties that a common core of observations - statements can be accepted by both — even, I would argue, in a change as far - reaching as that from classical physics to relativity.

Even if we don't remember — or never learned — what Einstein meant by general or specific relativity, we need to understand that theoretical physics has drastically changed our understanding of reality.

Moreover, as we learned from our earlier discussion, he can occasionally speak even of a purely formal concept like «relativity» as being in a broad sense analogical, because it has systematically different senses as explicative of the meaning of different logical types.

In fact, in a parallel passage, Hartshorne even speaks of psychical terms as merely «almost categorial» because of this difference in their scope of application from «the strictly categorial notions» like «relativity» (1970a, 154).

But I would remind you that Durrell came to write the fantastically structured Alexandria Quartet, in which, even though the selves in it do not escape from the relativity of their own selfhood, nonetheless memory, and thus the past, plays a central and creative role.

In a senior class in atomic theory they may enter seldom, though even in this field relativity and quantum mechanics did involve precisely such examination of basic assumptions.

suasion,» whose «power is the worship he inspires» (Whitehead), that is, flows from the intrinsic appeal of his infinitely sensitive and tolerant relativity, by which all things are kept moving in orderly togetherness, we may find help in facing our task of today, the task of contributing to the democratic self - ordering of a world whose members not even the supreme orderer reduces to mere subjects with the sole function of obedience.59

Black Holes are also constantly debated and hardly understood, it is a constant battle between the General Theory of Relativity & Quantum Physics / Mechanics regarding them, especially the destruction of the data encrypted in the «Wave Function» beyond the «Event Horizon» where even light can not escape.

More recently, Einstein's theory of relativity, Max Planck's discovery of the quantum, and other developments in contemporary physics have gathered together widely diverse natural occurrences into tighter unity and surprising coherence that leads to even further discovery.

Chastened by our new awareness of the historicity, relativity, and linguistic constraints that shape all modes of human experience and consciousness, we may nonetheless attempt here to demonstrate that there already exists, even in the consciousness of skeptics and critics of revelation, a natural and ineradicable experience of the fact that reality at its core has the character of consistency and «fidelity» that emerges explicitly in the self - revelation of a promising God.

Oddly enough, in The Principle of Relativity, where one expects a rigorous treatment of such topics, one does not find Whitehead's own definition of simultaneity or even an argument against Einstein's.

Relativity (unfortunately for you) has been proven to be true, (even tough you have no clue what that even means).

So they must ultimately imply an absolute outside their order, even as the most delicate and wonderful relativities made by man, the new electronic calculators and reactors, are not explicable except in terms of an absolute not contained in the inter-relativity of their integral parts.

Even within eternal being itself there is a principle of relativity, which is its power of existing and of being known, so that motion and life and soul and mind can be present with it.

Frankly, I find more serious discussion of the problems of moral relativity and political ideology in the sociological writings of Karl Mannheim and Max Scheler, and even in the structuralism of Claude Levi - Strauss, than I do in the writings of many contemporary theologians.

The unchanging God enters the time - process, its relativity, and even its alienation from God.

The question is, given the relativity of our thinking, what confidence, if any, can we place in any of our ideas, even our ideas of relativity?

But sheer relativity in science, if taken seriously, will have results even more disastrous than religious relativity.

Even if we disregard the difficulty of stating this view in a self - consistent language, its incompatibility with relativity theory is obvious.

Only the succession of causally unrelated event, what Hans Reichenbach called «unreal sequences» (PST 147 - 49) can by an appropriate choice of the frame of reference be reduced to apparent simultaneity or even inverted; but the real concrete causal links — the «world - lines,» in the language of relativity — are objectively irreversible since the order of succession of the events of which they consist remains the same in every frame of reference.

Initially he thought that — he was simply explicating what Whitehead should have said or perhaps even wanted to say (The Divine Relativity: A Social Conception of God [New Haven, CN: Yale University Press -LCB- 1948; 1974 -RCB--RSB-, 30 - 31; Charles Hartshorne and William Reese, Philosophers Speak of God [Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1953; 1965], 274; henceforth cited as PSG).

Loop quantum gravity, Rovelli's own specialism, is an attempt to take reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics even if this means a theory where there is no fundamental time.

Even general relativity is limited — in ways quantum mechanics is not — for describing systems at the atomic scale or smaller, at very low or very high energies, or at the lowest temperatures.

The problem is that the rules of general relativity mandate physical continuity everywhere in the universe, even around a black hole.

Even in Einstein's theory of relativity, where distances and timescales can change depending on an observer's reference frame, an object's location in space - time is precisely defined.