Sentences with phrase «even simple questions»

Even simple questions like «Are you someone who is trustworthy?»

Now if you have even simple questions about the medication, it will require a phone call to your veterinarian.

The chair of the BIS committee, Iain Wright, accused Sir Philip of being «extraordinarily thin - skinned to even simple questions» and suggested he did not like having his authority questioned.

First of all, if asked even a simple question, you don't want to give a single word answer (yes or no).

Even a simple question, asking for a raise of hands, can be what is necessary to keep students on task.

Even a simple question about your case is designed to get information that can be used against you.

Even the simplest questions, like «Can you tell me a little about yourself?»

Not exact matches

To the average reader of a business magazine, these may seem like ridiculously simple questions, but Lusardi and Mitchell's research over the last few years shows that, in general, you can not count on even this base level of knowledge about how money works.

Even asking one or two simple questions can cause many visitors to leave without taking the desired action.

According to bestselling management author and CNBC contributor Suzy Welch, there is one simple mistake that even the most well - prepared candidates make: They use an interview to answer questions instead of to have a conversation.

Even when you place a simple ad on Facebook, the first question Facebook will ask you is, «who do you want to target?»

It led us to a simple question: Why do some companies thrive in uncertainty, even chaos, and others do not?

SEO ramifications were not entirely flushed out, even as moderator Danny Sullivan and the eager audience asked penetrating questions to delve deeper, but just consider a simple brand preference scenario.

Why even answering simple questions quickly online using social media can improve customer satisfaction

Had Ron and Shamir done even rudimentary research into the identities of said addresses, such as a search on the Bitcoin - OTC site, Bitcoin Talk forums, or even via a simple Google search, they could have easily found that the original very early source address in question (12higD) is, very publicly, one of mine and not one of Satoshi's as they insinuate in their paper.

The problem is simple: Central bankers don't know the answer to either question and as a result are unprepared for the consequences, or even to recognize them while they are occurring.

The question, even in its simplest form, is quite difficult to answer and the implications of that answer have huge impacts on your business.

Even now even Catholic / Christian professors of theology are questioning the bodily resurrection of the simple, preacher man aka JeEven now even Catholic / Christian professors of theology are questioning the bodily resurrection of the simple, preacher man aka Jeeven Catholic / Christian professors of theology are questioning the bodily resurrection of the simple, preacher man aka Jesus.

Questioning and tossing out old, obsolete ideas is what led to desegregation, women's right to vote, gay marriage (albeit as slow as molasses), and even many simple everyday things.

It's really pathetic to see so many Christians that are so LACKING HONESTY and INTEGRITY that they would refuse to answer simple yes - or - no questions or even care enough about TRUTH to admit their own quotes were made.

B) If you've ever watched even the most simple programs on cable TV regarding the Big Bang, the scientists are the first ones to admit that these are questions they can't answer... yet.

At least you're honest, even if you won't answer a simple yes or no question.

Even now even Catholic professors of theology are questioning the bodily resurrection of the simple, preacher man aka JeEven now even Catholic professors of theology are questioning the bodily resurrection of the simple, preacher man aka Jeeven Catholic professors of theology are questioning the bodily resurrection of the simple, preacher man aka Jesus.

Even now Catholic / Christian professors of theology are questioning the bodily resurrection of the simple, preacher man aka Jesus.

I have also found myself looking into the faces of that diversified company of informal students embracing, for example, my colleagues teaching in other fields, as well as those other friends from all walks with whom I spend sustaining nonworking hours and who, ever and again even in the midst of play, put me back to work with «simple» innocent questions about the Bible.

[Conclusion of the astute synopsis by Mr. Entel, followed by his even more astute questions:] Plato, Hancock contends, enacts this yoke between being and knowing by seemingly affirming the simple superiority of theory to practice, thus suppressing the question of the relation between the good of....

Mr. Blake, the answer is very simple but also very truly spiritual few would not even attempt to question.

