Sentences with phrase «even sees the proofs»

before the publication date, and sometimes before the author even sees the proofs of the finished work.

Not exact matches

Before you choose to share an article yourself, Feedly even lets you see how many shares each article has already received, giving you a sense of «social proof» that others have found an article useful.

Even though he knew the truth and saw with his own eyes the proof that Jesus was the Messiah, he cared so little that he'd let Jesus be killed if it meant he could profit off of it.

So, while your at it how about you providing that irrefutable proof that there is no such God out there who does not want to be made known but would rather have us rely on having faith and that through relying on faith to see whether we would be willing to follow God on our own accord even when there is no irrefutable proof as opposed to having that irrefutable proof and thus having to follow becuase of having really no choice because of obligation.

If there was any proof to even prop up intelligent design as a legitamite scientific theory, then it would be out there for the public to see.

I do hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while claiming to be deep and pious.

He was confident enough in his faith to not see how science could undo what was important in religion even though the Pope at the time tried to twist his ideas into a convoluted «proof» of Creationism which Lemaître resisted.

See even I should go back to school and learn to proof read before hitting submit... «they should» not «there should»

It's alright for you to be so cynical with proof, but a theory and discredit the proof of God's existence even in the things you can see with your eye.

And even more irony is seen when the «science only» people lean on mathematic formulae and theories to explain the universe, but their only proof is more math... Math proving math, but no observable reality to back up the math.

Even Isaiah could not muster up the words to describe what God looks like and our smartest scientists today think quantum theory sounds very impressive to explain without proof the unknowable and that which can not be seen

There is no proof whatsoever that «God is a conscious being who sees or even thinks at all in the first place.

i see no proof of your statements, at least science has the integrity to admitt to whatever being only a theory and not fact — your BELIEF is nothing but a thought you hold on to like a baby and there special blanky... sceince attempts to prove or even to disprove itself, you just go on believing what some silk covered so called humble man with gold in his pockets tells you.

With no metaphysics, no magic, no influence from mental exertions like praying, etc. to be seen even at the quantum level, any and all claims to the contrary, including your whiny «oh it might exist» bullshit, require proof to the contrary because the field has already been cleared.

I think that we should forgive Coquelin for this rash moment and maybe even see it as proof that he is a Gunner who is desperate for the club to do well.

I just saw him make so many special plays with the ball in his hand that Davis is pretty close to bust proof in my eyes, even with the drops.

Dain may be slightly better in ring, but I would even have to see proof of that.

even though there is no proof of him personally taking any money out of the club they would have to declare it under these new financial regulations that have come in, any and all monies going out of the club has to be put in black and white on the accounts and i didn't see that kronke has taken anything when i read them the other day.

And, we'd need to find proof that the people who stayed home actually saw the «dark posts» to even prove correlation, since those particular voters might not have been active on Facebook at all.

If the former, I would very much like to see what you have to offer as proof or even something that could be considered evidence.

Even though it's still cold here, I'm dreaming of all things spring (see the proof in this post and this post) < 3 Today I'm sharing my spring wishlist full of items that... View Post

Anyway, I see plenty of proof that it's possible to keep in style even when the years add up.

What you see above is proof, actual photographic proof, that I came home tonight, popped open a hard cider and enjoyed our warm summer evening.

«I think the proof will be once we can get it in the hands of the teachers and students, even in the pilot phase, people will begin to see the power of this particular interface and the learning growth that isn't going to be incremental, but rather exponential,» Morrill said.

And, as proof that even an old grouch can glean a hint of sensitivity — see aforementioned spouse and son; lessons learned — I will start this criticism by listing what I like about the i8 before I start picking on its inevitable nits.

«And as proof, you will see that every ordered paper respects your requirements and indications, and it even contains your own ideas».

You can see proof of this by simply Googling yourself — many authors find that the Amazon listings for their books show up in Google results even above their own websites.

