Sentences with phrase «everyone agrees about»

McElhinney said it's a flawed argument by environmentalists that there's a consensus that everyone agrees about the causes and consequences of global warming.

Monday, October 10, 2011, 4 - 6 PM When it comes to Westwood Village there is one thing everyone agrees about: it has seen better days.

And if there is one thing everyone agrees about in drug policy it is that the MDA (and similar legislation in other countries) was not intended to create a huge criminal market; undermine international development and security; increase health harms including HIV / AIDS; promote stigma and discrimination; lead to deforestation and pollution, and undermine human rights all over the globe (see countthecosts.org for details).

Not exact matches

Love or hate the new president, there's one characteristic of Donald Trump that just about everyone can agree on — the guy likes to drive a hard bargain.

With the latter, you're prone to agree that «everyone is a certain kind of person and there is not much they can really change about that.»

But no matter which team you're cheering on in the Super Bowl, there is one thing about the most important night in football that everyone can agree on: the food.

And pretty much everyone agrees that celebrating to the things that are actually, currently good in your life is awesome for achievement and mental health (being kind to yourself about past failures also seems like a good idea).

If there's one thing everyone seems to agree on about Comcast's new wireless service, it's that the cable giant is playing it safe, and the four major carriers don't have much to worry about.

If there's one thing everyone can agree on about the Supreme Court, it's that the current term is a blockbuster.

Everyone raves about the software, and i agree — but concerned there are not more folks who are delighted and talking about their mgt service.

How about the government allows marriages for everyone and those marriages are performed always by JP's first and a church second and only when everyone agrees.

Perhaps a sermon should be regarded as great, not because everyone in the congregation agrees with the preacher, but because at the end of the service those present just can't wait to talk about it; to debate it together, because the text around which it was built has captured their imagination and curiosity.

Again, you may disagree with any of the premises, you may disagree that you are dumb, that you don't know what you are talking about, that God exists and loves everyone, and fine, even if the logic is perfect, the conclusion isn't valid for you, since you don't agree with the premises.

But just about everyone agrees: A 40 percent waste rate is unacceptable — and it's time to do something about it.

you know in this day of everybody saying what they think about everyone, it's wrong that rick was fired for saying what he thinks, i agree with him.

When just about everyone is a «Christian,» and all agree that they are living in a «Christian» culture, what is the meaning of Christianity?

It's good that people are at least talking about some sensitve topics, we live in critical times.2 Tim: 1 - 5 foretold this would be the case, but i am sure everyone would agree that there should be more love in the world.

I'm the kind of person who will make a scene at a restaurant, raving loudly about the to - die - for truffle sauce until everyone in the room has agreed to order the same meal for themselves.

But as soon as we take our methodical philosophizing too seriously and start demanding that everyone else agree with what we have figure out about God, well, that's when theology is not longer healthy, good, or enjoyable.

And yes, you're talking about a single event that happened thousands of years ago on a single day And I meant the later, when I ask question, they are generally honest questions, but back to the point, you agreed with me on every, because you assumed that at least part of the story was true, but who is the everyone you were referring to?

Just about everyone agrees that one reason religious belief and practice have flourished in the United States, in comparison with Western Europe, is that one state after another in the early republic ended the «establishment» of a preferred denomination and allowed all religious groups to....

It's just that it seems weak and ineffective, and likely to confuse people yet again, about what the Church wishes to do about what everyone agrees is the urgent need to help the family.

Whatever we perceive to be the truth about God, I think there is some things we all can agree on, believers and anyone who doesn't believe in the existence of God and that is that it is self evident that all are born equal and with dignity and it's best if everyone relate to each other as part of the human family.

I think that just about everyone would agree that these explanations fall short whenever we personally encounter the Problem of Evil in our lives and in the lives of our fellow human beings.

Still, not everyone agrees that a zygote or a fetus has a soul, and there is disagreement even among the most ardent pro-life supporters about the exact point at which an unborn child qualifies as a human being.

