Furhtermore, i get that variable injectors are less simple and more expensive, but
the ever increasing emission regulations demand for better (more expensive) techniques anyway.
Not exact matches
Basically, it is due to the
ever -
increasing levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas
emissions humanity pumps into the atmosphere.
The President's program will accelerate
increases in fuel economy and impose the first -
ever national greenhouse gas
emission standards on cars and trucks
Yet despite all the complexities, a firm and
ever - growing body of evidence points to a clear picture: the world is warming, this warming is due to human activity
increasing levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and if
emissions continue unabated the warming will too, with increasingly serious consequences.
Like their predecessors, Bolin and Eriksson ran the calculations regarding possible temperature changes for a doubling of carbon dioxide, but this time assuming
emissions would
increase and
increase yet more on an
ever - steepening upward path.
In 1980, due to
ever -
increasing emissions restrictions, Pontiac dropped all of its large displacement engines.
Additional engine features: Iron cylinder block and aluminum DOHC cylinder head Forged steel crankshaft and connecting rods Oiling circuit that includes a dedicated feed for the turbocharger to provide
increased pressure at the turbo and faster oil delivery Piston - cooling oil jets 16.5:1 compression ratio Common rail direct injection fuel system Ceramic glow plugs for shorter heat - up times and higher glow temperatures Balance shaft that contributes to smoothness and drives the oil pump Laminated steel oil pan with upper aluminum section that contributes to engine rigidity and quietness B20 bio-diesel capability The Duramax 2.8 L is the cleanest diesel truck engine
ever produced by General Motors, and meets some of the toughest U.S.
emissions standards, thanks in part to a cooled exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system.
Don't expect the 458 to be green — it isn't designed to be, but for what it is Ferrari has tried to reduce
emissions to comply with standards of
ever -
increasing stringency.
Ever increasing human CO2
emissions have resulted in over 15 years of no warming.
Ideas that we should
increase aerosol
emissions to counteract global warming have been described as a «Faustian bargain» because that would imply an
ever increasing amount of
emissions in order to match the accumulated GHG in the atmosphere, with
ever increasing monetary and health costs.
The problem is, I don't think you can tell China (who is making great strides against poverty) «It is likely that
emissions restrictions will put a damper on your growth, but there is a possibility that there will be a proliferation of alternative energies beyond anything we have
ever seen before, and you could see an
increase in growth».
If anything the role of sustainable development has taken on an
ever -
increasing footprint in climate policy debates, which may render untenable a narrow focus on
emissions.
I reject the idea that it is somehow inappropriate to acknowledge that catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is not only possible but plausible if we continue with anything close to business as usual consumption of fossil fuels and the other activities that are contributing to
ever -
increasing GHG
emissions.
Total CO2
emissions in the US have steadily
increased ever since we began measuring them — and all the current administration is willing to do is say their should be voluntary programs to reduce CO2 per dollar of GDP (not per capita, not total
emissions).
But, he continued, soaring oil and gas prices, the
increasing vulnerability of energy supply routes and
ever -
increasing emissions of climate - destabilising carbon dioxide are «symptoms of a considerable malaise in the world of energy.»
However, human CO2
emissions have been
increasing faster than
ever since 1994 so why would the cooling stratospheric temperature trend have stopped?
As early as the 1970s, scientists began to warn that humanity's
ever -
increasing production of greenhouse gas
emissions would change the Earth's climate.
China's carbon
emissions have been
increasing ever faster as they have repeatedly reduced the carbon intensity of their economy.
The EU's unilateral climate policy is absurd: first consumers are forced to pay
ever increasing subsidies for costly wind and solar energy; secondly they are asked to subsidise nuclear energy too; then, thirdly, they are forced to pay increasingly uneconomic coal and gas plants to back up power needed by intermittent wind and solar energy; fourthly, consumers are additionally hit by multi-billion subsidies that become necessary to upgrade the national grids; fifthly, the cost of power is made even more expensive by adding a unilateral
Emissions Trading Scheme.
The
increased temperature results in
increased emissions (to the 4th power of T) to tend restore the energetic balance — if
ever an imbalance existed given the temperature that greenhouse gases are emitted at.
