Sentences with phrase «even see a question»

I do not even see a question on any of your comments above.

Many schools don't even see this question as an «either / or» dilemma, purchasing devices to be used differently to access different parts of the curriculum.

I hope I'm not the only one who finds little to respect in masters of the universe who can't even see a question mark as a question mark.

Not exact matches

But the leader who asks this question of employees sees something even greater: the patterns of strengths, the early warning signs of deficiencies, and the opportunities and possibilities yet to be seized across the organization.

David Littell, retirement income program director at The American College, said he expected to see gaps in the financial knowledge of the survey respondents, but even so, the results to the 38 questions were dismaying.

But anyone I've seen who pushes back or questions the policy is told some variation of «someone checked with a lawyer when they came up with this, so don't even worry about it.»

And Lanier saw an opportunity to go even further with Tonic: having it figure out on the fly which questions were relevant on the basis of the answers to previous questions, and then immediately flag potential health problems.

We brought in CNBC markets reporter Dominic Chu for an «interview» to see if he was up for the job — and ready to answer even the wackiest question.

But what I liked best about the book is how it engages with what I see as one of the most important and difficult social - policy questions of our time: How do we unstack the deck and, at the same time, get people to take ownership over improving their own lives and communities even when they reasonably believe that the deck is stacked against them?

Many employees see stock option plans as complex, and may not even know what questions to ask.

There's no question that investors have come to believe that somehow quantitative easing has durably changed the world — that central banks have (or even can) put a floor under the markets as far as the eye can see.

What is interesting to see with this bitcoin hype is how uneducated writers still are when it comes to the question of what money actually is — especially the assumption that money, e.g. US Dollars, are tied to any real world values like gold is one of these modern fairytales that is repeated often — I can not understand that even after the big corporate crimes (aka as «financial crisis») that US Citizens cost millions of dollars there is still such a lack of understanding of what money actually is.

My question is am I starting too small and should see if i can get a larger apt complex or even a mobile home park since most of what I have will be locked up in it.

A point I meant to make, but forgot to, is that Quebec can afford to reduce tuition if it wishes to, even if one sets aside MMT, and looks at the question from a purely provincial standpoint, taking a traditional left - Keynesian perspective, such as that of Harold Chorney — see his recent blog post: http://haroldchorneyeconomist.com/2012/04/14/vive-le-quebec-social-et-progressif-the-conflict-over-higher-university-tuition-fees-in-quebec/

It's an open question whether we'll see that level of prospective return in the next market cycle, but even if we touch that level of prospective returns 5 or 6 years from now, stocks will have gone nowhere in the interim (including dividends).

The Conservatives would argue that this was a question about government business — you see, even when rules are applied, there are ways of getting around them for your partisan purposes.

This post, as an example, is a result of identifying the question our marketing persona has, «We're creating all this content and we saw an initial bump in results when we started, but things have plateaued (or are even declining).

But even with this restriction, there should be considerable opportunity to argue that international law might inform such matters as: the content of the duty to consult, the significance of the right to culture, the respect that should be accorded to indigenous conceptions of property, and the question of what might constitute an unjustifiable infringement of an aboriginal right or title or a treaty right: see my post on the Supreme Court's Grassy Narrows decision here.

You seem to believe that you are aware of what everyone is thinking, as this is the second time you have made a sweeping blanket statement... but to answer your question: I can assure you if that woman did see an angel telling her to kill her children, it certainly would have been a fallen angel, or demon if you prefer and not from God... If you had even a basic understanding of angels and fallen angels and the protection of God, this would be a moot point... but it appears that you want to play the game of how ridiculous can I be...

He had many visitors and I was so curious that I interviewed all of them and I asked them questions that were very bold, I even asked to see body parts and some complied, there was no question off limits and all of the men complied with the interviews I conducted.

If examining rational arguments, perceiving God in transcendent experience, and delving deeply into difficult questions are what drew me closer to Christ, seeing Christ work in the lives of actual Christians is what opened my heart to Him in the first place, allowing me to see how He had been working in my own life all along, even when I had refused to seek Him.

Jesus» disciples constantly questioned his actions, and Peter denied Christ even after seeing him walk on water!

I see you didn't even attempt to address the questions...

-- In their everyday lives people see that atheism does not explain the fundamental questions and a godless world doesn't make us happier or even more questioning.

Facebook page, and even after these people read my dream on my FB page which includes the Scriptures that explained my dream to me, they mocked me, called me names, questioned my mental health and said I saw something demonic (as if Satan would tell me, «Repent NOW.

It's really pathetic to see so many Christians that are so LACKING HONESTY and INTEGRITY that they would refuse to answer simple yes - or - no questions or even care enough about TRUTH to admit their own quotes were made.

I DO see the proble in questioning the power of god... the problem is, it is very unlikey there is a god, and even less likely it is YOUR god.

