Peter Cunningham, Education Post — «What begins as a program for low - income kids could become a program for middle - income and
even wealthy kids.
Not exact matches
It will take a Sandy Hook every week, where children of
wealthy and powerful
kids get blown away — week after week, and where Zimmerman wannabes respond and the crossfire kills
even more.
Even in
wealthy areas,
kids can go hungry.
If
kids from all walks of life —
wealthy, poor, white, black, Hispanic, Asian, gay, straight, immigrant, native born, Native American, with and without special needs, bilingual, monolingual, rural, suburban, urban —
even if
kids from all of these groups got equally high test scores, would that satisfy us that we could stop waging this civil rights struggle?
Wealthy families can send their
kids to prestigious prep schools like Choate, Loomis, or Hotchkiss while families who don't have the same resources are often relegated to the district schools in their cities and towns,
even if they're not working for their
kids.
Taking job creation, workforce development, transportation, healthcare, etc out of the conversation about
kids in poverty (these aspects get little attention compared to schooling,
even health doesn't come close) because schooling will take care of all that is just playing into the hands of corporate and
wealthy interests.
That many an educational leader has used these annual results to push hard conversations (and
even harder actions) to ensure we are holding ourselves and each other responsible for educating all
kids — not just the
kids from
wealthier zip codes — to high levels?
Even the
kids of
wealthy people can't afford to have children, that means we don't get grandchildren.