And with the seemingly limitless sources of
emission — from general breathing of countless living species to vehicular and industrial
emissions — the amount of carbon dioxide seems to be
ever increasing.
An upper limit that could
ever be reached (assuming the
increase is caused by human
emissions) would seem to be based on the total amount of fossil fuels remaining on our planet.
«Anthropogenic greenhouse gas
emissions have
increased since the pre-industrial era, driven largely by economic and population growth, and are now higher than
ever,» the IPCC reported in 2014.
Already the world's third - largest emitter of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, India is attempting to do something no nation has
ever done: build a modern industrialized economy, and bring light and power to its entire population, without dramatically
increasing carbon
emissions.
For example, the LN trend of growth of GST in the BEST data from 1978 - 2009 is in fact negative and statistically significantly so, with a high but negative t - statistic, despite the
ever -
increasing growth of
emissions.
Although there have been jumps and dips, average atmospheric temperatures have risen little since 1998, in seeming defiance of projections of climate models and the
ever -
increasing emissions of greenhouse gases.»
Its greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions are driven by the
ever ‐
increasing demand for mobility and movement of goods.
Because temperature rises caused by greenhouse gas
emissions are expected to trigger dangerous feedback loops, which will release
ever increasing amounts of greenhouse gases.
Yet despite all the complexities, a firm and
ever - growing body of evidence points to a clear picture: the world is warming, this warming is due to human activity
increasing levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and if
emissions continue unabated the warming will too, with increasingly serious consequences.
This should be actively encouraged as it both helps China reduce
emissions and helps the world reduce its
emissions through our
ever -
increasing consumption.
If you are referring to the ppm
increase that is supposedly attributable to the
emissions then how does that
ever go away?
His evidence concluded that the earth was warmer in 1988 than
ever before, that human - caused
emissions were responsible for the warming, and that temperatures were likely to continue to rise,
increasing the likelihood of extreme weather events.
The fact that the oceans — and not the land — were so warm last year should deeply worry us... There's evidence the Earth's oceans are undergoing never - before - seen change... When you couple 2014's record - setting oceans with our
ever -
increasing greenhouse gas
emissions, it portends an ominous surge of heat globally — on both land and in the oceans — for years to come.
Temperatures around the world are rising due to the
ever -
increasing greenhouse gas
emissions most of which come from burning fossil fuels — coal, oil, and gas — for energy, but which are also released by deforestation and industrialized agriculture.
In 2010, as the weather became increasingly catastrophic, carbon - dioxide
emissions increased by the largest percentage
ever recorded.
Secondly, I wonder if anyone
ever pointed out to him the irony in encouraging the hon Gentleman to «not always believe everything he reads», directly following his statement that «scientists have linked greenhouse gas
emissions to an
increased risk of major floods.»
At some point between 1800 and 1960, a point was crossed over whereby anthropogenic
emissions became large enough to produce an
ever -
increasing accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Or another way to characterize it, there seems to be an
ever increasing amount of human
emission which get absorbed as these human
emission * dramatically
increase * within the 50 or so years.
Given the rate of China's economic growth and its large population, it's perhaps unsurprising that the country is responsible for an
ever increasing share of global
emissions.
The positive feedback would reveal its existence if global temperatures were accelerating to a tipping point of runaway warming, due to the
ever -
increasing human CO2
emission releases into the atmosphere,
When
ever an existing company
increases or decreases their carbon
emissions, or someone starts a new business, they will need to either buy or sell carbon permits and it will be the brokers who will earn all the profits.
Like their predecessors, Bolin and Eriksson ran the calculations regarding possible temperature changes for a doubling of carbon dioxide, but this time assuming
emissions would
increase and
increase yet more on an
ever - steepening upward path.
First, the idea has to actually work, second, the side effects need to be minimal, and third, it has to be able to keep up with an
increasing forcing from
ever higher greenhouse gas levels, and fourth, it has to be cheaper than the simply reducing
emissions at source.
But given that CO2
emissions and atmospheric CO2 concentrations are higher than
ever and
increasing more rapidly than
ever, it does not seem premature to start thinking about what we might do should disaster strike, even if only to make sure that we do not rashly do something that might merely make matters worse.