In conclusion, even though Hartshorne himself questions divine relativity in the case of inferior emotions and ignorance, we have seen that, for any particular experience, the assertion that the relative nature of God knows that experience by feeling it in exactitude is unwarranted.

Even though we may revisit the different kinds of questions at different times in our lives, I see these stages as delineating different passages of my spiritual journey.

It is an affirmation and not, as many conservative evangelicals have reflexively assumed, a questioning of biblical authority when the language of liberation and empowerment prove fruitful in understanding further dimensions of what salvation always meant according to the scriptural witness, even though we had not previously been pushed to see it that clearly.

Even as conservative a Catholic moral theologian as Thomas J. O'Donnell admits that AIH was an open question in theory and in practice before 1949 (see Medicine and Christian Morality [Alba House, 1976], p. 266).

See, now that question doesn't even make sense.

Most who encounter the Summa Theologiae see a maze of questions, articles, objections, responses, and replies; hence the temptation to turn Aquinas into a textbook on philosophy, theology, morals, and even science.

«58 With the publication of Jewett's book the question of «error» is seen to be a pertinent topic for discussion concerning Biblical authority, even among those holding to a position of «complete infallibility.»

And I take it as established that Hausman has shown a means whereby we can understand Bergson's approach as both metaphorical and rational2 As I am certain the reader does, I have questions I would like answered in light of their important insights and these interpretations of Bergson, but the issue I will examine presently is how Gunter's thesis and Hausman's elaboration might affect our understanding of Bergson's influence on Whitehead.3 The view of Bergson Gunter seeks to supplant is very widely held, and indeed was held, (if not really defended) until recently even by Professor Hausman (see the «Dialogue» below).

Even when the subject matter is ostensibly the same, we see quite different questions animating these studies.

Socrates... you mean that only the church gets to pose whacked out unproveable nonsense (can't even call them theories) as definite answers to metaphysical questions.,,, I see.

For it will be seen, particularly in the first section, that even the Church's official permissive toleration of a moderate theory of evolution still leaves many questions unanswered, and in fact raises new problems.

Answering a question from an @CNNBelief Twitter follower, Osteen said Lakewood Church celebrates communion once a month, even though TV viewers don't see it.

(i) the question of gay rights — funny I agree with gay rights, must be a political debate at its heart (ii) a wonan's right to choose — funny I agree with this, see above thought (iii) teaching evolution in school — again I agree (iv) my ability to buy a glass of wine on Sunday — definitely politics here (v) immunizing teens against HPV — got my kids immunized, not even politics here (vi) population control — this is religions fault??? no this is cultural (vii) assisted suicide at end of life — agree with that, still have my religion (viii) global warmning — agree it needs to get fixed, doesn't have anything to do with religion

I think that will be very clear to everyone that the predominant religions of today is ancient beliefs that might have been reasonable at the time when they were written, but that was more than 1,600 years ago and we have learnt a lot since, even though I sometimes question that when I see what is going on in the world.

Thus, as most FWTs see it, the relevant question is which of the following pictures of God is most appealing: (1) a God who creates individuals who only think they are free but are actually controlled by God and thus produce no evil or (2) a God who bestows actual freedom on individuals even though such freedom may produce (has produced) much evil along with much good.

Of course, this is not all that Christians believe, or even the major part of what Christians believe, about Jesus Christ; but for our purpose, it is enough now just to admit at least that much, to see here life given in love to the point of complete surrender of self, to agree that the ages witness that this is healthy life, this is wholeness, and then to turn to oneself and ask the very simple but very searching question, «How do I measure up to that standard?»

Ironically, the very fact the bishops are making these «bold» statements is a testament to Israel's essential decency and humanity» the bishops know there will be no serious consequences or massive reprisals against Christians in Israel for «speaking out,» whereas any similar Christian criticism» or even questioning» of an Arab government in the region, or Islamic extremism, would» well, we all saw what happened after Regensburg.

They feed us with stuff about world hunger and Third World questions which even an economic ignoramus like myself can see is amateur and outdated....

Instead, the historian's task was seen to consist in understanding those deep - lying intentions of the past, by involving one's selfhood in an encounter in which one's own intentions and views of existence are put in question, and perhaps altered or even radically reversed.

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

it will make you wonder if there is a spirit beyond our bodies,,, or all of it is in the brain itself... I see how hard it is for stroke victims to return to their old self after the brain has been damaged... and I wondered sometimes if the person I knew was even in the body anymore... It is a question I do not have a firm answer for... but I like to think the spirit exists and just can not use the brain anymore... it is like a computer interface that is damaged and the body has failed to repair itself... Our brains can reroute data, or rebuild some damage..

Even before they've actually seen the Vatican's new handbook stating what makes good and bad advertising, those who create ads are questioning its relevance.

There is no question in my mind that this reality and this process will grow and intensify at a pace even faster than we have already seen as we move further into the next century.