Sentences with phrase «ever see any evidence of»

Did you ever see any evidence of a supernatural entity, or did mommy and daddy tell it to you as a kid, again and again, and you finally believed it?

Not exact matches

No amount of scientific data or evidence would ever convince them that it wasn't God that put the tornado in their path... they just see it as God challenging them.
@jujubee: Your right I can't honestly say that «god does not exist» is a fact; but, I can honestly say that «all of the evidence I have ever seen indicates that god does not exist» and «I have seen no evidence that god exists»
No has ever seen actual evidence of your brain or your soul, so we should also conclude that you have no brain and you as a person don't exist.
Why is it — if we have all this power — we rarely, if ever, see any evidence of it in our lives?
But sin in a believers life will also create seperation in their relationship with God, and we can see evidence of this in human examples for anyone who has ever been a parent.
So rather than engaging with the mountains of evidence that I brought, because this situation was one of the most well - documented cases of institutional cover - up I have ever seen, ever, there was a complete refusal to engage with the evidence.
Evidence of the fact that union differentiates is to be seen all round us — in the bodies of all higher forms of life, in which the cells become almost infinitely complicated according to the variety of tasks they have to perform; in animal associations, where the individual «polymerises» itself, one might say, according to the function it is called upon to fulfil; in human societies, where the growth of specialization becomes ever more intense; and in the field of personal relationships, where friends and lovers can only discover all that is in their minds and hearts by communicating them to one another.
You don't need nor will you ever see evidence for sure of that, but I believe that if you religious nut jobs knew anything about gods natural laws you would instinctively know that.
I'm confused, what kind of invisible evidence have you ever seen in a court?
It's because I see ever more evidence of the need for it.
Yes, this was evidence that God also was upset about what this man named Jesus was teaching, and had seen fit to make Him a public spectacle in the sight of all so that nobody would ever again seek to challenge the teachings of the religious leaders or the traditions of the Jewish people.
You have to find your own reason to believe because if you don't this Christian walk won't ever ever make any sense to you.You say you care only for Christianity because «they impose their laws into secular law» but I think deep down you are lying to yourself.Islam has manifested itself into many many nations with their own law, I don't see you ever demand evidence of Allah heck even what their religion states.You say you demand evidence only when religions impose their laws into secular law but..
But when did majorities ever intimidate Hartshorne, especially when he saw evidence of genius on his side?
I guess I'll know it when I see it, but as of now, no one has ever presented me with anything that I can consider as actual, factual evidence that the God of the bible is real.
If they EVER were to be suspended, we would see evidence of that suspension in at least a couple of the billions of experiments that have been conducted in the last 400 years of formal science investigation.
«Usually after some great terrifying event» — that is some nice anecdotal evidence of religion as a neurological disorder if I've ever seen any.
and the limitations of survey evidence (see Robert Wuthnow, «In Polls We Trust»), Zuckerman is correct that «these are the highest rates of atheism / agnosticism ever reported in an American survey.»
I will re-evaluate my opinion if I ever see a piece of evidence to say Wenger doesn't like spending rather than Silent Stan doesn't like spending.
What really galls me is that Wenger gets paid 8 million a year to manage a side and yet even the lowest paid bin man who is an arsenal fan can see that OG and Theo are NOT nor will they EVER be up to scratch un yet Wenger persisits against all the evidence because he so desperately wants to prove the world wrong about either or both of the afore mentioned.
I see very little evidence, ever, of his tactical acumen.
However, if a kid has an offer, but he hasn't visited and the coaches have no evidence his family is onboard with a decision to commit, I can totally see the coaches saying, «Hey, let's hold off until you visit the school with your family, because this is one of the most important decisions you'll ever make in your life and we want to make sure you and your family have all the information you need and all your questions answered before you make it.»
If you've ever squeezed a bath toy and noticed a stream of watery, black gunk come out of the little hole at the bottom, you've seen the evidence.
«The lack of any documents or testimony evidencing Ms. Bruno's duties on behalf of the [Foundation] coupled with the statements of the witnesses who all almost universally stated that they rarely ever saw Ms. Bruno at the office supports a determination that there is reasonable cause to believe that Ms. Bruno was afforded what amounted to a «no - show job.
In a desperate move for damage control after the contradictory evidence by the three witnesses, another banker, the fourth witness Mr. Bayo Dauda of GTB denied ever seeing any foreign account allegedly operated by Saraki.
But with our planet as their guide, astrobiologists are forced to acknowledge that oxygen may be the least likely thing they will ever see — genetic evidence suggests the complex oxygen - producing photosynthetic pathway pioneered by cyanobacteria is an extraordinary evolutionary innovation that only appeared once throughout the entire multi-billion-year history of Earth's biosphere.
What's more, scientists have been seeing evidence of seasonal weather — in the form of dark zones that may be lakes filling with methane rain — ever since Cassini arrived in 2004.
