Not exact matches
Postpartum haze can make
even the
simplest tasks seem like rocket science — add a wiggling infant to the
equation and it could be a deal breaker.
Even at the time, with scientific meteorology still in its infancy, the idea seemed absurd: key
equations governing the behaviour of the 5 million billion tonnes of air above us had already been identified — and they were anything but
simple.
Perlmutter emphasizes the importance of exercise when he wrote, «the
simple act of moving your body will do more for your brain than any riddle, math
equation, mystery book, or
even thinking itself.»
A
simple bodyweight squat workout uses almost every muscle group in the body — and if you add a dumbbell or barbell into the
equation, I would
even argue that they use every single major muscle group to complete.
Even though this
simple physics
equation is the «holy grail» of fat loss, there are still many great bodyweight exercises that don't lend themselves to being moved over a large distance, yet they can still burn fat and make you strong...
(
Even for a relatively
simple example of a gray medium, calculating the equilibrium temperature profile within a homogeneous slab involves a singular Fredholm integral
equation of the second kind as described by M. N. Ozisik in Radiative Transfer (1973).)
Lorenz was able to show that
even for a
simple set of nonlinear
equations (1.1), the evolution of the solution could be changed by minute perturbations to the initial conditions, in other words, beyond a certain forecast lead time, there is no longer a single, deterministic solution and hence all forecasts must be treated as probabilistic.
But, you are talking to someone who has books with
equations on the nightstand next to the bed, because I enjoy reading them,
even though I only use
simple math now in my work.
From an advertising perspective, they may have been better off not letting us know how many trees were saved, because
even though most of us have forgotten the quadratic
equation, our
simple math abilities allow us to acknowledge the remaining destruction.
Even with the correct
equation, a
simple «slope» may not suffice.
Hence the beautiful
equations of Maxwell in the 19th century and the
even more
simple equation of Einstein, E = MC ^ 2.
Even a
simple pendulum has a nasty non linear ordinary differential
equation.
I have no idea how to post
even the
simple heat transfer
equation and have it look proper.
Climate is Ta (x, y, z) and as we eliminated the complications through statistics of u, Ta is a solution of steady state
equations where the conservation laws and symetries are easy to formulate and to solve (numerically anyway but in
simple cases
even analytically).
But what would be
even more useful is for you to address the various points made, especially about your theory that — so far — waiting on your explanation — fails the basic test of putting together
simple equations.