everything described of her breed are true..
Not exact matches
Brad Stone
describes an early version
of Amazon's flywheel in The
Everything Store (one
of my best books
of 2013):
These days people use the word «awesome» to
describe everything from a new episode
of their favorite show to a tasty hot dog.
Lawson
describes Nichols as «the Zelig
of conspiracy theories» — a mystery man rumoured to be involved in
everything from the Iran - Contra scandal to the CIA's MK - Ultra mind control experiments to the JFK assassination.
Nixon's White House was notoriously paranoid — one man once
described it to me as a «pirate ship,» with knives out against one another and a general position
of distrust
of everyone and
everything outside
of it.
The best way I can
describe the people we want is like this: There are some people who throw great dinner parties because they really want to take care
of their guests, and there are other people who are lousy at it because
everything is a chore,
everything is a problem.
And why are companies allowed to use it to
describe everything from boxes
of Cookie Crisp cereal to bottles
of raspberry iced tea?
There's nothing to
describe the sense
of doom as you stare down the barrel
of a Category 5 storm knowing you should be tying
everything down, boarding
everything up and driving far away.
I'm not sure, but I think Mike Larson,
of Weiss Research, coined «
everything bubble» to
describe what's been going on since late 2012.
Brad Felger, founder and CEO
of Airstrike Bird Control, has had a self -
described love for
everything with feathers, scales or tails since he was 12 years old.
------ No, the Bible
describes God's act
of creation as forming
everything in its mature state.
You want to imagine scientists have some kinda «theory
of everything», but science is a process that involves more questions, some
of which are never answered, than it does «
describe everything».
It would be possible to
describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you
described a Beethoven symphony as a variation
of wave pressure.
Like Einstein said: «It would be possible to
describe everything scientifically, but it would make no sense; it would be without meaning, as if you
described a Beethoven symphony as a variation
of wave pressure.»
Acts
describes how «no one said that any
of the things which he possessed was his own, but they had
everything in common.»
Lol, that
describes how about 99 %
of people following
everything.
They spent most
of Monday doing their darndest to make
everything worse, from defending manhandling a customer («We followed the right procedures») to blaming the passenger himself (claiming he was «disruptive») to coining a laughably bad neologism to
describe their treatment
of him («re-accommodated»).
Calvin Pater, one
of Williams's students,
described his mentor's work in this way: «Only Williams would decide to specialize in
everything; thus clasping to his breast both and and, with either and or together — a state
of affairs that would have scandalized a Kierkegaard.»
Nevertheless, many contemporary critics (including Jewett) insist that
everything in the letter must be directed by Paul to the historical circumstances
of his first readers:
everything in chapters 1 - 13 should be understood in terms
of the community differences
described briefly in chapter 14: the strong are contemptuous
of the weak because
of their observance
of dietary and Sabbath rules, while the weak are judgmental
of the strong for their failure to observe the same.
The warm, Christian smiles were set aside at that point, and the time - delayed effect
of our own indoctrination came into play: We dropped the guise
of warm, friendly God - the - Son and reverted back to God - the - Father who looks at the entire world as
described in Psalm 50:10 and says, «
Everything I see is MINE.»
The Talmud quotes a rabbi: «The end purpose
of everything our Mishna has
described is the life
of the world to come.»
Instead, Dark advocates «keeping
everything talkaboutable» — a phrase I love, and a phrase I hope
describes the nature
of our conversations on this blog.
The divine principle that constantly seeks creative transformation in
everything may be
described as God's Logos — the divine, creative Word that expresses the very life
of God.
For this book, I am using the phrase to
describe our sense
of self at a time when you feel like
everything that you once knew «for sure» is being figured out all over again.
One who beleives this way could view God, using another way
of describing it, as a grandparent who spoils his grandchildren rotten, minimizing the child's responibility, not properly diciplining them, or not diciplining them at all, and giving the child
everything he asks for and thinks
of.
Luther likened Christ to the «star and kernel»
of Scripture,
describing him as «the center part
of the circle» about which
everything else revolves.
This same attitude is
described by Paul to the Church
of Rome
of the function
of the Scriptures: «For
everything that was written in the past was written to teach us, so that through endurance taught in the Scriptures and the encouragement they provide we might have hope.»
