Not exact matches
Second,
out of everything discussed in this post, I also believe that the correct taxation
of forks is the murkiest and most «up for
debate» area.
I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were
debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come
out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why
everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string
of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.
Everyone covered this story at the end
of May, and the
debate raged on into June, until it came
out that perhaps not
everything was quite what it seemed.
I'm not really taking sides here, but pointing
out that for the underlying support
of the «don't worry» argumentation here to be effective, IMHO, the premise must be that the previous 5 extinctions were caused by sentient beings that knew and
debated the consequences
of their actions, thus
everything turned
out OK»cause there's still sentient beings around to choose their fate.
He actually believes
everything that comes
out of his mouth such as; I invented the internet., Love Story is about Tepper and I., I flew with FEMA to view the fires in Texas (per 2000
debate).