We are basically guaranteeing
an even warmer future and much more acidic oceans.
Not exact matches
If a Republican candidate would say, — yes
even if a messiah is coming, people had been saying that for 2000 years, therefore, we are all obliged to preserve the planet for
future generations and human activities do excessively cause global
warming.
Land developers burn forests in Latin America to feed the cattle that fill the cavernous appetites of fast food chains in the United States — and the entire planet gradually
warms, leaving
even the experts in doubt about the
future of our global ecology.
Getting a new boiler, fixing an old one, or
even just topping up loft insulation can lead to a
warmer home in the
future.
The findings were not a total surprise, with
future projections showing that
even with moderate climate
warming, air temperatures over the higher altitudes increase
even more than at sea level, and that, on average, fewer winter storm systems will impact the state.
Global
warming due to mankind's greenhouse - gas emissions from burning fossil fuels already affects the Indian monsoon and — if unabated — is expected to do
even more so in the
future.
A new study takes aim at the mysterious relationship between clouds and climate, and it finds that a
warmer planet could mean fewer clouds, which would mean an
even more sultry
future for the planet
Protecting this salmon stronghold will be
even more important in a
warmer future, says Michael Webster of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, a co-author of the paper along with the U.W. scientists.
By reconstructing past global
warming and the carbon cycle on Earth 56 million years ago, researchers from the Niels Bohr Institute among others have used computer modelling to estimate the potential perspective for
future global
warming, which could be
even warmer than previously thought.
A
warming climate makes for a brutal allergy season in the U.S., which may become
even worse in
future
«Warning from the past:
Future global
warming could be
even warmer.»
A new study by NOAA researchers suggests
future warming of ocean waters off the Northeastern U.S. may be greater and occur at an
even faster rate than previously projected.
Rosenthal says that if carbon dioxide emissions become taxed in the
future due to continuing concerns about global
warming, his solar - driven catalyst for making synthetic fuel will compete
even better economically with fossil fuels.
A large enough number of such roofs could «completely offset
warming due to urban expansion and
even offset a percentage of
future greenhouse
warming over large regional scales,» says sustainability scientist Matei Georgescu at Arizona State University, who lead the research.
Even if climate negotiations in Paris are successful, the planet is locked into long - term
warming and an uncertain
future.
As global temperatures continue to increase, the hastening rise of those seas as glaciers and ice sheets melt threatens the very existence of the small island nation, Kiribati, whose corals offered up these vital clues from the
warming past — and of an
even hotter
future, shortly after the next change in the winds.
Greenpeace's goal in India is to stop all new coal - fired power plants because the resulting carbon emissions would contribute to global
warming,
even though scientists caution that renewable energy has not yet matured enough to supplant
future coal - fired generation.
Breaking the gridlock on global
warming, which will make it easier for these countries to do
even more in the
future, will require less intrusive approaches, such as flexible commitments and peer review.
In a
warmer climate, the atmosphere can hold
even more moisture, so it is not surprising that the number of atmospheric river days will increase in the
future.
The room for «reasonable doubt» is closing and is (IMHO) just about gone; but
even that leaves many issues — e.g. the size of
future warming — to settle — William]
Following this path for
even another decade would doom efforts to keep
future warming below 2 °C.
In particular, when we speak about targets of 2 degrees, or
even 1.5 degrees, we should remember that climate science has yet to uncover a simple deterministic relationship between carbon emissions and the level of
future global
warming.
The findings have important implications in terms of planning for sea level rise, as ever - growing coastal communities might have to plan for
even higher ocean levels in a
warmer future.
The steady uptick in
warming,
even with a relative slowdown in recent decades, means that the likelihood of seeing a record cold year in the
future is, according to a quick calculation by Mann, «astronomically small.»
And
even though I know we have a couple more freezes in our
future, I can't help but be inspired by all the pretty pastels and
warm weather clothes.
Instead of some nice and
warm spring weather it has been
even snowing again these days, so no way to wear some sun glasses in near
future: / but instead I have a more appropiate clothing item for these chilly days: a Floral Beads Patchwork Blouse from Froomer... actually, it is like a thin pullover / sweater type of blouse...
But
even if you're not planning to travel to a
warm destination and would rather go skiing, camping or on a museum - hopping adventure, starting to brainstorm for your next trip together is a great opportunity to talk about your
future as a couple in a fun and exciting way.