«There's no silencing of Sister Farley in the notification, there's no threat to her membership in her religious community; it's just about the book, which everyone agrees probably shouldn't be taught in Catholic seminaries, certainly shouldn't be taught in religious education classes for young persons.

Everyone was talking about it and I certainly didn't agree with all of it.

No - one is forcing contraceptives on you, if you don't agree... don't use them but don't expect everyone else to follow your lead - some people actually care about the world they reside in and know that we are responsible for keeping it together.

This whole thing is a joke when you realize that: not only is everyone unable to agree on what Jesus meant, but they are unable to agree on what they see about ANYTHING.

Not everyone with faith in God takes Eve as a physical being or even agrees if Moses was talking about the first Hebrew or Homo habilis.

Everyone can surely agree about that: and perhaps we should all focus on it a little more.

I assume, because I believe I have an understanding about the way the brain works, that everyone listening is going to integrate what they agree with and reject what they don't agree with.

There was one catch, though: Everyone had to agree about everything of consequence, which they almost always did.

Everyone usually toots the horn about this year being the best yet, I have to agree.

Although there are competing stories about the origin of this popular salad, everyone seems to agree the original recipe was created by an Italian - born Mexican named Caesar Cardini around 1924.

I had my doubts about this recipe since I had tried other mashed cauliflower recipes but I was truly blown away, they are fantastic and everyone who I have had try them agree, Thanks so much for this recipe

Stories differ about how their popularity spread, but everyone agrees that paletas originated in the small town of Tocumbo in the state of Michoacan.

And just about everyone in herbalism can agree: Consuming medicine in any form is just one part of the healing equation.

And I agree with you — got ta have a long title to let everyone know about all the great stuff in the recipes!

His critics may have a different story to tell about the drought of trophies but everyone will agree that Wenger had a positive influence at the club.

I don't know about everyone else but while I agree it is necessary for players like Walcott to leave, it is also sad to see someone that has grown up with the club leave.

Completely agree, it's almost pointless people posting topics as every one is turned into «get rid of Wenger» how about discussing the articles everyone.

@ 007 good point man but this is purely based on everyone's view on what factors they judge greatness in my perspective greatness is not only about winning I agree sir Alex was the most successful manager in the history of bpl but if u see the team he left behind then u will certainly doubt his legacy this is just opposite with arsene after giving us the hint that he might be leaving at the end of next season the other statement he makes is to leave a platform for incoming manager so that he can do well.This is the difference between him and arsene.

everyone an there mother would prefer vidal bro lol, i agree about carvalho he still looks very raw for such a vital position, but he has most of the tools, people on here are assuming he's a ready made dm — bit premature

I agree with that, though I think everyone will talk about it like it's an upset.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

this complaining about wenger gets nausiating, i know these type of fans will want the next manager out, then the next... everyone is a Klopp fan but no one want to mention his 16 th place in the relagation zone, our team is competitive, yr after yr, our wage structure, set by the board is lower than the oil rich rivals who can buy who ever they want, we do alot with less, and yet find a way, I do nt agree w every move of wenger, but i do nt want to support a classless dildo like jose either

Agreed, Walcott seems to be going backwards, the once, oh so promising young talent that had everyone raving about what he'll be like as a man, well that «man» has never arrived, he still looks like a boy and still has a boys physique, he shys away from tackles and his aerial ability is zero.

Everyone in the press seems to roundly agree that it wasn't correct within the rules of football, and the FA should ask more questions about whether Moss should still be on the pitch with his level of fitness and decision making, rather than Xhaka, so you would assume that it would be repealed.

I suppose that everyone is entitled to his own opinion, though, and one football pundit who is not usually known for saying anything good about the Gunners is the former Tottenham and Liverpool midfielder Jamie Redknapp, so I was pleasantly surprised to see that he does not agree with Hazard's assessment of our title credentials.