In other words, it's less about the actual
events than the myth that is built up around them, especially for the majority of people who will never set foot inside.
Not exact matches
Ogden stated in Christ Without
Myth (1961) that he intended to express the «objective» reality of the
event Jesus Christ more adequately
than Bultmann had succeeded in doing, but that this would have to come in a later work.17 His fullest treatment of the problem thus far appeared in 1963 in his essay, «What Sense Does it Make to Say, «God Acts in History»»?
If you don't believe the
events in the Gospels really happened, you should have better reasons
than the (questionable) idea that since the Gospels contain parallels to ancient
myths, the Gospels must also be
myths.
Thus
myth to Frankfort is primarily important as a form of thought rather
than as an embodiment of concrete
events.
The French Revolution of 1789, perhaps more
than any other
event in recent history, has implanted in western consciousness the
myth of the heroic popular revolt against oppressive authority.
The chief points of change are, first, that the scene has been transferred from the supernatural world of the gods to the earthly sphere of human history; secondly, that It is not a god who experiences the renewal of life (for the God of Israel is not himself subject to death and resurrection, but on the contrary initiates and controls these
events) but the people of Israel, who look in hope for restoration when their existence is threatened; and thirdly, that this hope is expressed as a metaphor describing the historical future, rather
than as a
myth of cosmic renewal.
Of the kernel of history which transcends the
myth, Bultmann can speak only in negative terms: «Our interest in the
events of his life, and above all in the cross, is more
than an academic concern with the history of the past.
Bultmann has asked the question whether salvation history, in its formal aspect at any rate, is to be regarded as
myth rather
than history, and as
myth not only in its outer framework but in its essential core, in the
event of Jesus Christ.
However, these complications are rare and the risk of these
events is comparatively lower while on the pill
than during pregnancy.This is not to say that all or most women should be on the pill, but it is to say that there are many
myths about the pill that ought to be reconsidered.
If you feel that way in a book, you are trapped in a
myth somewhere, more
than likely Book as
Event.