In the second section, the document drew attention to the confusion that existed in the use
of the word, «ecumenical», and insisted that this word, which comes from the Greek word for the whole earth, was previously used to
describe everything that related to the whole task
of the whole church to bring the Gospel to the whole world.
Everything he has
described goes back to the christian version
of god.
After the first Planc Second
of The Bang,
everything can be
described and explained by math, physics, checmistry, etc..
The desire for a theory
of everything is understandable and a natural outgrowth
of the human consciousness, cognition and value that Nagel
describes; but so is humility.
The final clue in this epic journey is the word Tolkien invented to
describe what he saw as a good quality in a fairy - story — and that word was eucatastrophe, this being the notion that there is a «sudden joyous «turn»» in the story, where
everything is going well, «giving a fleeting glimpse
of Joy», whilst not denying the «existence
of dyscatastrophe —
of sorrow and failure».
If the job
of an artist is indeed to look at the world and
describe what they see,
Everything Now is Win Butler's overly ambitious all night term paper, an attempt to mix social commentary with disco, the state
of American culture with a club beat.
They do not know that at this very moment scientific thinkers have abandoned that older mechanical picture
of nature and have come to see, even to insist, that science does not exhaustively
describe the whole range
of experience nor
everything in the world
of nature.
Scientists do not have clear, provable theories to
describe the evolution
of all species in existence, and
everything about the earth (if you think I'm wrong on this point, you either live in a box or you're delusional), but we do not throw out evolutionary theory merely because it is incomplete.
The word would be used to
describe everything from a personal note (written and passed to another), a receipt
of an item purchased, a person's will after death etc..
We are victims and practitioners
of the modern mind - set that relies on what Italian philosopher Gianni Vattinio
describes as «the reduction
of everything to exchange - value» (The End
of Modernity).
On the other hand I hold that the technical expression so many philosophers have used as though it were self - explanatory and unambiguous — «the absolute» — is viciously ambiguous and that the more nearly self - explanatory term «independent» is safer, provided one makes explicit what the entity so
described is independent
of, whether
everything else or only some other things, and according to what principle the distinctions are made.
Similarly, there is also a constant dynamic towards unifcation,
describing the material universe by single rather than disparate laws, such as the quest to link general relativity / gravitation with quantum mechanics in a «Theory
of Everything».
That's a religious concept used to
describe how YHWH supposedly «popped»
everything into existence, out
of nothing, not even thin air.
But we'd do well to define what «cult» actually means, both inside the Christian church - i.e., Christians use the term largely to differentiate other religions which deviate from orthodox, historical and Biblical Christianity - and outside, where it's thrown around to
describe everything from followers
of Kevin Smith films to any organization that's secretive and raises boat loads
of money.
However, against Calvin, Reinders questions whether the very idea
of God's justice is undermined if
everything that happens, including evil and suffering, is
described as part
of God's direct plan.
Everything I'm about to
describe goes for all types
of beans, by the way, I just happen to be using black beans because they're my favorite.
Mangiamele says Bennigan's required a total overhaul
of its entire operations, so he started by performing what he
described as a full «360 - degree analysis»
of everything that had to do with the brand about a year ago.
It's not hard to
describe the spirit
of Aloha; put simply its kindness to
everything and everyone and it is wonderfully infectious.
Arsene then
described his feeling during the four minutes
of added time, when we threw
everything except the kitchen sink at the Foxes.
As for defensive backs, what I saw towards the end
of last season was often the opposite
of how you
described the Seattle cover - 3 strategy, which in your words «tries to convert
everything to man coverage based on the level and type
of route being run rather than just simply alignment».
Orta has been
described as «the main problem» and the «scapegoat» and that's a classic example
of what Leeds United fans see,
everything very differently.
In recent years the italian fans have witnessed
everything: players going on strike, allegations surrounding corruption, champions stripped
of a title then relegated and a national team that can only be
described as spectacularly inconsistent.
A recent article in The Players» Tribune shows us that even famous NBA players can be affected by anxiety and panic attacks; Kevin Love perfectly
describes what it was like the first time he had one (during a game in November): «It's hard to
describe, but
everything was spinning, like my brain was trying to climb out
of my head.