For
event attribution assessments to be most useful, remaining scientific uncertainties need to be robustly assessed and the results clearly communicated.
Not exact matches
Otto, a climate scientist at the University of Oxford, also works with Climate Central's World Weather
Attribution program, which attempts to conduct rapid attribution assessments in the days and weeks afte
Attribution program, which attempts to conduct rapid
attribution assessments in the days and weeks afte
attribution assessments in the days and weeks after an
event.
Some
attribution assessments that link
events to dynamically driven changes in circulation have been criticized on the grounds that small signal - to - noise ratios, modeling deficiencies, and uncertainties in the effects of climate forcings on circulation render conclusions unreliable and prone to downplaying the role of anthropogenic change.
The paper considers the necessary components of a prospective
event attribution system, reviews some specific case studies made to date (Autumn 2000 UK floods, summer 2003 European heatwave, annual 2008 cool US temperatures, July 2010 Western Russia heatwave) and discusses the challenges involved in developing systems to provide regularly updated and reliable
attribution assessments of unusual or extreme weather and climate - related
events.
Although the demand for
attribution assessments is higher shortly after an
event occurs, most scientific studies become available several months later.
A week after the
event the climateprediction.net team, together with the World Weather
Attribution team, provided an initial
assessment of the influence of anthropogenic climate change on the likelihood of one - day precipitation
events averaged over an area encompassing northern England and southern Scotland using data and methods available immediately after the
event occurred.