Sentences with phrase «ever view of the science»

Hidden underground there has been a tremendous game of survival - of - the - fittest and we are fortunate to have the first - ever view of the science of that game.

Not exact matches

«44 This statement exhibits an mischaracterization of Bergson so extreme it defies words; if ever there was a more persistent opponent of Descartes» conception of natural science than Bergson, I do not know who it might be — with the possible exception of Bergson's process blood brothers — Peirce, Dewey, James, Whitehead and Hartshorne.45 In Lowe's defense it might be said that the eight or ten books that do the most to establish just how non-Cartesian, and indeed revolutionary Bergson's view of science was were all published after Understanding Whitehead.

The asinine views of hardened science does ever so slowly evolve their staunch minded theoretic culminations toward ever being enlightened by others perspectives found out to be plausible.

Of late this side of science has taken a backseat in the public mind to what I call the accumulation view of science — that it is a pile of facts way too big for us to ever hope to conqueOf late this side of science has taken a backseat in the public mind to what I call the accumulation view of science — that it is a pile of facts way too big for us to ever hope to conqueof science has taken a backseat in the public mind to what I call the accumulation view of science — that it is a pile of facts way too big for us to ever hope to conqueof science — that it is a pile of facts way too big for us to ever hope to conqueof facts way too big for us to ever hope to conquer.

Despite its housekeeping chores, such as the time - consuming business of pointing itself at new targets, called slewing, and repointing itself every 45 minutes or so when Earth and other bodies block the field of view, the Hubble manages to do science nearly 50 percent of the time - making it one of the most efficient telescopes ever to operate.

There are many arguments for and against such a funding model, and I've seen it from both sides: from the view of a small lab competing for ever - shrinking NIH funds, and as part of a major collaboration funded by «big science» awards.

«For 37 years, Voyager 1's last view of Saturn has been, for me, one of the most evocative images ever taken in the exploration of the solar system,» said Carolyn Porco, former Voyager imaging team member and Cassini's imaging team leader at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado.

If it ever represented the views of science fiction fans as a whole, those days are long gone.

That remains as good, and unresolved, a question as ever, and I hope those exploring it, whatever their values and world views, keep in mind Steve's dictum about separating science from preference and also his constant reminder that uncertainty is a form of information, not ignorance — and never an excuse for inaction.

For instance, US Senator James Imhofe of Kansas called climate change «the greatest hoax ever» (Johnson, 2011) To claim that climate change science is the greatest hoax ever is at minimum, if not a lie, reckless disregard for the truth given the number of prestigious scientific organizations that have publicly supported the consensus view, the undeniable science supporting the conclusion that if greenhouse gases increase in the atmosphere some warming should be expected, the clear link between rising greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere and increases in fossil fuel use around the world, as well undeniable increases in warming being that have been experienced at the global scale.

Some 3 - 4 years ago I started looking at the CET in more detail, ever since Tony and I have exchanged privately views and opinions, not to mention occasional Tony's kind and helpful advise, despite researching in the two totally different areas of the climate science.

In their September 19th press release concerning the affair, Friends of Science stated, «democracy is at stake as there are ever increasing calls to jail those who hold dissenting views on climate science.Science stated, «democracy is at stake as there are ever increasing calls to jail those who hold dissenting views on climate science.science.»

Climate science has to become sacrifice of the second type, in my view, minus both the glory and shame of looming catastrophe, if it is ever to get back on track.

My hypothesis is that you are scientifically illiterate, and not just that but smugly proud of your ignorance, that you will only ever quote papers that you think support your preconceived views, that you will generally wildly misunderstand and misinterpret those papers anyway, and that you have no capability of learning or understanding anything about the science of climate studies.