You could tell someone to believe in Jesus for
everlasting life without ever mentioning sin, spiritual death, a substitutionary atonement since these are just fluff or evidences yet they might be a stumbling block so if you just harp on eternal life isn't that neglecting the death and resurrection.
Not exact matches
Can't we be content know that we will
live our
lives and just die
without having to attach some
everlasting spiritual eternity to the whole experience?
Our knowledge of our determinism is
without struggle, because we know of no power that can set us free to be free indeed; our visions of possible
life amidst destruction are unaccompanied by visions of possible
life in the presence of glory and
everlasting joy.
Everlasting life is everlasting never ends but I can walk away from it without changing
Everlasting life is
everlasting never ends but I can walk away from it without changing
everlasting never ends but I can walk away from it
without changing its nature.
The first of the Thirty - Nine Articles is a comparatively simple assertion: «There is but one
living and true God,
everlasting,
without body, parts or passions; of infinite power, wisdom and goodness; the Maker and Preserver of all things both visible and invisible.
Eternity as a quality of
life is participation
without the right of duration, in the case of man, in the
life everlasting; 2.
What could be more dreary than
life everlasting without God?
The first is that eternity is a quality of
life; it is participation
without the right of duration, in the case of man, in the
life everlasting; the second is that
life is a continual stream of choices and consequences, of
living and dying, of repeated reincarnations in this world; and the third is that God reawakens us to
life after death in another realm beyond this earthly existence.
Apparently,
without a beneficial injection from the mythical fountain of youth or an
everlasting elixir, even franchises can't expect to outlast a reasonable
life expectancy.