With a justice system that is stacked against
him even speaking in court, Marshall has to combat prejudice and the insidious manner it infects almost all.
Not exact matches
Clearly the compassion of the
courts is going to reach far and wide under the new dispensation,
even unto those who can not
speak for themselves because they are «
in a vegetative state or a permanent and irreversible state of unconsciousness.»
But
in my heart I know that my vindicator lives and that he will rise last to
speak in court; and I shall discern my witness standing at my side and see my defending counsel,
even God himself, who I shall see with my own eyes, I myself and no other.17
But
in my heart I know that my vindicator lives and that he will rise last to
speak in court; and I shall discern my witness standing at my side and see my defending counsel,
even God himself, whom I shall see with my own eyes, I myself and no other.9
For most of the game, whenever he gave instructions, I've been reminded of the way a cop
speaks, the sort of
even tone that comes when you know the person you're
speaking to understands there's a consequence for the wrong response,
in this case failure to hustle their asses up the
court.
If you think it was bad last night wait for the Tottenham game, I was
speaking to a mate of mine and he said a lot of the old faces are already planning to come and cause trouble inside and outside, the trouble is all the old faces and some new ones know this Stadium is perfect for hooliganism,
even if they get banned it might be one or two last hurrahs, I expect every game we are allowed to play this season will have similar stories and our name will be dragged through the mud, everyone that is involved
in it if found guilty by a
court should be named and shamed publically so that there families and employers can judge them also.
Hank's literary sex scandal has caused a sensation,
even as he prepares to defend himself
in court and tries to get Karen and Becca to
speak to him, and a movie based on his stolen book begins production.
Saunders
even unsuccessfully sued Parker
in federal
court last year, charging that Parker violated his free - speech protections by barring him from
speaking publicly for the union.
In the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Yaiguaje v. Chevron Corp., Justice James McPherson wrote: «Even before the Ecuadorian judgment was released, Chevron, speaking through a spokesman, stated that Chevron intended to contest the judgment if Chevron los
In the Ontario
Court of Appeal's decision
in Yaiguaje v. Chevron Corp., Justice James McPherson wrote: «Even before the Ecuadorian judgment was released, Chevron, speaking through a spokesman, stated that Chevron intended to contest the judgment if Chevron los
in Yaiguaje v. Chevron Corp., Justice James McPherson wrote: «
Even before the Ecuadorian judgment was released, Chevron,
speaking through a spokesman, stated that Chevron intended to contest the judgment if Chevron lost.
And
even where non-English-
speaking Hispanic plaintiffs are represented by an English -
speaking lawyer, if that lawyer can't
speak any Spanish, then he can't communicate directly with the client and share the kind of advice on those seeming trivialities — like how to answer a question or what tone of voice to use
in the courtroom or what to do to keep from forgetting what to say — that put clients at ease and make them more effective witnesses
in court.
Remember that it won't hurt to
speak with a legal professional
even if you are undecided that you've a genuine lawsuit or if you're feeling that you may be
in part at fault, we will assist you to determine if you've got a
court case.
Generally
speaking, the most difficult aspect of appellate practice isn't the research, which all of us learn to do
in law school, or
even the oral argument, which frequently resembles law school moot
court.
Instead, he says, more contracts now refer to the London
Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) or Geneva, even when the parties are French - speaking — or, in the OHADA zone, to the organisation's own arbitration court, the Cour Commune de Justice et d'Arbitrage (CCJA), whose popularity is growing after a slow s
Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) or Geneva,
even when the parties are French -
speaking — or,
in the OHADA zone, to the organisation's own arbitration
court, the Cour Commune de Justice et d'Arbitrage (CCJA), whose popularity is growing after a slow s
court, the Cour Commune de Justice et d'Arbitrage (CCJA), whose popularity is growing after a slow start.
Lord Judge may not
speak for all members of the judiciary, but
in an age where
even in the UK many more cases are available because
courts send their judgments to free online services such as Bailii, it is worth remembering that not all that is reported has equal standing.
Whether or not one treats the majority opinion's public forum analysis of social networks as «dicta» (which is legalese for «stuff
in an opinion I don't like so I don't consider binding»), all 8 Supreme
Court justices agreed that subscribers have a First Amendment right to access information and
speak online, and that the government can not prohibit a person from accessing content that has nothing to do with preventing repeat offenses —
even when the repeat offense is child molestation, and the evidence arguably supported that child molesters were particularly prone to repetition.
Where the contract terms
speak directly to the issue
in dispute, a
court may not employ equitable considerations to determine the dispute
even if the
court believes that strictly applying the contract terms would be unfair to one of the parties under the circumstances.
During their interview with the Citizen, the lawyers called for a high - level national debate over new media and its growing impact on Canadian
court proceedings and
spoke of how they deliberately put a protective «code of silence» on the Williams evidence —
even within their own office — and how they agonized for days over the statement Edelson read
in court at the end of the hearing.
Even if you are still
in the early stages of the process,
speaking with a competent attorney can give you a better idea of what to expect and how long the process could take to get a prenuptial agreement enforced by the
court.
2) apart from the fact that CJEU stated that
even before EU exercising its power, the MS must still act - when they have the power to do so -
in a matter which does not jeopardise or prejudice the EU, so that the mere «potential» competence does have an effect, limitating the MS action, the parallel is that a negative rule is still a rule, so that the existence of the rule makes the matter «regulated»: - as for the JHA, I must say that whilst I agree with you on the merits, I can see the issue raised by the CJEU, since it is quite the same raised by some national Constitutional
Courts, i.e. that ECHR standards may be
in conflict with national standards and formally
speaking the ECHR is a treaty and therefore has a lower rank that national Constititions, and the decision of the ECHR on the interpretation of such standards within the context of the Convention does not bind the national Constitutional
Court in interpreting the national Constitution standards: e.g..
love and miss my daughter so much she is 10 years old and her mom my ex girlfriend isn't allowing her to talk text facetime Skype message me and my mother they're
in texas I live
in honolulu hi really can't stand this
courts can't do anything too lawyers say nothing they can do either where's the justice this isn't right she doesn't answer my phone calls texts or emails either it has been about two months since I last
spoke with my daughter I'm so upset and angry to be treated this way I want my daughter
in my life too she won't
even let me pick her up to spend summer with me unless she says so because she's her mom please help me please this just isn't right my daughter misses my mom and me I just know she does but her mom is brainwashing her against me and my family help me please to correct this situation immediately
Coldwell Banker Village Green Realty v. Pillsworth (32 A.D. 3rd 568 [3rd Dept.]-RRB-- Order of the Supreme
Court granting broker's motion for summary judgment affirmed;
in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, the broker's right to a commission is not contingent upon performance of the underlying real estate contract, receipt by the seller of the sale price, transfer of title, or
even a formal execution of a legally enforceable sales contract; seller could not utilize the provisions of a subsequently executed sales contract wherein seller agreed to pay broker's commission «if and when title closes» as a bootstrap to avoid her obligation to the broker under the clear and unambiguous provisions of the listing agreement as such language was contained
in the contract of sale prepared by counsel and to which broker was not a party; provisions
in listing agreement that seller would accept a binder or purchase contract contingent upon purchaser's ability to obtain conventional financing and provided any other contingencies
in the binder or purchase agreement are acceptable to the seller
speak only to the type of purchase offer that seller was obligated to accept and does not alter or otherwise qualify broker's right to a commission