Sentences with phrase «even speak the world»

Not exact matches

Canadian Business spoke to more than a dozen leading experts to gather their advice for surviving — perhaps even thriving — in a world of cheap oil.

At public speaking events in recent years, he's often opened by thanking organizers for inviting a Canadian banker to speak — «In most places right now in the world if you're a banker you don't even go out at nights.»

He's spoken in favor of electing more female politicians, spoken out against racism, and even found time to stay connected with world leaders.

That openness has also been a double - edged sword, however, because it has allowed him to speak his mind freely, even when every political campaign manager in the world would probably advise him not to.

If this is his methodology or his mechanism for communicating with the world, we really don't have an alternative but to start there, even in scenarios right now where we see that the market doesn't necessarily give much of a concern to the details, the ins and outs that he might be speaking to.

Even the most overeducated, underpaid millennial in America is, globally speaking, one of the richest people in the world.

Yet, even for some of us, there are things we shouldn't write for all the world to see ``... speak to your brother in secret and if he hear you, you have gained a brother (Gal 6).

For this reason, some Lutheran theologians prefer to speak of «orders of preservation,» taking into account what God is doing to sustain the world under the conditions of sin, even using means sin - laden themselves, such as war and capital punishment, to fight against still more serious attacks on the goodness of God's creation.

We can even say, in a certain way of speaking, that our Creator's whole point in making the world was that some of his creatures should share in his love.

@@@ Save the world he was Hebrew Isrealite by slaves Desendents he knew that he was not African our people came through HAMITE Africa after the Latin speaking Roman army invasion into Jerusalem ad 70 my people fled into west africa and settled there for about 1400 years until black Arabs Muslims took my people into slavery and sold my people too the Portuguese and the black Muslims Arab called us YAHOODEE even too this day

More than any other Republican candidate (and even more than some Democrats), Santorum speaks openly and passionately about his concern for poor and vulnerable people in the U.S. and around the world.

When we have become intellectually mature enough to give up childish notions of divine intrusions and rescue expeditions, even with respect to Jesus himself (about whom we speak in the next chapter), and to trust in God who is revealing the divine self as actively energizing within the world, we shall be able to have a more soundly based and more credible view of the divine reality.

If God was completly removed we would not have such an intellectual book to even believe in... God can speak through man and many predictions that were in the bible came true already... How can men that have no back grounds of science or physics and basic understand of the world and how it works be able to come up with half the stuff in the bible... Really hard to come up with the figures when your just a fisherman or even a king... Only explains God even more

Lewis managed to do so even as the insistent world pressed in upon him ---- the invitations to speak, the flattering applause, the evidence, all around him, that he had become a Great Man.

God is always active, is always speaking, is always involved, is always answering prayer, and is always working to accomplish His will in the world... even when He is not having people write about it.

There is no other God in the world who died for our sin and raised from the death and he is still living, I know He is living because I have spoke to him even today.

And Yahweh is jewish terminology is the same now that mean Allah and Yahweh are the same being but christian god is unknown I don't know what he is, And Muhammad in the Qur» an is the last of all Prophets and Messengers and is known as Rehmat ul alimeen the mercy of the world he forgive his most bitterest enemies who tortured him and his followers for believing in one true God.Now Muhammad never try to fake a miracle, the pig is forbidden to eat even in the jewish testament and so even here bible agrees but I don't know why christians eat pork.Secondly wine was forbidden because Muhammad's companions saw the evil in it.So please don't speak without having proper knowledge or Blurting out made up stories that actually have no sense, the jews call Jesus the false prophet, Sorcerer, Necromancer etc would you beieve those stories or be angry.Surely we both know the answer

First, it would be consistent with Whitehead's own methodology, in this way to make God the chief exemplar for the understanding of process everywhere else in the world, Secondly, and more importantly, it might help to correct the unfortunate tendency even among Whiteheadians subconsciously to regard actual entities as atoms, minisubstances which are, so to speak, the building blocks of the world process.

But i must say ty to the left you have made this show about the real story of mankind even more popular I think i speak for the other 2.3 billion Christians around the world when i say «Thank You»

The problem with bisexuality in my life (and I can speak only for myself) is that it has been grounded too much in my utopic fantasy of the way things «ought» to be and too little in the more modest recognition of myself as a participant in this society at this time in this world, in which I have both a concrete desire for personal intimacy with someone else and a responsibility to participate in, even witness to, the destruction of unjust social structures — specifically, the heterosexual box.

Even as a Catholic, one can not deny the gorgeous language of The King James version nor its enormous influence on the English speaking world!

He will regard the Church as the audible Yes of consent which he may hope God has spoken even to the No of the world, and across it, the Yes which remains victorious and has long superseded the world's No.

Moltmann does not speak of God's powerlessness or helplessness in quite the way Sölle does, but no more than for her is God a controlling power or even a distinguishable agent of action in the world.

Even if periodic expectations of the end of the world are set aside, it was not an accepted thing during the Middle Ages to speak about the future, and certainly not about any sort of bright future.

But there are some areas of the academy, and of the cultural life of the English - speaking world in general, where these obvious truths about the essentially polemical nature of the intellectual life are called into question, even systematically rejected.

Only as people are helped, even while the No is being spoken, to see beyond it to God's love for them and for the world can they really receive the word of criticism.

In the words of an ancient prayer, it is the visible expression of «that wonderful and sacred mystery» which speaks to us and works on us, through the very imperfection, weakness, error, and even the sin of the empirical institution, to manifest in the world of time and space the abiding reality of God's operation in the event of Christ for human wholeness.