But before I download even a free book, I check page numbering to rule out novellas and read reviews to see if anything rules out this book, i.e. bad proof - reading / editing, poor grammar, predictable plots.

Remember that even seeing the money go into your account may not be proof it exists, depending on exactly what happens with their check.

We even send proof of coverage directly to your landlord, and in many cases your property manager is able to see the new policy in real time through our innovative platform.

Even though it was more than 15 years ago, I can still see myself holding the proofs for the photo spread on dogs for our children's publication.

I think that golden retrievers are more prone to lymphomas than other dog breeds even though I can not recall seeing proof of this in the veterinary literature.

Even though the labels indicate the refillable bait stations are dog proof, the manufacturers seem not to have met some of the more creative and persistent patients we see in New York City who are able to thwart the protective bait station, allowing them to feast on the contents.

I feel now she has a good outlook on seeing other dogs - proof is in our walks where she will look at other dogs & choose not to get reactive, or even bark!

Hide cords (some home improvement places even carry cord cover as do places that sell baby proofing items) and check to see if your plants are nontoxic.

It's proof that, even after seeing Jaws and its sequels, some people are still willing to pass themselves off as chum — and pay for the pleasure.

the game is way unlively compaired to what they showed not to mention straight up lies about the multiplayer he even was going into details about that lie saying that each person has a lobby attatched to them and there was a chance of seeing people it took a day for that lie to come out they thought since the game is so big no one would ever find some one or have proof some one was at the same spot untill the streamers ruined their day.

But with the Nintendo Labo, we are perhaps seeing even more solid evidence that Nintendo has learned from its past, proof that is even more substantial than the Nintendo Switch and its mighty success.

Still, it is always cool to see games like Half - Life showing up on an Android Wear watch, even if it is a proof - of - concept more than anything else.

Even worse, any proof of the original score has already been destroyed, and people who have seen the original evidence before it was destroyed claim that the score was smudged.

One can see them as proof even to herself that she still exists or as a tender connection to what she must leave behind.

Glad to see at least one scientist is getting more comfortable with saying we know things * must be * happening even when we can't yet provide the evidence, let alone proof.

Of course, your most ardent followers won't see for themselves, even though I put the proof right in front of their ignorant faces.

Now, perhaps in the math proofs, but I didn't see the part about: «Velasco's paper does NOT support the adiabatic lapse rate — not even close.»

You see, I can understand joe public being unaware of the manipulation here, I can even understand scientists in different fields not being aware of it, but what I can't understand is anyone calling themselves a scientist not being able to understand what I'm saying and continuing to defend this fiction, and especially those vaunting their great credentials as proof of their own brilliance.

Or does the person who says there is a huge difference in the state and quality of Science nowadays compared to 100 or even 50 years ago... and will want to see modern and applicable proof showing present instances where the majority of scientists in any field got something completely wrong....

<< >> I assumed your logarithmic relationship; even though I have never seen any formal proof of that relationship, and I projected it back to where we had around 8000 ppm of CO2 which is 4.3 doublings, so that gives a 12.9 deg C rise over today's +15 deg C; or 27.9 deg C for way back then.

Even when you've been the lead scientist of two of the country's most well respected environmental organizations — groups addressing climate change — you may need to see the proof.

Sin is understood to be the best thing to tax, but taxing it is generally seen as impractical, due to sin being generally underground (driven there by laws, with taxes thus reduced to excises on alcohol and tobacco)... However, taxing Carbon is easy, even when Carbon use is regarded as sinful, because there is no chance of anyone covering it up in a big way... All that had to be done was to put a handle on it, on Carbon use as sinful, that bureaucrats could use, scientific proof, formulae, models, and all that, and surround them with minders, Environmental PR minders.

I'll just say that I've seen denialists pointing at some of this articles in The Guardian as a proof that climate science is under question (because EVEN The Guardian has now concerns) and I think people who don't pay much attention to it have actually been misled by the headlines and the comments from skeptics.