For more than you ever wanted to know about nuts and weight, see Nuts & Obesity: The Weight of Evidence.
Ice Age Floods National Geologic Trail — see evidence of the largest and most powerful floods that have ever occurred on Earth.
Stresa is a town and comune of about 5,000 residents on the shores of Lake Maggiore in the province of Verbano - Cusio - Ossola in the Piedmont region of Ice Age Floods National Geologic Trail — see evidence of the largest and most powerful floods that have ever occurred on Earth.
This is an unflinching look at the cruelty of life and nature, and those desperately looking for evidence of Haneke losing his cruel streak need look no further than what he's showing us with Trintignant and that damned pigeon to see that he's as dark as ever.
What is evidence of a fastidiously wrought out story is the fact that you can see each and every ripple, each action that the father takes that leads to an unforeseen consequence, and an ever - worsening situation that ultimately can be traced back to himself.
It's a mystery, you see — one that routinely mentions doors without ever really doing anything with that; one that returns repeatedly to clues just to pretend they mean something different this time; one that asks you to accept that a conscious human could find a box of evidence in her own art studio and not ask, «Hey, how did this get here?!»
Speaking at the CLOtC Annual Conference in November 2011, HMI Robin Hammerton said that the 2008 report into LOtC was the most compelling piece of evidence he has ever seen because in all cases the learning was improved and in all cases the young people benefited from the experience.
Not only is acceptance into university teacher education programs a highly competitive process, the autonomy, professional engagement of teachers is evidenced in their development of teaching materials, use of collaborative planning time, and the organization of professional spaces on school campuses (see Jen b.) Within this environment why would a teacher ever choose to take up the mantle of headmaster or school principal?
In the Indianapolis warehouse, far from both his office and the schools where the suspect tests were taken, he saw clear evidence of what has become the most widespread episode of cheating ever documented in U.S. public schools, one which has diminished one of the nation's few education success stories of the past decade.
Every good science «debate» have ever seen took an hour or so to mull over a tiny question, led immediately to a couple new testable hypotheses and experimental designs — each of which required a few months of independent bench work, though in some fields a week of computer time might be a more appropriate tool — and then ended up in a second, reconvened session in which evidence was presented and another aspect of the problem was discussed.
Prima facie evidence of bad faith if ever I've seen it.
My elemental objective is to show how extensive time exclusively devoted to seeing where the accusation came from and whether it has any evidence to back it up reveals a disturbing pattern: Inconsistent narratives that don't line up right; no hard evidence is ever presented proving such skeptics are in an orchestrated arrangement where they are paid industry money in exchange for fabricating false science assessments; and an overall set of talking points which is ultimately traceable to the clique of people surrounding Ross Gelbspan.
btw — are you ever going to get around to providing evidence and of those bad things we should expect to see?
But without a doubt the weirdest «evidence» he provides, and one of the most bizarre things I've ever seen in global warming discussions, is a link to this graph:
Fred: By all of the evidence I've ever seen, by his model Hansen represents that the temperature has a specific value.
See also: Laughing Gas Knocks Out CO2 — By Doug Hoffman — Oct. 30, 2009 — Excerpt: «In the face of ever mounting evidence that CO2 is incapable of causing the level of global devastation prophesied by climate change catastrophists a new villain is being sought.
The fact that the oceans — and not the land — were so warm last year should deeply worry us... There's evidence the Earth's oceans are undergoing never - before - seen change... When you couple 2014's record - setting oceans with our ever - increasing greenhouse gas emissions, it portends an ominous surge of heat globally — on both land and in the oceans — for years to come.
Anyone who's ever lived near a weather station close enough to see it on a regular basis probably has been providing anecdotal evidence of this for decades, but having an actual study to back it up has taken WAY too long.
The current California drought is bad because for the first time ever, scientists from many different fields see parallel lines of evidence for the influence of human - induced climate changes, including the fingerprints of higher temperatures and changes in the atmospheric circulation patterns.
As evidenced by the use of «bloody» in his response — the closest thing to public profanity I've ever seen from Mr. Cook — it was clear that he was quite angry.
Evidence from several countries does not support that, nor do I see convincing evidence that dry rock geothermal will ever be able to provide that quality ofEvidence from several countries does not support that, nor do I see convincing evidence that dry rock geothermal will ever be able to provide that quality ofevidence that dry rock geothermal will ever be able to provide that quality of supply.
Ask what actual evidence Gelbspan has ever offered proving the existence of any such «deception and disinformation» campaign, and you soon see how his core evidence is not what he says it is, and how his narratives about discovering it break down.
It's striking in this context to recall that, only 20 years ago, the phrase «Science Wars» was used in relation to generally leftish postmodernists in the humanities, who were seen as rejecting science and / or promoting pseudoscience (while some of this stuff was rather silly, there's no evidence that it ever did any actual harm to science).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z