Everyone who works at the Legal Services Society contributes towards making sure
everyone has access to justice.
The impact on society when
everyone has access to justice will be nothing less than the fulfillment of the promise of our constitution and equality for all.
The purpose of contingency fee arrangement is to ensure that
everyone has access to justice.
This is an extremely important case in the ongoing struggle to ensure that
everyone has access to our justice system to resolve disputes such as who has custody of children after parents separate.
Not exact matches
Indeed, our research shows that up two thirds of them could disappear altogether, the corollary of which
would be a massive restriction of
access to justice for
everyone.»
Everyone, regardless of their immigration status or the status of their loved ones, should
have access to equal
justice under the law.»
And we won't
have to wring our hands about «
access to justice» anymore, which I'm sure will be a great relief
to everyone else who's tired of listening
to us talk about it.
Recent reports
have underscored that
access to justice is
everyone's problem yet the issue fails
to resonate with the public — they indicate low confidence and a sense of alienation.
That strikes straight
to the heart of the
access to justice conundrum:
everyone has lots of ideas about what the basic problems are and what could be done
to fix them, but there appears
to be more eagerness
to discuss the issue than
to deal with it.
You
'd think the principle that
access to legal information facilitates
access to justice would be supported by
everyone in the legal profession.
Jim Sandman, president of the Legal Services Corporation, which
has funded the New Mexico Triage System being built by Pro Bono Net and Neota Logic, and organized the Technology Summit,
to which one of us contributed and we wrote about in
Access to Justice —
Everyone, Anytime, Anywhere
A new website, The
Justice Index, provides a state - by - state scorecard of resources and initiatives designed
to ensure that
everyone has equal
access to the legal system.
By educating policymakers and the public about the importance of civil legal aid, the EJC works towards a vision of a Washington where
everyone has equal
access to justice regardless of how much money they make.
The oath's vagueness avoids licensees
having a duty
to provide
access to justice and legal services
to «anyone» or «
everyone» who seeks their service and may not be able
to afford such service.
For most law students and recent graduates this third thing
has fallen off the map at a time when
everyone from the Chief
Justices of the Supreme Court
to the Bar Associations, law schools and LSUC are talking about increasing
access to justice.
New opinion research shows that overwhelming majorities of voters believe it is important
to ensure that
everyone has access to the civil
justice system.
We believe that equal
access to justice for families and individuals who
have nowhere else
to turn is critical and that
everyone should
have access to the legal services and legal remedies — regardless of their ability
to pay.
While it seems
everyone is focused on efforts that will likely yield little
to no value for those who presently
have no
access to justice, the areas that are most effective in addressing
access are all but ignored,
to wit: pro bono and legal aid.
Virtually
everyone who
has looked at
access to justice on a macro level recognizes that a continuum of resources and assistance should be available
to people facing legal issues, starting with information and self - help resources on one end and full representation on the other, with varying levels of assistance in between.
By: Alice Woolley PDF Version:
Access to Justice in Criminal Law Case Commented On: R.
v Moodie, 2016 ONSC 3469 (CanLII) The Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees
everyone the right
to retain and instruct counsel on arrest or detention.
Overwhelming majorities of voters believe it is important
to «ensure that
everyone has access to the civil
justice system» and «strongly support a wide range of services
to enhance
access.»
This podcast checks all the boxes of authentic, engaging blogging — personality, opinion, humour, information — all on the latest developments in criminal law and
access to justice that
have (or should
have)
everyone talking.
Everyone should
have access to justice.
While the Court stopped short of conferring a freestanding constitutional right
to healthcare, it stated that s. 7 of the Charter (which provides that
everyone has the right
to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not
to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental
justice) confers a right
to equitable
access to medical services legally available in Ontario.
We believe that
everyone should
have access to justice.
Overwhelming majorities of voters believe it is important
to «ensure that
everyone has access to the civil
justice system» and «strongly support a...
This raises a question about whether
everyone in BC
has equal
access to the
justice system.
«All the people in the
justice system
have a voice,» she says, noting it's important
to ensure
everyone participates in coming up with solutions
to the
access to justice issue.