Did
you ever see any evidence of a supernatural entity, or did mommy and daddy tell it to you as a kid, again and again, and you finally believed it?
Not exact matches
No amount
of scientific data or
evidence would
ever convince them that it wasn't God that put the tornado in their path... they just
see it as God challenging them.
@jujubee: Your right I can't honestly say that «god does not exist» is a fact; but, I can honestly say that «all
of the
evidence I have
ever seen indicates that god does not exist» and «I have
seen no
evidence that god exists»
No has
ever seen actual
evidence of your brain or your soul, so we should also conclude that you have no brain and you as a person don't exist.
Why is it — if we have all this power — we rarely, if
ever,
see any
evidence of it in our lives?
But sin in a believers life will also create seperation in their relationship with God, and we can
see evidence of this in human examples for anyone who has
ever been a parent.
So rather than engaging with the mountains
of evidence that I brought, because this situation was one
of the most well - documented cases
of institutional cover - up I have
ever seen,
ever, there was a complete refusal to engage with the
evidence.
Evidence of the fact that union differentiates is to be
seen all round us — in the bodies
of all higher forms
of life, in which the cells become almost infinitely complicated according to the variety
of tasks they have to perform; in animal associations, where the individual «polymerises» itself, one might say, according to the function it is called upon to fulfil; in human societies, where the growth
of specialization becomes
ever more intense; and in the field
of personal relationships, where friends and lovers can only discover all that is in their minds and hearts by communicating them to one another.
You don't need nor will you
ever see evidence for sure
of that, but I believe that if you religious nut jobs knew anything about gods natural laws you would instinctively know that.
I'm confused, what kind
of invisible
evidence have you
ever seen in a court?
It's because I
see ever more
evidence of the need for it.
Yes, this was
evidence that God also was upset about what this man named Jesus was teaching, and had
seen fit to make Him a public spectacle in the sight
of all so that nobody would
ever again seek to challenge the teachings
of the religious leaders or the traditions
of the Jewish people.
You have to find your own reason to believe because if you don't this Christian walk won't
ever ever make any sense to you.You say you care only for Christianity because «they impose their laws into secular law» but I think deep down you are lying to yourself.Islam has manifested itself into many many nations with their own law, I don't
see you
ever demand
evidence of Allah heck even what their religion states.You say you demand
evidence only when religions impose their laws into secular law but..
But when did majorities
ever intimidate Hartshorne, especially when he
saw evidence of genius on his side?
I guess I'll know it when I
see it, but as
of now, no one has
ever presented me with anything that I can consider as actual, factual
evidence that the God
of the bible is real.
If they
EVER were to be suspended, we would
see evidence of that suspension in at least a couple
of the billions
of experiments that have been conducted in the last 400 years
of formal science investigation.
«Usually after some great terrifying event» — that is some nice anecdotal
evidence of religion as a neurological disorder if I've
ever seen any.
and the limitations
of survey
evidence (
see Robert Wuthnow, «In Polls We Trust»), Zuckerman is correct that «these are the highest rates
of atheism / agnosticism
ever reported in an American survey.»
I will re-evaluate my opinion if I
ever see a piece
of evidence to say Wenger doesn't like spending rather than Silent Stan doesn't like spending.
What really galls me is that Wenger gets paid 8 million a year to manage a side and yet even the lowest paid bin man who is an arsenal fan can
see that OG and Theo are NOT nor will they
EVER be up to scratch un yet Wenger persisits against all the
evidence because he so desperately wants to prove the world wrong about either or both
of the afore mentioned.
I
see very little
evidence,
ever,
of his tactical acumen.
However, if a kid has an offer, but he hasn't visited and the coaches have no
evidence his family is onboard with a decision to commit, I can totally
see the coaches saying, «Hey, let's hold off until you visit the school with your family, because this is one
of the most important decisions you'll
ever make in your life and we want to make sure you and your family have all the information you need and all your questions answered before you make it.»
If you've
ever squeezed a bath toy and noticed a stream
of watery, black gunk come out
of the little hole at the bottom, you've
seen the
evidence.
«The lack
of any documents or testimony
evidencing Ms. Bruno's duties on behalf
of the [Foundation] coupled with the statements
of the witnesses who all almost universally stated that they rarely
ever saw Ms. Bruno at the office supports a determination that there is reasonable cause to believe that Ms. Bruno was afforded what amounted to a «no - show job.
In a desperate move for damage control after the contradictory
evidence by the three witnesses, another banker, the fourth witness Mr. Bayo Dauda
of GTB denied
ever seeing any foreign account allegedly operated by Saraki.
But with our planet as their guide, astrobiologists are forced to acknowledge that oxygen may be the least likely thing they will
ever see — genetic
evidence suggests the complex oxygen - producing photosynthetic pathway pioneered by cyanobacteria is an extraordinary evolutionary innovation that only appeared once throughout the entire multi-billion-year history
of Earth's biosphere.
What's more, scientists have been
seeing evidence of seasonal weather — in the form
of dark zones that may be lakes filling with methane rain —
ever since Cassini arrived in 2004.
