There are more subtle issues, such as: if the US's military activity in the middle - east, including our indulgence in «optional wars» is at least partially responsible for the breaking out of absurdly violent
terror organizations, then is it right for the US to compound our own mistaken actions with more military actions of an
even greater magnitude, i.e., by going nuke?
And I don't think it enhances the public view of the
organization in the age of
terror when a director of a whole division actually endorses a publication which recommends destroying civilization as we know it
even using sabatoge if necessay.