Your family is financially compensated in
the event of your death by a lumpsum amount taken as life cover
Again, if the policy specifically excludes payment of benefits in
the event of death by suicide, they may deny the claim.
While it is death that gets covered by such term plans of LIC Anmol Jeevan II, it does not simply takes into account or work its way out on
the event of any death by unnatural causes such as taking one's own life in the form of suicide especially within a year of purchasing or going for a renewal of the policy.
On 28th February 2015, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley announced the two insurance schemes, Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana (PMSBY) and Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (PMJJBY), which would provide insurance cover in the unfortunate
event of death by any reason or disability due to an accident.
The insured will still be covered in
the event of death by war.
The benefit is payable to a designated beneficiary in
the event of death by a lump sum of 4 x annual basic salary.
Beginning, «This is only to be played in
the event of my death by assassination, «the setting shifts to New York City on his fateful 40th birthday when he met Scott Smith (James Franco), a handsome, young newcomer from Jackson, Mississippi.
Not exact matches
The three
events described
by the largest % ages
of Americans as not too important included the
death of Muhammad Ali (50 %), approval
of recreational marijuana use in four states (43 %), and the
death of Fidel Castro (40 %).
Except in the
event of the optionee's
death, if the shares are disposed
of prior to the expiration
of the statutory holding periods (a «Disqualifying Disposition»), generally, the amount
by which the fair market value
of the shares at the time
of exercise exceeds the total exercise price will be ordinary income.
Succession planning is a key area that needs to be thoroughly looked into
by family businesses in the
event of a
death, retirement or liquidation
of any shareholder.
Popular among travel rewards cards, this perk covers you and your family in the
event of accidental
death and dismemberment when traveling
by airplane, train, boat or bus — provided that the fare was paid
by the credit card.
Also, we know its a historical fact that no part
of the New Testament was actually written
by anyone who ever met Jesus or witnessed the
events first hand; much
of the New Testament was written 200 years after the
death of Jesus.
He said: «We gather today, a community shocked
by the
event which caused the
death of Rae Logie, struggling to comprehend all that has happened here among us.
Since that ghastly
event, most churches have repudiated the false charge
of deicide, which implied that the Jews were accursed
by God because they put the Son
of God to
death.
This transition is effected
by the
death of the abstract and alien God in the kenotic process
of Incarnation and Crucifixion; but a religious form
of faith can only grasp this process as a series
of events that are autonomous and external to human consciousness.
While the Christian proclaims that this process is triumphant in Christ, or that it is inaugurated in its final form
by the
events of the Incarnation and the Crucifixion, it does not follow that the process itself ceases to move forward in all that history following the
death of Christ.
The church is an organism brought into being
by the unique series
of events associated with the life and
death of Jesus
of Nazareth.
your delusional if any
of it doesn't sound like an explaination
of a natural
event or something like
death where all we have is to guess... its all stone age beliefs and some people are still as smart as ug the stone age hunter who says thank you to the gods
of the plains and stars for providing animals to hunt and light to hunt
by.
Church members, led
by pastor Fred Phelps, believe God is punishing the United States for «the sin
of homosexuality» through
events including soldiers»
deaths.
«While noting that the burial tradition may be simply a postulate «derived from the fact
of Jesus»
death or knowledge
of Jewish purity concerns» rather than the memory
of an historical
event, Luedemann's own preference, influenced in part
by John 19:31 - 37 and Acts 13:20, is that Jesus was buried
by Jews who were not his followers.
Christianity is a dialectically monotheistic faith in which the nature and purposes
of the Ultimate are illumined
by historical
events culminating, though
by no means terminating, in the life,
death and resurrection
of the Jewish teacher Jesus, called
by faith the Christ.
Whatever may have been the actual course
of events, historically speaking, which the New Testament means to signify when it speaks
of the resurrection
of Jesus Christ, it is at least clear that it was the conviction
of the New Testament writers, building on the testimony
of the disciples after the crucifixion
of Jesus — as it has been the continuing conviction
of millions
of Christian people since that time — that far from Jesus» being «put out
of the way»
by his
death at the hands
of the Roman authorities in Palestine, he was «let loose into the world.»
Theologians who have quite properly protested against the notion that God was such that he needed to be made friendly and available to his creatures
by reason
of some
event (in this case the
death of Christ) which opened up for him this possibility, have failed to see that in this inadequate and often misleading way
of speaking, there was an insight
of which they should have taken due account.
If historical actions were only isolated
events the life and
death of Jesus would be just an incident without effect or power; but if history is constituted
by remembered and interpreted
events, then what Jesus has done enters into the texture
of history.
He examines the speeches in Acts and also the editorial skeleton in Mark, and he finds that they follow a more or less common pattern: the ministry began with the «baptism»
of John, that is, his message
of repentance and work as a baptizer; following John's arrest, Jesus began his own ministry in Galilee, and there «went about doing good,» and «healing all that were possessed
by the devil»; then he came up to Jerusalem, where the rulers put him to
death by crucifixion; on the third day he rose again, and appeared to his disciples, who were now «witnesses» to the truth
of these reported
events, namely to his resurrection from the dead.
A majority
of commentators on this
event emphasize that Peter misunderstands and that Jesus, knowing that Peter needs to understand what confessing Jesus as the Christ will mean, addresses any misunderstanding
by foretelling his own suffering and
death.
But Christianly understood
death is
by no means the last thing
of all, hence it is only a little
event within that which is all, an eternal life; and Christianly understood there is in
death infinitely much more hope than merely humanly speaking there is when there not only is life but this life exhibits the fullest health and vigor.
