Sentences with phrase «ever seen in court»

He probably thinks of the best judge or magistrate he has ever seen in court, and does his best to emulate him in performing his own duties.»

«A very good advocate who has given one of the best performances I've ever seen in court.»

I'm confused, what kind of invisible evidence have you ever seen in a court?

Not exact matches

& # 9660 Big Oil has been seen as a corporate bad boy ever since the U.S. Supreme Court broke up John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil in 1911, but its reputation would hit a new low 99 years later.

Katz says that in the event Unblock Us was ever taken to court, it might be able to argue «fair dealing» as a defence on the grounds that it is providing content Canadians would otherwise not get to see and for which there is no justifiable reason.

Only gone for a few months, once back in the city, he saw that the Windsor Court was hiring, and that is where he has been ever since.

Garcia was emotional after the win, touched by the effort put forth by her teammates on the court, and by her father — a former standout Arena Football League quarterback — flying in from Las Vegas (where he coaches the AFL's Las Vegas Outlaws) to see her play her biggest game ever.

Harry meanwhile, having triumphantly routed the prosecution at his trial, inexplicably failing to substitute the struggling centre back William Gallas against Chelsea at Wembley seeing Spurs slip away in the concluding games of the season, architect of those superb displays against Milan in the European Cup, he remains as a supreme wheeler dealer, much though he hates the description, immensely wiser, shrewder and more worldly wise than he ever claimed to be in court, I feel he would always be happier at club level.

Arriving in court as a young boy, Jahan gradually finds himself in the inner - circle of the Sultan's premier architect, helping to build some of the most magnificent buildings ever seen.

LeBab is located in Kingly Court, moments from many bars if you do want to recreate the above, and provides the classiest take on kebabs I've ever seen.

Anders Behring Breivik — the man who confessed to killing 77 people last year in the worst mass murder Norway has ever seen — has been found to be legally sane by court - appointed psychiatrists, according to the Associated Press.

I often fail to understand slogans and metaphors relating to business; see http://www.slaw.ca/2016/01/12/a-mildly-embarrassed-philistine/), I must say that I don't recall ever personally or being party to trying to enforce rules in the High Court and exclusive primary sources deals.

Notwithstanding this point, the Court took into consideration the Province's submission ``... this is as good an opportunity as there is ever likely to be in the future for the Court to decide the question» (See para. 12) and concluded hearing and deciding the merits of this appeal would not risk the Court of Appeal straying into the legislative sphere.

And before his colorful turn of phrase in Windsor, Justice Scalia created an even more vivid mental picture with his dissent in a criminal case.14 Justice Scalia deplored what he saw as the court's ever - expanding definition of what constitutes «violent felonies» under the Armed Career Criminal Act, calling the statute vague and the majority's expansion of it a «tutti - frutti opinion.»

No child should ever have to suffer through the slings and arrows of a court battle — particularly one in which they see mom or dad displaying such insolent hostility toward one another, often pitting their children against the other spouse or forcing them to take sides.

Though I won't credit all my whining about the need for the Supreme Court to start addressing all the important issues left unresolved by Blakely and Booker (see, e.g., here and here), I will celebrate the big news coming from Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog that the Court today granted cert in «a significant sequel to its series of rulings on the roles of judges and juries in criminal sentencing» by accepting for review «the issue of whether a violation of the jury's role in sentencing can ever be excused as «harmless error.»»

Guberman notes that, according to Supreme Court insiders, Roberts» brief on behalf of the state of Alaska in Alaska v. EPA was the «best brief that the Justices had ever seen.»

The historic gap, which in the past has been canyon-esque as I'm fond of saying, this is where the courts developed the idea of fiduciary duty because as there were such dependence on the part of the client on the service provider because the client doesn't know and the client can't be expected to know whether or not they're being treated fairly or properly or what have you to getting good, you're getting good services, and I don't think that gap will ever close entirely but we are seeing the purchasers of legal services becoming more knowledgeable and more sophisticated, there is.

I've been in a lot of courtrooms, and I don't think I've ever even seen clear directions on whether and how someone should check in when they get to court.

While we see more legislation criminalising peaceful protest, repressive legislation for asylum seekers, and with Courts busier than ever before in family and care proceedings, more and more people will face these issues without legal representation.

The MP John Hemming was quoted as saying «I think this has a fair chance of being the worst case of human - rights abuse I've ever seen» and that he hoped this «would shock people out of their complacency about the corrupt practices in the family court».

With the blessing of two Palm Beach County circuit court judges, the guardian put Smith, who had suffered a traumatic brain injury, in a nursing home, got Martinez - Smith banned from ever seeing him again and annulled the couple's marriage.

As we will see in a future paper on the residential school court cases, the Canadian legal system must continue on this path of becoming ever - more civilized.

I'm not sure I've ever seen a Canadian court reverse - benchslap the Supreme Court in thiscourt reverse - benchslap the Supreme Court in thisCourt in this way.

It should not be surprising that we see some things differently, but as members of an institution described in the Constitution as «such inferior courts,» we are ever mindful that the Supreme Court has the last word.

«I also expect to see rising activity related to personal injury claims, as new rules coming into force will involve those cases being heard in a specialist court — which will see us working ever - closer with clients as they prepare to pursue or defend those actions.»

Despite expert testimony by a psychologist who asserted that the situation in question was the» worst case of PAS he had ever seen,» a Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that there was «limited research data» to support, as «a successful cure» for children suffering from PAS, the removal of such children from their mother's custody in affirming the trial court's refusal to transfer custody to the father (Weiderholt v. Fischer, 485 N.W. 2nd 442, 444, Court of Appeals held that there was «limited research data» to support, as «a successful cure» for children suffering from PAS, the removal of such children from their mother's custody in affirming the trial court's refusal to transfer custody to the father (Weiderholt v. Fischer, 485 N.W. 2nd 442, 444, court's refusal to transfer custody to the father (Weiderholt v. Fischer, 485 N.W. 2nd 442, 444, Wis..