If the story is set in a flooded
future and the guy
even says the words «global
warming» I'm already out.
But if you think you have all the money you want and need, both for your benefit and for the benefit of subsequent generations; you have no fear of losing it; your family relationships are
warm, unconditionally loving, and supportive; and your
future is
even bigger and brighter than your past, then please still read this book.
Even in a
warming climate, we could experience an extraordinary run of cold winters, but harsher winters in
future decades are not among the most likely nor the most serious consequences of global
warming.
Even if the study were right... (which it is not) mainstream scientists use * three * methods to predict a global
warming trend... not just climate computer models (which stand up extremely well for general projections by the way) under world - wide scrutiny... and have for all intents and purposes already correctly predicted the
future -(Hansen 1988 in front of Congress and Pinatubo).
Gavin Schmidt writes, «The suggested «doubling» of the rate of
warming in the
future compared to
even the most extreme scenario developed by IPCC is thus highly exaggerated.
Moreover,
even if methane leakage were to remain modest in some areas, long - term climate models suggest that
warming trends have less to do with the rate of methane leakage and more to do with other variables, such as the thermal efficiency of
future coal plants and whether the switch to gas is permanent or a bridge to zero - carbon energy.
Given those two factors and ignoring
future emissions that will drive the temperature
even higher, we are already over +2 C
warming once we stop emitting short - lived coal smoke and other pollutants into the air and we give the Earth time to reach temperature equilibrium.
Even with these possible issues, it buys us 50 years of economic growth and technological development and a net reduction in the heat content of the ocean, that the
future warming must overcome.
Nobel Prize - winning economist Kenneth Arrow wrote recently that «These calculations [on costs and benefits of slowing global
warming] indicate that,
even with higher discounting, The Stern Review's estimates of
future benefits and costs imply that mitigation makes economic sense.»
If we shut down Indian Point and other nuclear power plants, we will become
even more dependent — at least for the foreseeable
future — on fossil fuels, which, in addition to spewing out toxic pollutants, also contribute to global
warming.
That can not change quickly,
even if it means a much
warmer world for
future generations.
No, it translates to climate models can not accurately represent natural climate variability, which is why they can't project
future global temperature at
even the 2 % confidence level: «we find that the continued
warming stagnation of fifteen years, 1998 - 2012, is no longer consistent with model projections
even at the 2 % confidence level» — vonStorch (2013)
2 — For
future planning, it is more likely the world will be
warmer rather than colder
even if you exclude potential human - caused forcing (i.e. based on a continuation of the current overall trend, which has been broadly similar for a couple of centuries).
Ian Blanchard writes» — For
future planning, it is more likely the world will be
warmer rather than colder
even if you exclude potential human - caused forcing (i.e. based on a continuation of the current overall trend, which has been broadly similar for a couple of centuries).»
Even with zero
future warming.
Even without a bit of
future warming, he wins this bet.
Recent modeling work also points toward
future collapse,
even at reduced rates of
warming and decay from the present (19).
Four degrees of
warming could raise global sea levels by 1 or possibly
even 2 meters by 2100 (and would lock in at least a few additional meters over
future centuries).
And,
even more painful, it will be forced to reduce all the
future warming projections in the SPM report significantly.
While forecasting the state of the environment more than 80 years into the
future is a notoriously inexact exercise, academics gathered by the the United Nations at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are concerned the world is headed for «extensive» species extinctions, serious crop damage and irreversible increases in sea levels
even before Trump started to unpick the fight against global
warming.
In which case, a story reporting James Hansen's claim that global
warming will «result in a rise in sea level measured in metres within a century» will be put in the AGW dominant / exclusive categories, while a story along the lines of «global
warming unlikely to cause significant problems to New York City in the near
future» will find itself in one of the sceptic categories —
even though the latter is closer than the former to the IPCC position.
How is this vaguely stupid as compared idea that we getting hotter, that significantly bad things have happen due to insignifcant amounts of
warming [barely measurable] and that our
future includes Greenland melting, or
even more ludicrous Antarctic melting.
We believe that global
warming since 1850 may have triggered decreases in fire frequency in some regions and
future warming may
even lead to further decreases in fire frequency....