Maybe he's busy getting his beliefs strengthened as his local house of stupidity, errrr, worship... Maybe he's busy praying to his imaginary friend, asking it to stop those pesky atheists from asking simple questions he can't answer... Maybe he's huddling with the likes of Adelina, HeavenScent and the rest of that ilk on the ultimate proof of their god (s)... Maybe He's realized the only way not to look like an even bigger fool is to remain silent...

Of course, this is not all that Christians believe, or even the major part of what Christians believe, about Jesus Christ; but for our purpose, it is enough now just to admit at least that much, to see here life given in love to the point of complete surrender of self, to agree that the ages witness that this is healthy life, this is wholeness, and then to turn to oneself and ask the very simple but very searching question, «How do I measure up to that standard?»

On the radio I use this simple rule to help me answer the majority of Bible questions I'm asked, even when I'm not familiar with the particular passage.

Even after everything you just wrote, one simple question remains.

Solve for us the question of the reasonableness of athiesm, where you get something (big bang) from nothing — there must be a first cause of everything; explain implications of the anthropic principle and the wildly unprobablistic likelihood that our universe could even form in such a fashion as to be capable of sustaining life (which has, interestingly, your athiest heavy hitters (i.e. Dawkins, Schwartz, etc.) necessarily positing multiple universe theories to get around the near probablistic impossibility of all conditions be present at time of big bang for life to be possible without acknowledgement of a divine designing hand guiding the process); explain The probablistic impossibility of non-irreducibly complex basic cells (life) coming together spontaneously (DNA, cell membrane, etc), even the most basic, simple forms of life allowing for reproduction, metabolism, etc...

If not how do you not only question but condemn or dismiss «God» when you don't even understand the simple basic foundations of existence?

My question to you is simple; how do you take a classic banana cream pie — a beloved pie that will always be held with much esteem by many people — and make it even better?

Second, your directions are clear and simple and cover many questions even before they're asked.

Conte, an expert on performance - enhancing drugs, but not so much baseball, had never even heard of Colabello until the suspension, but had a simple question Sunday evening.

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

Wenger is worse than Sam Allardyce, very poor manager we have at Arsenal, poor, poor, dirt poor, watch Mahrez join Chelsea, anyway, I said it once I'll say it again the answer to all our problomatic questions on this here fine site of ours is simple: Wenger is a very poor mananger, Tony Pulis is even better

simple answer is Yes but whether hes fit enough is another question, But as normal even if Arsenal have played brilliant, got balance for once this season.

No, he should buy Nabil Fekir from lyon is gona dither on transfer as usual and when other teams grab him he will come out with bs like «we almost sign him» there is no questions wenger did great things for Arsenal but he needs to go after the end of this period simple as that is even coming out and say is not going to leave

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Also, it's funny you talk about people seeing «my side» when you and the rest of your ilk can't even answer a simple question of how Colin should've protested against police brutality instead of how he actually went about it.

He had been asked a simple question — had he ever seen anything like the triple save that Jan Oblak had produced — and he gave an even simpler answer.

Sustained access to providers, even the simple ability to call with a question or concern and get a call back, is critical to optimal recovery.

Now comes a period of extraordinary growth, as your toddler goes from speaking a few simple words to asking questions, giving directions, and even telling you stories she's made up.

I don't want to be judgy of the question, even as simple and stark as it is, because I think by the time people arrive at the doorstep of adoption as a family building method, many have already been through the house of horrors, so to speak, of infertility, miscarriage and recurrent loss.

The fact is, we have become so conditioned to believe that the usual method of beginning our infants with runny rice cereal, gradually progressing through smooth then lumpier purees, in defined quantities and on a defined schedule, keeping flavours bland and simple — is the right and indeed the only way to do things, that we don't even think about even questioning why this is the way we do it.

The idea behind the evening is simple — why watch Question Time (QT) on your sofa at home, when you could do it in a bar, drink in hand?

Your questions were getting downvoted and flagged (even spam flagged), and merging them was the simplest solution to a) calm everyone down and b) having at least part of your question answered.

@SoylentGray the EXAMPLE that was given is not even remotely possible, but the basic question is very possible and asking a simple question.