I just don't believe in any organized religion, even though many of the worlds religions all speak of a spiritual realm.

In this harmonious communion of two social worlds the Word of God speaks meaning to a people and even becomes the chemistry of change in that people.

It is with such considerations as these in mind that I would wish to speak of the act of God in Christ as objective, as something built into the structure of the world, even perhaps (as I think that Barth would argue) its very foundation.

We can only say that he is a man if he thinks and speaks and freely questions the whole of the world and his existence, even if he can not answer this one total question.

«Who in the ancient world or the middle ages,» he writes, «even spoke of the virtues of diversity in life or thought?»

Lots of good people didn't speak out against the anti-semitism in Europe before and during World War II, even the modern generation let the genonide in Rwanda happen.

Even those who believe in the immortality of the soul do not have the hope of which Paul speaks, the hope which expresses the belief of a divine miracle of new creation which will embrace everything, every part of the world created by God.

This speaks volumes about the remarkable wisdom, resourcefulness, courage, and godliness it would take to teach and lead in such times, and says a lot about the value God places on women even when the world does not.

It is possible, he says, to speak in nonmythological terms of the finitude of the world and of man before the transcendent power of God, even of the signification of eschatological myths.

A brilliant school of interpretation of Greek mythology would have it that in their origin the Greek gods were only half - metaphoric personifications of those great spheres of abstract law and order into which the natural world falls apart — the sky — sphere, the ocean - sphere, the earth - sphere, and the like; just as even now we may speak of the smile of the morning, the kiss of the breeze, or the bite of the cold, without really meaning that these phenomena of nature actually wear a human face.

Jews, not Hebrew Israelites as far back as the book of Esther were ran out to Gresian, Turkey, and were there for 2000 years, even loosing their Hebrew language, speaking Yiddish, then when the 1897 Herzel Movement came, this is when the jews began to claim Israel, or Zion, and the instigation of both wars, World War I, & II, following the Holocaust, also instigated to establish the vision in Daniel 11:14, exposed by a rich jew, former zionist Benjamin H. Freedman, these jew zionist cracked a few eggs to make an omlet, it has even been found that there wasn't 6mill.

We learned that in all likelihood Jesus did not speak as he does in John's Gospel; that even the synoptic Gospels are a complex mixture of historical memory and post-Easter interpretation; that the image of Jesus as one who deliberately gave his life for the sins of the world is the product of the church's sacrificial theology; and that Jesus probably did not proclaim his own exalted identity, or even think of himself in such terms.

Yes Gary; Jesus is in you as your savour as He is the savour of the world: In Adam all die even so in Christ is All made alive: But I have seen in the past couple days your words and they are not my Lords at all: Christ is not divided or Bi-Polar: He does not cuss like a sailor one day and then minister to the masses the next: No; Christ is consistent, He is Grounded in His word; those that waver are not stable in anything, even as is written: I truly know now the you truly do have a mocking spirit in you, because again Christ is not Bi-polar: Go re-read you other post and see if they are the words of my Lord, then ask if anyone will be willing to follow you even as you are of Christ: The false Christ comes up along side of the truth Christ to pervert everything that is of God: That is how all these sects are again formed, many started of in the truth, but went out from the Word of our Lord even through Paul now to become their own god: You are now an example of what I speak: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:

However, even after the market for Brunner's books in the English - speaking world wanes and his students have passed off the scene, and even when his name is forgotten, Brunner's impact on American theology is likely to continue for a long time.

Conservatives around the world pretty much think alike... or rather not think but like Santorum just speak from the heart... even if it's stupid.

Raised above This scene of bleeding spirits, I can make No sign of recognition or concern Except to speak out from My wooden stake And give them to each other, for I yearn To show the world how caritas unties The bond of blood and flesh, and doing so, Entwines a new knot even as it dies.

Rather, the gift of tongues becomes a gift of speaking in other languages so that people from throughout the world could hear «the mighty works of God» (2:11) Even that miraculous event remains incomplete and misunderstood until it is interpreted by the apostolic preaching.

Even if it made sense to speak, as Whitehead does, of a «world» as the «relative actual world» of a unique event — then how do such «worlds» stand in relation to that real level of abstraction (cf. 2.4) on which actual worlds and actual experiences interact and interpenetrate one another, the level which Whitehead sometimes defines as «nature»?

I am not the only person in the world who speaks for God, although God does speak through me to others and to me through them which gives us a much deeper bond than we have with most people, even those with whom we share a blood bond.

Even in this more secular age, people in the western world tacitly, even if unintentionally, acknowledge Christian faith when they refer to a particular year by number, since the words Anno Domini, strictly speaking, are always implEven in this more secular age, people in the western world tacitly, even if unintentionally, acknowledge Christian faith when they refer to a particular year by number, since the words Anno Domini, strictly speaking, are always impleven if unintentionally, acknowledge Christian faith when they refer to a particular year by number, since the words Anno Domini, strictly speaking, are always implied.

Do even have a clue on what is going on in this world today or is it just ur running off at the mouth problem that u have if it is then I think u can get that cured by stopping and thinking before u speak.

Eliade spoke of an «originative, repeatable primordium,» a sacred, mythic «Great Time,» which invited mortals to a consoling «nostalgia for the perfection of beginnings» and which helped them explain the world, even as it became «the exemplary model for all significant human activities.»

This relation should not be construed in a way that gives priority to the social world, or even in a way that creates a sharp distinction between text and context; rather, it should emphasize the active — and interactive — exchange between the behavior of speaking and the behavior of doing.