And understand that people rely on them,» May will say, insisting that «
everyone in this party cares deeply about our public services» with many relying on them.
Not exact matches
Ahead of the general election Macmillan will be calling on all three
parties to commit to: • deliver cancer outcomes that match the best
in Europe • ensure all cancer patients are treated with the highest levels of dignity and respect and that staff are supported to do this • ensure
everyone at the end of life is given free social
care to support them to spend their final weeks and days
in the place of their choosing.
James Lloyd, an expert
in long - term
care funding at the Social Market Foundation thinktank, said creating a fair and properly funded system would need the political
parties to agree and for
everyone, both young and old, to contribute financially.
Studies show that a single payer system that covers
everyone would lower overall health
care costs by $ 45 billion
in the first year alone,» said Gloria Mattera, state
party co-chair and a board member of the NYC Physicians for a National Health Program.
I actually feel rather embarrassed around this flick: I feel like I'm at a
party, and
in the corner is a normally inoffensive but not particularly interesting girl, who has applied red eyeshadow with green mascara, and come
in nothing but fishnets and a T - shirt
in an attempt to get some attention, but
everyone's still ignoring her except me, and now she's coming over to talk to me because she's just so desperate... I want to say to her, «Gee whiz, Joey, even with that colossal wardrobe blunder, still no - one
cares!
Even if
everyone in your
party is completely healthy, without adequate travel medical coverage, you could be paying serious money for medical
care if someone gets sick or injured on the trip.
So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment
in a court case needs to fully inform the
parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and
everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking
care of and spending time with children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third
party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent
caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person
in fact an «expert»
in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.
Hmmm... sounds like President Barak Obama's 2009 Affordable Health
Care Act plan rollout when he / the Democratic
Party, Senate leaders, Hillary Clinton et al said that
everyone would find out about all of the plan's details «after» the bill was passed
in the Senate and became law.