Those who defend the view that the resurrection
of Jesus was an historical
event in the physical world unintentionally detract from the significance
of the
death of Jesus, the real center
of Christian proclamation,
by making it dependent upon a subsequent
event.
It was here, on the eve
of Pentecost 1544, that a famous miracle took place — Philip saw the Holy Spirit enter him in the form
of a ball
of fire, and come to rest in his heart (after his
death, an autopsy showed that the heart had actually been enlarged
by this
event, and the ribs forced outward).
An
event occurs that could not have been performed
by any
of the natural agents at work in the world: for example, a man at the point
of death is restored in a moment to perfect health.
Although the actual
event occurred in one place, at one time, and was limited
by all the conditions
of a historical setting, Jesus»
death is understood to be beneficial for all people, in all places, at all times.
It can only be healed
by the presence
of meaning in all
events and relationships
of life».44» Also «the liberation
of the believer from the prison
of sin, law and
death, is brought
by God, not
by politics.
In a similar way, the universal effect
of Jesus»
death seems to be undercut
by the relational view that God includes all experiences and all
events and all people in God's relation to the world.
In fear, fear
of death,
of pain,
of despair,
of fear itself, I have prayed for strength, for hope, for courage, but perhaps like you I have always felt it foolish to pray that the pain itself would go away, although I have been driven to my knees
by the immense force
of several terrible
events.
This freedom which is Christ and which he gives is appropriated
by the man who obeys the call to this freedom in faith and through the baptism which is its expression, submitting himself to the
event that opens the prison
of the world; namely the incarnation,
death and resurrection
of the Son.
A large number
of leading New Testament scholars have now rejected these traditions as unhistorical, leaving us with two conclusions: the first, that none
of the Gospels was written
by an eye - witness
of the
events described in it, and the second, that the earliest Gospel, that
of Mark, was written thirty - five years or more after the
death of Jesus, and the other three Gospels were written nearly sixty years or more after the same point.
If our analysis
of Jesus»
death is correct, this
event signified a defeat for God
by the forces
of evil, so much so that God was not able to comfort Jesus in the hour
of his deepest need on the cross.
He noted that he was not an uncritical f an
of Kennedy, but added «I was enormously impacted
by his
death and the media
events.»
Western Christianity has tried to get God off the hook for creating so brutal a world
by contending that the introduction
of suffering and
death into the world was a historical
event, not the ontological precondition
of existence.
Our identification with the
death of Christ, it maintains, is not merely a present
event, but a present
event controlled
by a real
event of the past — i.e. the dying
of Christ: «Bultmann takes over from Heidegger the concept
of existence, and uses it to describe the stripping away
of illusions and the consequent entry into the authentic human existence.
But in the chronic case, where the patient is not in imminent danger
of death, the omission
of assisted N&H is a lethal omission, for
by that omission we set in motion a chain
of events known to be
death - dealing.
but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his
death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding
of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding
of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real
events from a real historical person but not a magical being
by any means!
In a study
by Thomas H. Holmes and Richard H. Rahe
of the University
of Washington medical school, surveying the opinions
of 394 individuals on the amount
of readjustment required to meet life
events, the
death of a spouse had been given the highest rating.
Alternatively — the Church is familiar with the concept
of «retroactive grace» (e.g. the Immaculate Conception effected
by the once for all time eternal sacrifice
of Calvary)-- perhaps the
death of the dinosaurs was «similarly» caused
by the cosmic primordial
event of The Fall rippling out through time and space.
If sacrifice
of Jesus Christ once - for - all on Calvary for the sins
of the whole world is a dominant motif
of Holy Communion, do we really proclaim the Lord's
death by word and action in ways which communicate this redemptive
event to all who see and hear?
A third possible reason is the sudden toll
of death among the Assyrian forces
by plague (the angel
of the Lord, 19:35) The sequence and detail
of events may now be irrecoverable and we do not doubt the influence
of popular legend in the third possible explanation.
Theologically speaking, this saving
event proclaimed
by the kerygma shows itself to be eschatological precisely
by recurring in the proclamation
of the kerygma itself: the act
of proclaiming Jesus»
death and resurrection becomes God's act calling upon me to accept my
death and receive resurrected life.»
Now all
of the elements we have proposed as essentially constituting the
event are historical elements: the man Jesus, his life, teaching,
death and resurrection, the creation
of the church
by the Spirit are all truly historical.
The primitive conceptions
of clean and unclean lie at the bottom
of these rules; there are certain things and certain
events in natural human life (like birth and
death) which bring man under the influence
of mysterious dæmonic forces; there are actions and situations in life which are full
of these dangerous powers or are threatened
by them.
Hasker's third proposition is that for the problem
of divine non-intervention to be a real problem, «we must be able to identify specific kinds
of cases in which God morally ought to intervene but does not» Many critics
of (traditional) theism probably already have a more or less vague list
of such cases, which might include genocidal
events, such as the Nazi holocaust and the Rwandan massacre; wars; large - scale natural disasters; conditions
of chronic poverty, in which millions
of children die from starvation or are permanently stunted because
of inadequate protein; the sexual molestation
of children, which often leaves them psychologically scarred for the rest
of their lives;
death preceded
by long, painful illnesses, such as cancer or AIDS, or
by mind - destroying conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease; and the kinds
of events described
by Dostoyevski, such as the soldier using his pistol to get a mother's baby to giggle with delight and then blowing its brains out.