Sentences with phrase «everyone in the legal profession»

I find it a bit hypocritical that some of the bloggers want to lump us legal marketers all together, while at the same time, apparently think that everyone in the legal profession is above reproach.

You'd think the principle that access to legal information facilitates access to justice would be supported by everyone in the legal profession.

Baroness Scotland says: «This is a strategy for everyone in the legal profession.

People often believe that everyone in the legal profession uses sophisticated and elaborate language at all times.

«Our goal is to empower everyone in the legal profession by granting courtroom opportunities to the next generation of lawyers,» said Vidal, a former electrical engineer and leading patent litigator.

Not everyone in the legal profession approves of the direction we have taken.

But not everyone in the legal profession can run well.

This has to be a collective effort — everyone in the legal profession and its associated institutions has to play a part.

Not exact matches

The legal profession here and there began to resemble the Ik tribesmen, neither hunting nor farming, but preying on everyone in sight, including one another.

However, the main criteria was to incorporate artificial intelligence in the products and demonstrate the benefits of the product towards the legal profession in the future in terms of speed, efficiency, and increased access to justice for everyone.

«As a result of the legal profession pricing itself out of the market, there is a discussion triggered by the obvious crisis of millions of people forced to go to court in a system that assumes that everyone has a lawyer, without one.

Pelletier says the barreau is taking this information, along with many of the lessons it learned about promoting women in the legal profession, to try to put out the message that those same changes should apply to everyone.

Generally lauded by judges and leaders of the profession, the long - term systemic value of pro bono legal service is a matter of limited but uneasy debate in the community of reformers, progressives and do - gooders dedicated to the concept of equal access to justice for everyone.

That's why Let's Talk Day on Jan. 27 is as important to the legal profession as it is to everyone in our society.

Introducing herself in a post yesterday, she said that one of her primary objectives «will be to make Evolve the Law the go - to source for lawyers, legal technologists, law schools, and everyone who is invested in the future of the profession.»

NEIL STERNTHAL: Obviously we're in a period of tremendous transformation in the legal profession where everyone is being asked to do more with less.

This is why I'm thrilled to take on this new challenge as Director of Special Projects at Above the Law, where one of my primary objectives will be to make Evolve the Law the go - to source for lawyers, legal technologists, law schools, and everyone who is invested in the future of the profession.

If unbundled services was a more common occurrence in the legal profession, you better believe everyone would want to be able to charge $ 200 for something that cost them $ 10 to generate.

Pretty well everyone agreed that the legal profession was in for a pretty major shake up in any event simply from the impact of technological change, let alone regulatory requirements (and Brexit).

Virtually everyone in law school and the legal profession today has talent: some combination of raw intelligence, analytical and logical adeptness, and / or communication ability.

Virtually everyone who's in or preparing to enter the legal profession has speed.

Embracing the constitutional imperative to realise the freedom and equality of everyone and accepting that our inequitable past has produced the economic and skills distortions overwhelmingly favouring white male practitioners to the prejudice of black and female practitioners in the legal profession, and now committing to correct that history;

Accepting, in particular, that, generally speaking, the transformation initiatives to empower black and women practitioners have been met with some reluctance and resistance on the part of some of members of the legal profession and industry broadly; and acknowledging that black and women practitioners have not been treated in line with the foundational constitutional values of equality; the right to equal access; the right for everyone to choose and practice their profession freely, and

Virtually everyone uses verbal fillers, though the frequency can vary greatly from person to person.18 A study of one language database showed that speakers produced between 1.2 and 88.5 uhs and ums for every thousand words, with a median filler rate of 17.3 per thousand words.19 Other databases show anywhere from three to twenty uhs and ums for every thousand words, placing uh and um thirty - first in a ranking of most commonly used utterances, just ahead of or and just after not.20 A British study showed that, contrary to popular expectations, the use of verbal fillers does not indicate a lack of education or manners; instead, the use of uh and um increases with education and socioeconomic status, a finding with particular implications for the legal profession.21 Older people use more uhs and ums than younger people, and, curiously, men consistently use verbal fillers more often than women — a finding that has been replicated across several studies.22 Women, for their part, appear to use a higher ratio of ums to uhs than their male counterparts.23

All the different players in the legal industry may not always agree, but the dialogues that are happening now are rich and need to continue, to help everyone understand how we can build on the best values of the profession and innovate our services to meet the demands of justice consumers today.

Not everyone is convinced that A.I. robots such as this will necessarily disrupt the legal profession in a profound way.