Sentences with phrase «everything was on point»

They made sure everything was on point for me.

everything is on point.

Be sure to measure your progress and make sure everything is on point with a Ketone Meter that will monitor ketosis.

Everything is on point here.

«You're making sure everything is on point from every angle,» says Jacobs on the styling process.

From your hair to your wedges, everything is on point.

The first one should be very easy to follow in the UK I think the 20s are when we spend 10 or so years working out what suits us best so that by the time we turn 30 everything is on point... at least I hope that's the case!

Not exact matches

I've been working on this already (ie everything I've done to this point makes me ready to win here — doesn't mean industry expertise but means some combination of skills and assessment of why you'll succeed)

At the moment, everything in a car from a design point of view is based on a 100 - year - old package — engine in the front, and a driver holding a steering wheel behind.

You don't want to be too hard on the employee to the point where they feel discouraged — but you also don't want to sugarcoat everything.

If this is your company and you're caught in the middle of a minefield, your best option (short of quitting) for conflict management is to rise above it: Point out the specific behavior in question, don't personalize the issue (be objective), communicate assertively and state the facts, and document everything that goes on.

It could be that the company is a one - man show that has reached the point where one person can't do everything on their own.

«I can't say too much about the new products and the things we are developing, but from a pure technology point of view, everything that we've done on vehicles translates directly into trucks,» he said at the time.

As well, there's sales materials, cabinetry, displays, ventilation, vaults, point - of - sale devices, security systems and everything else it takes to comply with regulations on medical marijuana dispensaries or recreational use shops.

At this point, Senator Ted Cruz entered the fray and responded to Hamill on Twitter, saying, «Luke, I know Hollywood can be confusing, but it was Vader who supported govt power over everything said & done on the Internet.

The key point is this — everything that investors can expect to obtain from selling stocks 7 years from now is already on the table today.

In a world where we're bombarded daily — even hourly — by data points on everything from stock prices and market cap to...

While the anonymously maintained blog tends to be on the hyperbolic side, many articles point out real concerns with everything from economies laden with debt to high - frequency trading dynamics.

They can also inform your content, messaging points, and value proposition, so you can ensure that everything on your website, in emails, and on social media is in alignment with exactly what your target market is looking for.

Everything is pointing up and investors are willing to make riskier bets on fast - growing companies.

I would be delighted to follow up my appearance on Midpoint: Question Everything with Ed Berliner, in which Ed and I discussed the economic issues around immigration policy, with a few points and references.

He says that based on the economic data, the fed has set up some parameters for itself and from a data dependent point of view, they have everything they need, but James believes that what will hold back the feds will be market instability.

«It's been kind of annoying having to deal with that and everything else that's been going on but at this point, you know, we're changing the world.

For the last few weeks, Daily Getaways has been offering discounts on everything from hotel points to vacation packages to car rental points.

Everything from the weight, balance, grip, length, aggressiveness and craftsmanship are on point.

Even if the government ran a balanced budget or a budget surplus, the Fed would still be able to inflate the money supply (therefore, Mr. Hussman, with whom we agree on nearly everything else in his highly readable weekly comments, is in error on this particular point).

This points out that everything that you explained as being only aplicable to god, which is an explanation given because no other explanation is seen, saying this is amazing so god did it, is nowhere near close to looking at these phenomena, observing and collecting the data on it and saying this is our best understanding of it to date.

«I have read some good commentary on Ecclesiastes and the author points out that this is Solomon trying everything under the sun, minus God.

On this account, everything was somehow fine until Paul VI refused to bend with the times — at which point all hell broke loose.

Second, We don't know if there was nothing before the big bang, we just know that right before the singularity the universe expanded astonishingly quickly and the laws of the universe and everything was born from that point on.

Where the critical point in his earlier theology of grace is God's crucifying contradiction of sinful human nature, here the point on which everything hinges is the authority of Christ the Savior, exercised concretely in the sacramental signs of the Church.

Maggie, distraught over all that she's lost, asks Dunn to end her life, and everything that happens from that point on — from the festering ulcers on her body, to her attempted suicide — is intended to justify Dunn's decision to help her.

I will not enter that debate here, except to say that the reflections on memory that dominate Book X have everything to do with the story that Augustine has been telling to that point.

«When a single person breaks the rules of the game,» Havel writes, «thus exposing it as a game, everything suddenly appears in another light and the whole crust seems then to be made of a tissue on the point of tearing and disintegrating uncontrollably.»

My father also taught me, even when I was a child, that Bruce R. McConkie, who wrote some unflattering stuff about non-whites in «Mormon Doctrine,» stood in Conference after the 1978 announcement and said he had obviously been wrong on those points, and he retracted everything not in keeping with the Brethren's announcement.

That's one of the things I was pointing out to someone who read a book on necromancy (long island medium) and was totally sold on everything the author wrote and was now at «peace» from reading about the endless cycles of death — i.e. soul coming back as such... dying then coming back again as another.

Accordingly, in the surest current way of getting on the track of Jesus» preaching, it is elevated to a methodological presupposition that everything which points toward the post-Easter kerygma can not be considered for Jesus» preaching.

It's not been too great for me and some of the other members of the movement... It's been kind of annoying having to deal with that and everything else that's been going on but at this point, you know, we're changing the world.

Your being ridiculous for assuming my math is wrong when it is actually correct... In order for things to be correct like life itself the numbers have to be exact on point off and everything crumbles.

don't think so... anyway I was trying to make a point... just because you decide to rely on science doesn't mean you know everything... just because I choose to rely on God..

Stanley went on to repeatedly say that he believes «the Bible is without error in everything it affirms» and that he «believe [s] what the Bible says is true, is true,» and pointed to the work that his father, Dr. Charles Stanley, to preserve the belief in the infallibility of the Bible among modern Christians.

that there is no afterlife, that there is no point on having faith at all, that everything exist by no apparent reason.

If God is not sovereign, in other words if you are not dependent on Him for everything and if faith, through which people are saved comes from themselves, what is the point then of praying to Him?

ElmerGantry — the only points you make that are accurate are 3 and 4, you might want to do a little research on everything else, sorry but no one not even Mormons believe your points.

Even though mountains should not exist at this point (because mountains only come about via deadly tectonic plate shifts and everything was very good on day seven), the flood waters covered the highest mountains.

And they got upset and were trying to figure things out and finally became so frustrated that the Law was so hard to follow and God kept sending them into captivity and there was so much death and eventually the prophets started prophesying about a day that would come where the hearts of the fathers would return to their children and a sacrifice that would be the final sacrifice so that they could all stop killing so many animals (which God also admitted He never wanted in the first place because that was not the point), and also that God would eventually wipe out the old system and write his law on their hearts and minds so that they could finally follow him without making so many mistakes and messing up everything.

Here is the point: such an argument against utilitarianism stakes everything on a pre-philosophical intuition about the heinousness of murder.

Lanzetta points out that this crisis has made Traditio appear in opposition to «progressivism» whereas of course everything in the Church is Traditio, literally «handed on», all the way back to Christ himself.

This restatement was intended to shed light on his new point while also showing how the new doctrine would in turn enlighten everything that preceded it.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!