For more than you
ever wanted to know about nuts and weight,
see Nuts & Obesity: The Weight
of Evidence.
Ice Age Floods National Geologic Trail —
see evidence of the largest and most powerful floods that have
ever occurred on Earth.
Stresa is a town and comune
of about 5,000 residents on the shores
of Lake Maggiore in the province
of Verbano - Cusio - Ossola in the Piedmont region
of Ice Age Floods National Geologic Trail —
see evidence of the largest and most powerful floods that have
ever occurred on Earth.
This is an unflinching look at the cruelty
of life and nature, and those desperately looking for
evidence of Haneke losing his cruel streak need look no further than what he's showing us with Trintignant and that damned pigeon to
see that he's as dark as
ever.
What is
evidence of a fastidiously wrought out story is the fact that you can
see each and every ripple, each action that the father takes that leads to an unforeseen consequence, and an
ever - worsening situation that ultimately can be traced back to himself.
It's a mystery, you
see — one that routinely mentions doors without
ever really doing anything with that; one that returns repeatedly to clues just to pretend they mean something different this time; one that asks you to accept that a conscious human could find a box
of evidence in her own art studio and not ask, «Hey, how did this get here?!»
Speaking at the CLOtC Annual Conference in November 2011, HMI Robin Hammerton said that the 2008 report into LOtC was the most compelling piece
of evidence he has
ever seen because in all cases the learning was improved and in all cases the young people benefited from the experience.
Not only is acceptance into university teacher education programs a highly competitive process, the autonomy, professional engagement
of teachers is
evidenced in their development
of teaching materials, use
of collaborative planning time, and the organization
of professional spaces on school campuses (
see Jen b.) Within this environment why would a teacher
ever choose to take up the mantle
of headmaster or school principal?
In the Indianapolis warehouse, far from both his office and the schools where the suspect tests were taken, he
saw clear
evidence of what has become the most widespread episode
of cheating
ever documented in U.S. public schools, one which has diminished one
of the nation's few education success stories
of the past decade.
Every good science «debate» have
ever seen took an hour or so to mull over a tiny question, led immediately to a couple new testable hypotheses and experimental designs — each
of which required a few months
of independent bench work, though in some fields a week
of computer time might be a more appropriate tool — and then ended up in a second, reconvened session in which
evidence was presented and another aspect
of the problem was discussed.
Prima facie
evidence of bad faith if
ever I've
seen it.
My elemental objective is to show how extensive time exclusively devoted to
seeing where the accusation came from and whether it has any
evidence to back it up reveals a disturbing pattern: Inconsistent narratives that don't line up right; no hard
evidence is
ever presented proving such skeptics are in an orchestrated arrangement where they are paid industry money in exchange for fabricating false science assessments; and an overall set
of talking points which is ultimately traceable to the clique
of people surrounding Ross Gelbspan.
btw — are you
ever going to get around to providing
evidence and
of those bad things we should expect to
see?
But without a doubt the weirdest «
evidence» he provides, and one
of the most bizarre things I've
ever seen in global warming discussions, is a link to this graph:
Fred: By all
of the
evidence I've
ever seen, by his model Hansen represents that the temperature has a specific value.
See also: Laughing Gas Knocks Out CO2 — By Doug Hoffman — Oct. 30, 2009 — Excerpt: «In the face
of ever mounting
evidence that CO2 is incapable
of causing the level
of global devastation prophesied by climate change catastrophists a new villain is being sought.
The fact that the oceans — and not the land — were so warm last year should deeply worry us... There's
evidence the Earth's oceans are undergoing never - before -
seen change... When you couple 2014's record - setting oceans with our
ever - increasing greenhouse gas emissions, it portends an ominous surge
of heat globally — on both land and in the oceans — for years to come.
Anyone who's
ever lived near a weather station close enough to
see it on a regular basis probably has been providing anecdotal
evidence of this for decades, but having an actual study to back it up has taken WAY too long.
The current California drought is bad because for the first time
ever, scientists from many different fields
see parallel lines
of evidence for the influence
of human - induced climate changes, including the fingerprints
of higher temperatures and changes in the atmospheric circulation patterns.
As
evidenced by the use
of «bloody» in his response — the closest thing to public profanity I've
ever seen from Mr. Cook — it was clear that he was quite angry.
Evidence from several countries does not support that, nor do I see convincing evidence that dry rock geothermal will ever be able to provide that quality of
Evidence from several countries does not support that, nor do I
see convincing
evidence that dry rock geothermal will ever be able to provide that quality of
evidence that dry rock geothermal will
ever be able to provide that quality
of supply.
Ask what actual
evidence Gelbspan has
ever offered proving the existence
of any such «deception and disinformation» campaign, and you soon
see how his core
evidence is not what he says it is, and how his narratives about discovering it break down.
It's striking in this context to recall that, only 20 years ago, the phrase «Science Wars» was used in relation to generally leftish postmodernists in the humanities, who were
seen as rejecting science and / or promoting pseudoscience (while some
of this stuff was rather silly, there's no
evidence that it
ever did any actual harm to science).