Just as
everyone values their points and miles differently, decide how much you value your time and sanity.
Not exact matches
«
Everyone has tried to play the
value game at one
point or another,» Passikoff explained to Mashable.
With an invitation for
everyone to walk through the build - your - own pizza, calzone or salad process, the quality and personalization is unmatched with a
value - based price
point that keeps guests coming back time and time again.
Pick 54 — TE Dallas Goedert (South Dakota State)-- huge run on defense right before the pick, was best available Pick 78 — LB Malik Jefferson (Texas)-- last LB we took out of Texas turned out well for us (bye DJ), probably more of an OLB for us Pick 86 — DL Dashawn Hand (Alabama)-- getting him here is good
value for splash plays, needs more consistency but worth the risk Pick 124 — DL B.J. Hill (North Carolina State)-- #more meat for the trenches Pick 199 — Edge Dorance Armstrong JR (Kansas)-- at this
point in the draft he's well worth the risk for the upside Pick 211 — DL Lowell Lotulelei (Utah)-- #more meat for the trenches Pick 233 — OL Bradley Bozeman (Alabama)-- another C / G option for our line with experience on a good line / team, also see #meat / trenches Pick 243 — LB Skai Moore (South Carolina)-- here's the WILB
everyone wants way down in the 7th round
We don't believe
everyone deserves a trophy, but we have seen the problems associated with a ranking system, and have urged schools to consider other ways to honor their top students — ways that rely less on a grade
point average and that are more similar to the MVP status on a sports team - where multiple skills and traits are
valued.
Remember, the whole
point of co-sleeping is that
everyone gets good quality sleep in an environment that works with your family's beliefs and
values.
If we permit students to self - segregate on the basis of education philosophy — to attend schools where
everyone else shares their
values — won't we deprive students of exposure to differing
points of view?
However, as I like to
point out to
everyone who is looking for an affordable car to drive, the allure of new - car smell can easily be superseded by the dependability, reliability,
value, and size supplied by a larger compact that is used but not abused.
To present a critique article,
everyone needs to understand the
value of logical thinking because to prove your
points on critique article, you need to think logically.
My only
point is that in such a widely held stock, the premise of undervalued is a bit stretched, as
everyone has an opinion and thus, the market has
valued the business quite fairly.
Since no one actually the true
value of a certain stock and
everyone has all available information, there is an equal chance that stocks are under or overvalued at any
point in time.
Everyone else says their card earns miles, but in reality Fixed
Value cards earn proprietary
points which are worth around 1 cent per
point.
At some
point, almost
everyone realizes the
value of long - term relationships and most even eventually find comfort in daily routine.
But even if you
value points as worth less you still are looking at a pretty incredible return in non-obscure categories that I think
everyone can spend money in.
Unfortunately if it was always easy
everyone would do it and we couldn't get the great
value we do from
points.
I
value Club Carlson Gold
points at around 0.4 cents each so, straight away, I'm not likely to be tempted by this sale... but not
everyone may feel the same way.
So, I have spent several hours with a patient Chase Private Client banker calling
everyone we possibly could inside Chase to find out what
value Chase plans to assign at year end for the 50,000 Ultimate Rewards
points.
Southwest RR
points are not as fixed
value as
everyone makes them out to be.
Everyone gets a different
value out of their redemptions, and people argue all the time about whether they're getting the full
value of the face
value of a ticket or hotel room from the miles or
points they redeem for it.
We feel we have enough
value for a $ 15 game but wanted to sell it at the lower price
point for
everyone.
The first clearly and effectively traces the rise of curators as bestowers of
value in the artworld (and elegantly glosses struggles for the control of
value — between critics, dealers, artists and curators — along the way), up to the
point at which curating's deskilling and populism means that
everyone can do it and inherently contradicts the discipline's quest to professionalise itself via academic courses and qualifications.
I do think there's a lot of
value in having a designated person who does the consultations but right now we're at a
point where
everyone is really doing them which is great for me as the owner to step back but we'll have to test that and see what happens.
To
everyone's
point the math (cash flow and / or appreciation) is dependent on a pretty fair
value for the property.